HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

Lomlioto

81 karmajoined 3 hari yang lalu

comments

Lomlioto
·23 jam yang lalu·discuss
I don't downvote.

And i brought an argument. You said it makes space-x very valuable and i explain that the amount of payload we even send up is very limited which contracditcs 'very valuable'.

I then explain further what Elon Musks plan is to sell us his trillion dollar company or how you frame it 'very valuable' and explain why it doesn't work
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
This is great right? Lets pollute our sky for 8 Billion people that tyjen can send a whatsapp message to people while sailing.

Awesome!
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
Starlink has 10 MILLION customers. Thats just nothing.

All the investment in Fiber and mobile towers are long lasting investments.

Starlink NEEDS v3 to scale because they already have scaling issues. They need Starship, which doesn't work yet, to work to even send v3 up there.

And while Spacex has some first mover advantage, other companies start doing the same which will eat their margins. Makes it even more complicated to run all of it.

They have to do 300k orbit correction already last year, kessler syndrom can happen which will block access to space for all of us.

We don't even know yet how dangerous the poisoning of our atmosphere will be.
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
Its very easy to dig.

You still need a powerline to your house, sewer and water.

There are plenty of fibers and dark fibers on power pools.

Starlink doesn't 'just' pollute the night sky for EVERY SINGLE HUMAN (8 Billion people) it can also poisen our atmosphere when they re-enter and burn up.
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
While i would love to have 1 gb, 50mbit is not bad and every normal person i know of, wouldn't call it bad at all or see it as an issue.

So not a problem
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
No its not.

The payload we send to space is very limited and the 300% increase in the few last years was ONLY starlink itself.

Thats the issue Musk has to sell it to the investors and his idea is datacenter payload.

Just that he would need to send 300 Starships up there to even install a smallish datacenter like his own colossus 1.

Starship is not done yet, we have not seen it fly up there and return for 300 times at all.
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
A Starlink antennna would create a lot of reflection in anything metal like a barrel or bathtub (why would you even have a bathtub on the roof?).

Finding it would be very easy as these houses are not huge houses, enter the house, snip the cables.

Besides that, its all hypotetical. Just because in some random shitty neigherhood this issue exists, doesn't mean anything anyway.
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
Yeah but it doesn't become a Trillion dollar business if they don't solve the Starlink Satelite v3 issue.

They need Starship to be able to send v3 up, without v3 it doesn't scale well enough.

Starship still hasn't proven it can actually bring up the relevant payload high enough and they need it to be reusable otherwise costs will increase.

And they already exist and only have 10 Million customers. They need to get countries on their side like India but these countries are not stupid. Elon Musk showed them very clearly what he can do like his statements he did when Ukraine war started.
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
We already have Starlink. Starlink only has 10 Million customers.

Starlink increased prices just a fwe weeks ago.

So whats stoping the future starlink explosion?
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
No they sell a story to investors.

Right now we do not even have the antenna technology in current high end smartphones for 'easy to use, normal speed' mobile to satelite communication.

And funny enough, the more local mobile phones you would have, which want to send data to a satelite, the harder the problem gets due to interference.

With 5g we do already a lot of beam forming etc. Try beamforming into 500km space with uncoordinated random amount of mobile devices with very very little sending power and one satelite 'beamforming' its a few hundred square miles.
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
It will take years if not more to be technical capable to have modems so good that they can communicate with a starlink satelite in any reasonable 'day to day' way.

And Starlink already increased prices again.

And without Sparship and prooving that they actually can reuse it, they can't hold the price point.

Starlink satelites do not scale very well. They need v3 and even with v3 this doesn't scale efficently.
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
Starlink only has 10 Million customers, too expensive for most countries already.

Starlink brought internet to a lot of people who had it before already but made it easier for them.

Its still quite a interesting technology, given, but for the fact that he destroys potentially our atmosphere, has control over war critical tech, can do survailance and wants to send out A Lot MORE into our space, its a net negative for at least 7-8 BILLION people while 10 Millionen people benefit from it.

And they even increased the price just a few weeks back...
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
Hope for what?

For less starving people? For less child abuse? For less climate change?

I look up at the night sky and i want to see stars and the endlessness of the universe and don't want to be reminded that Elon Musk will poisen our atmosphere.
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
And for what?

For a planet which gets warmer and warmer.

When did you became that compliant?
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
Buddy our anceostors were able to see the night sky.

I don't need a space station with space tourism only the richest can afford and will be still very dangerous to see the stars right now.

What you will see is how Starlink satelites will poisen our atmosphere at re-entry.
Lomlioto
·kemarin·discuss
What happened to you that you became that dismissive?

Was it not a big issue for you that aeroplanes were flying overhead?

Whos responsibility was it that you were living were you lived?

I guess there is a small difference between being able to choose or parents have choosen for you vs. everyone on the whole planet needs to endure it.
Lomlioto
·kemarin dulu·discuss
I don't get manipulated or becoming weak just because I have empathy.

And the way Elon Musk acts, its very well in his line to be just a massive dick about everything.

of course you have to grow as a human being to have empathy and still not act on it, but it gives you a different mental model.

I don't see a homeless person as garbage, i see a homeless person as a human being who struggles and i accept that i can't help everyone.
Lomlioto
·kemarin dulu·discuss
There were plenty of YT Videos of Military analysis and News Paper articles about why USA suddenly attacked Iran.

Adelson Family as donor to Trump and Bibi.

Other donors might have motivated him too: Bernard Marcus and Paul Singer

I can't collect though a list of sources to read through for my statements. But i don't think my view is very controversal at all.
Lomlioto
·kemarin dulu·discuss
Not sure were you even get this 'indication' (from your nose?)

But i'm happily argueing things out with arguments and points I make. So
Lomlioto
·kemarin dulu·discuss
What has some unpopular leader to do with Elon Musk? Nothing. Why do you do whataboutism?

Elon Musks fault or offend is trying to influence my countries democracy. That from the richest US American Immmigrant from South Afrika.

I find this quite dangerous and something to fight against.

And just because you don't care about this at all, you wouldn't try to remind people what a Elon Musk is and you don't care about his influence and how he gets his money.

I do.