HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

awanderingmind

no profile record

Submissions

The Prevention of Literature (George Orwell, 1946)

orwellfoundation.com
2 points·by awanderingmind·3 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

In Praise of Idleness (1932)

harpers.org
152 points·by awanderingmind·10 bulan yang lalu·14 comments

comments

awanderingmind
·6 bulan yang lalu·discuss
My personal site where I post essays about various things - generated using hakyll: https://www.awanderingmind.blog/
awanderingmind
·6 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I found the writing, and the descriptions of the types of trisectors, strangely poignant. Most of us do not attempt to trisect an angle with straightedge and compass; but surely many of us have other irrational obsessions with which we waste our time (I have certainly been guilty of this). I hope people can find time to look up from their interactions with social media and LLMs for enough healthy introspection to avoid these traps.
awanderingmind
·9 bulan yang lalu·discuss
This is a strange analogy. The policy saves people money on their power bill. The backyward furnaces are considered a disaster because, among other things, they produced low quality steel, and diverted labour from agriculture and other things, none of which is the case here - people pay for solar panels and install them once, and then achieve savings.
awanderingmind
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
There is a lot of focus in the comments on the authors' credentials and, apparently, their writing style. It is a pity, because I think their discussion of scaling is interesting, even if comparing LLMs to grid-based differential equation solvers might be unconventional (I haven't convinced myself whether the analogy is entirely apt/valid yet, but it could conceivably be).
awanderingmind
·12 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Cool study. I really want to believe the results, but the effect on life extension is so large (see figure 2B) that I find it hard to. Maybe there was some uncontrolled confounding factor? It is noted in the 'Methods' section that 'Researchers were not blinded to group allocation [...]', which is unfortunate.