OR we could demand they get expensive irrelevant degrees and be geniuses at coding by the time they graduate with no relevant skills! Hey, in fact, let’s just do that instead. :)
“Pagan” as a word is used to mean “non-Christian”, which in modern times, doesn’t really carry any weight in terms of what you’re saying about their practices. Christians are more than happy to insist they have some sort of religion that is “more advanced” while simultaneously being /historically recorded/ as having acted violent, cruel, callous, and superstitious to anything outside of what their parents and community told them was “religion”, and this only carries over to the printing press being used as the means by which to disseminate their poison. Your ideas of religion are backward and given to you by the sellers of poison for the soul.
Do homicides increase? Or merely gun-based homicides become more prevalent?
I think that gun dealers likely open their doors when people are more likely to want to make a purchase. The supply and demand curve isn’t that demand for guns supplies murder, but rather the population having a larger predisposition to violence during certain times leads to these correlated data points, WITHOUT causation. That is of course, very boring and nuanced and not likely to be interesting enough for grant money or as a political wedge.
“People in bad circumstances act poorly” is not really that intellectually stimulating, to wit.
“Incels” are not radicalized and mostly do not exist. If you want to stop seeing boogeymen everywhere, stop inventing them. Show me an incel! I demand to see one, both male and female!
No one can do this, and because no one can, the idea itself is bunk. This idea is not worth engaging with intellectually as it’s merely just meant to serve as a means to fabricate a boogeyman to crank out articles against.
Your search engine is missing every possible beer that I would want to see on a craft beer search. No Abita? Nothing from anywhere in the East coast? No rare beers or Sours?
Why is it seemingly always a stylistic choice to make the information more obfuscatory than it needs to be? Why does this article name drop “Data Access Object” as some sort of esoteric secret when it’s a literal defined thing. Why write an article that requires foreknowledge or a search engine to understand? Or is this about Microsoft’s data objects? Or what? Lol.