To let the model know when to call them, you send a list of it to the model as part of the context. Each MCP contains a description and sometimes each tool contains a description.
Look online for Kx systems history of IP enforcement and legal threats. They are well known in the quant community for essentially being the Disney of time series databases. Nice tech yes, but the people behind it hold values that are typically diametrically opposite of hacker ethos. Good riddance.
A shit ton of beam forming and phased arrays. Why do you think all of a sudden there's a bunch of "WiFi Radar Imaging" projects popping up on HN? It's not just because of advances in ML. Boost the output power by a few more magnitudes and you can probably ship them to Ukraine.
> Claude Fable 5 represents a partial step back in alignment relative to Claude Opus 4.8. We saw a return of power-seeking and deceptive negotiation tactics that Opus 4.8 had largely shed. In one instance, Fable 5 planned to convert a competitor into a dependent wholesale customer to dictate its pricing
I think OP needs to take a class at one of the better MBA schools. He's looking at things through rose tinted lenses. Why do you think people hire McKinsey consultants? It's certainly not because they are aligned correctly.
My favorite feature from Claude code is the "auto" mode to dynamically approve permission queries that are reasonably safe. Unfortunately the standard pi sandbox extension doesn't support it. Pi should really build permissions into the agent leve.
I wonder if it supports Private Relay. Private Relay is great for getting around scraping blocks because they explicitly whitelist apple private Relay ips.
> the Chinese one won’t reply to subpoenas so thats a value add tbh
That's not something that's definite. They are not quite like the Russians. A lot of the governments in Asia are overly pragmatic and will happily strong arm their companies to throw users under the bus for the sake of a trade deal. There's a reason why Snowden ran to the Russians and not China.
Also, if they have any subsidiaries in the US, they may not have a choice in the matter.
> What ruins this for C is the existence of pointers. Stacks aren't freely relocatable since pointers into the stack could exist. Other languages don't have this problem
They were limited by the tech of the time too. A modern clean sheet redesign of a 747/A380 class airplane would look very different given modern composites and improvements in engine bypass and compression ratio.
At some point, you will get diminishing returns no? I don't think compute is the bottleneck right now for mechanical engineering if you don't count AI.