Surprisingly confused. Some kernel of truth in here.
It's not really free speech that's at issue here is it?
It's discourse populated by other human beings, or the "right" to be clearly heard. That's already contested, without AI. No transparent attribution.
lmao, if you read the book, you'll see that this is not in fact the case. The Chinese treatment of the British envoys in fact caused public sentiment in Great Britain to turn against China, because the public had such high hopes for the mission in building friendship.
If supposedly what you say is true, then the Imperial court chose the worst possible way to go about it. China's mistake was it's pride.
HAHAHA! We'll see how long this lasts. Looks like Facebook is at least temporarily responding to the Senate hearing. You all should have seen this coming a mile away. I'm sure they'll try to weasel their way around it or somehow still milk users for their data.
I got: Nothing