Maybe people read it as an endorsement rather than an observation. No biggy, just Internet points. Though you have apparently rescued me from -2 to +5 so thank you.
I've always instructed Claude to check the policies first, frankly I'm surprised it's not smart enough to do that already. Would be easy to add to a system prompt. But usually it doesn't matter because many projects have no policies, or maybe they exist but only in hidden forum posts issues or something.
I'd love if they would include speed (though I know there are difficulties involved). At this point the quality of Opus 4.8 is no longer my limiting factor, it's the speed, so a faster model would be great.
This isn't a problem which needs to be solved perfectly, at least in this context. If some electronic music creators (using 2015 level technology) get reduced play and some fully AI music gets through the filters it's really fine.
Current models are smart enough for me and don't present an existence risk. Good time to show down. Maybe make the models faster and cheaper while preserving performance.
> Uses a lot of acronyms without even saying what they stand for let alone an explanation
> Article entirely unhelpful
Many such cases