HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

bowsamic

2,497 karmajoined 4 tahun yang lalu
I am rate limited, so I may not reply.

Submissions

Pornhub to stop new UK users accessing site from next week

theguardian.com
8 points·by bowsamic·5 bulan yang lalu·1 comments

comments

bowsamic
·23 jam yang lalu·discuss
I don’t need to give reasons for my son to follow my orders
bowsamic
·kemarin·discuss
Why would I tell my son not to drink beer? He can do so as soon as it’s relatively safe to
bowsamic
·19 hari yang lalu·discuss
[flagged]
bowsamic
·23 hari yang lalu·discuss
Significantly worse than the Deutschland ticket
bowsamic
·23 hari yang lalu·discuss
Same on macOS. Could be that we are missing some native compilation option though
bowsamic
·26 hari yang lalu·discuss
ePub compatibility issues are one of the worst parts of having a Kobo reader. I genuinely miss my Kindle and its simple but reliable MOBI format. At least there everything worked
bowsamic
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
No, I don’t want to name and shame. It was a few years ago
bowsamic
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Inkscape is the only software that I see people get so defensive about when criticised. I even had the lead dev appear in my mentions and try and start fighting me on twitter when I complained on my own timeline about the performance on macOS. Weird culture
bowsamic
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Solipsism is wrong.
bowsamic
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
This is why I don’t use this site. Low IQ discussions and insults from morons
bowsamic
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
You don’t need any observations at all to build up a complete knowledge of the entire universe. Hegel showed this
bowsamic
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
It can resolve them though
bowsamic
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
> Nobody can ever know an ultimate why, for obvious and well established philosophical reasons

Yes we can, you are just presupposing that philosophy is ultimately ineffective. For example Hegel gave a presuppositionless development of all metaphysics among other things. It’s not some kind of philosophical consensus that ultimate justification is impossible
bowsamic
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I’m just curious if you are so dependent on LLMs that the idea of not using them at all seems extreme to you
bowsamic
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
> But I wonder does this mean no AI was used at all? Even for say, code review?

Would that be surprising to you?
bowsamic
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Any logic with LEM
bowsamic
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
This makes it good for formal maths, but bad for philosophy, since it means it can’t encode the speculative movement
bowsamic
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
For me the widespread fear over this is evidence that it’s different from syntax highlighting and stuff
bowsamic
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
> Just because you use AI doesn't mean your brain grows a black hole from which information can never return.

How do you know this? I’m not taking that risk
bowsamic
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Small stdlib, “implement it yourself” philosophy to even things like classes, diverging language versions and fragmentation (a lot of people don’t like any of the post 5.1 changes), bad tooling and editor support, dynamic duck typed language with no type hints