[untitled]
1 comments
The article misses the point on the findings and the proceedings themselves. It's practically impossible for "Israel" to comply with the provisional measures without cessation of all hostilities, and the plausibility of there being a genocide (to be clear, it absolutely is one, just getting a legal verdict on that is a laborious process) means that foreign states are less able to prop up the Jewish supremacist regime materially and politically. That judges from predominantly western nations voted so comprehensively against the atrocities being committed and the public statements made by the politicians should make the Zionist regime a bit more circumspect about it's behaviour, however their arrogance will probably prevent that outcome. Their days are numbered though, thankfully.