HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

GaveDrohl

no profile record

comments

GaveDrohl
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Fair enough, but who won't testify in the future out of fear of being murdered?

It still served a purpose of true.
GaveDrohl
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Most crypto currencies don't and probably never will. But those such as Bitcoin that are the most decentralized and censorship resistant are crucial to those living under authoritarian regimes and whose currencies are going through significant debasement. The mad rush to make a quick buck and the propaganda from those in power have distorted the original intent behind crypto.

Also, corporations such as Nvidia that depends on the good will of the government are motivated to fall in line with the government's stance, which is negative given the threat it poses to the power and control they maintain having USD as the world reserve currency.
GaveDrohl
·4 tahun yang lalu·discuss
If it went to zero, it would only because a better crypto supplanted it. Crypto is here to stay. Hopefully not just as CBDCs.
GaveDrohl
·4 tahun yang lalu·discuss
You want to fire up a Mastodon server because I presume you're concerned with the loss of free speech on that platform? Do you think it was free prior to Elon's acquisition? Or are you only concerned about one particular type of speech when it comes to free speech?
GaveDrohl
·4 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Cool, now do Twitter.
GaveDrohl
·4 tahun yang lalu·discuss
S&P & Moody's would not lie!/s
GaveDrohl
·4 tahun yang lalu·discuss
If you're claiming that no politicians have made this their agenda, then I guess the planet is in trouble!
GaveDrohl
·4 tahun yang lalu·discuss
This guy lost me after listing his biases. If your approach or the technology requires you to work at that low of a level, then we're doing something wrong. We should be abstracting complexity away, not depending on being knowledgeable of the inner working of things, like browser specific tricks (unless necessary).
GaveDrohl
·4 tahun yang lalu·discuss
The solution is simple. The platforms should take full advantage of the protections granted by Section 230, while designing the platform to support pluggable 3rd party moderation. You don't want to see Nazi posts, or have them reply to your tweets? Opt for a moderator that provides that. Third party moderators could even supplement content, particularly those that go viral, with fact checking or contrary views as chosen by the user.

Will people still opt for no or biased moderation and be susceptible to fake news? Certainly, but with some tweaking, proper incentives, and quality trusted moderation, it would be enough to improve discourse and fact finding compared to what we have now, which is one dominating group controlling what we think and see.
GaveDrohl
·4 tahun yang lalu·discuss
How much did everyone using Firefox pay for the privilege of using their browser? It's ironic to me that there is so much anger over a communist China ad, while at the same time they want to benefit from the hard work of others for free. TANSTAAFL people.