HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

atilaneves

no profile record

comments

atilaneves
·5 bulan yang lalu·discuss
> You don't need Emacs

Yes, I do.
atilaneves
·5 bulan yang lalu·discuss
> and lose access to most things

What "most things" are these?
atilaneves
·5 bulan yang lalu·discuss
No, you can just write D. It'll have the same performance as C, if you write C-like code. It might have better performance than C if you use templates (just like in C++).
atilaneves
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Yes, that's my point. I'm replying to claims that "if it compiles it probably works". My limited experience with both is "nah".
atilaneves
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Because it is also possible to write tests that don't adequately capture real-life requirements.

It was an MQTT server, and the tests basically went "if we have these subscriptions, then...", but no subscriptions ever got actually stored by the server.
atilaneves
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Every language with a GC drastically reduces the chance of memory errors.
atilaneves
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I hear this about both Haskell and Rust, and yet, when I tried both in the former I wrote a useless program because I didn't handle state (and yet passed all tests!) while in the latter I immediately wrote a deadlock.

So...yeah.
atilaneves
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I made the same comment last week upon learning of a redis clone entirely vibe coded in IIRC ~70k lines of Rust. Why Rust? Why does a computer need a memory safe language?