Wouldn't it be possible to write some kind of local proxy server with MITM for HTTPS that modifies scripts and supplies the missing functionality for ublock origin?
There is not much need for a company like the one selling adblock plus to springer etc. I don't see any court going after ublock origin and there is no reason that ublock origin would be threatened by this in any way. However, the actions from google with manifest v3 are a real threat, as well as any obligation to use real name accounts to access services like newspapers or youtube.
If you right click a link and open in new window (or middle click), the frameset was gone and only the piece in the frame was visible. Also you could not bookmark anything. I remember doing a frameset per content frame url automatically and also redirecting to that frameset from inside the page via javascript if the content frame's url was directly opened.
How does this work? Do they demand you to use Azure for your servers so they get a discount? Or do you have to create instances of your product in e.g. VMs that are put in their Azure account? Did you have to completeley leave every last bit of gcp behind? How is this checked by MS?
Related: If you send an e-mail to "Some Name with something interesting" <[email protected]> and company.org runs Microsoft Exchange and [email protected] is in Active Directory, then Exchange will erase "Some Name with something interesting" <[email protected]> and replace it with a pointer to Active Directory and you will never see "Some Name with something interesting".
Like the opposite effect as discussed here. o365 is probably doing the same
While security software and antivirus deserve all the injection blocking they may get, we must also consider how to bypass these mechanism when it's about reenabling adblocking by injecting DLLs in the browser for request blocking etc.
Windows also contains 3 drivers loaded during boot, all starting with wd*, especially wdboot.sys. If they are loaded, some paths to defender and registry keys are blocked. I always remove them from the custom ISO I use to install windows using dism.exe.
You can also reboot into safe mode and rename them. After that, chipping away at defender using takeownership etc. works.
If you just rename the folders, those drivers are probably still active
Does anybody know more about the "Substrate App Platform group"?
As far as I understood it, actually Microsoft Exchange and ESENT powers a lot of Office 365, e.g. the compliance tools, the search and e.g. teams chats. Next to it is another pillar: Sharepoint, which is also exposed as OneDrive and is based on SQL server.