bronxpockfabz

2 bulan yang laludiscuss

While I do agree with an overall sentiment, you can't seriously think this is a viable solution for most developers, surely.

bronxpockfabz

2 bulan yang laludiscuss

> Crypto is also on the verge of the next wave of adoption

Since roughly 2018 I reckon, at least.

bronxpockfabz

2 bulan yang laludiscuss

We might as well future proof this by writing specs in YAML-ified Ruby, this way it's more flexible, I've been told it's best practice!

bronxpockfabz

3 bulan yang laludiscuss

> An entire website encoded in a URL

It is very much not, open the network tab on any of the examples, behold.

bronxpockfabz

3 bulan yang laludiscuss

Sure, but what's the point then? Seems like .html with extra steps, not to mention that the URL itself won't work.

Now for online, the data is in the URL already, publicly available (unless shared privately), and the "loader" is still served from the server, so you have to trust the server not to exfiltrate the data.

bronxpockfabz

3 bulan yang laludiscuss

> hosted nowhere

> present everywhere

> Still here when the internet isn't

I'm afraid the OP may not have full understanding of how internet works. This is either some kind of a post irony, or some vibe code fever dream.

Either way, I'm deeply confused.

comments