HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

chrislusf

no profile record

comments

chrislusf
·27 hari yang lalu·discuss
I work on SeaweedFS. Let me know if see any bugs or just create a github issue.
chrislusf
·bulan lalu·discuss
If less components is desired, use SeaweedFS, which supports S3 table buckets and Iceberg catalog and maintenance. Basically storing Iceberg tables data and metadata.
chrislusf
·5 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I work on SeaweedFS.

Just download the single binary, for most platforms, and run "weed mini -dir=your_data_directory", with all the configuration optimized.
chrislusf
·5 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I work on SeaweedFS.

I am trying to support AWS S3 APIs as complete as possible.

Recently added support for Table Bucket, besides myriads of details, such as policies, STS, IAM, OIDC, WORM, lock and versioning, governance, etc.
chrislusf
·5 bulan yang lalu·discuss
(I work on SeaweedFS.)

Haha, you used Claude to find the Clause code.

I used Claude to generate a lot of admin UI pages, saved a lot of time. The core storage engine part I dare not using AI, same as you.
chrislusf
·5 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I work on SeaweedFS since 2011, and full time since 2025.

SeaweedFS was started as a learning project and evolves along the way, getting ideas from papers for Facebook Haystack, Google Colossus, Facebook Tectonics. With its distributed append-only storage, it naturally fits object store. Sorry to see MinIO went away. SeaweedFS learned a lot from it. Some S3 interface code was copied from MinIO when it was still Apache 2.0 License. AWS S3 APIs are fairly complicated. I am trying to replicate as much as possible.

Some recent developments:

* Run "weed mini -dir=xxx", it will just work. Nothing else to setup.

* Added Table Bucket and Iceberg Catalog.

* Added admin UI
chrislusf
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I work on SeaweedFS. It is not backed by any greedy VC. So no urgency to make a large profit from the open source community.
chrislusf
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
It is in the parent comment.
chrislusf
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Not correct. The files are chunked into smaller pieces and spread to all volume servers.
chrislusf
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Disclaim: I work on SeaweedFS.

Why skipping SeaweedFS? It rank #1 on all benchmarks, and has a lot of features.
chrislusf
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I work on SeaweedFS. So very biased. :)

Just run "weed sever -s3 -dir=..." to have an object store.
chrislusf
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I work on SeaweedFS. It has support for these if conditions, and a lot more.
chrislusf
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Thank! There is an admin UI already. AI coding makes this fairly easy.
chrislusf
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
This is Chris and I am the creator of SeaweedFS. I am starting to work full time on SeaweedFS now. Just create issues on SeaweedFS if any.

Recently SeaweedFS is moving fast and added a lot more features, such as: * Server Side Encryption: SSE-S3, SSE-KMS, SSE-C * Object Versioning * Object Lock & Retention * IAM integration * a lot of integration tests

Also, SeaweedFS performance is the best in almost all categories in a user's test https://www.repoflow.io/blog/benchmarking-self-hosted-s3-com... And after that, there is a recent architectural change that increases performance even more, with write latency reduced by 30%.
chrislusf
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
> I really don't understand why you aren't eager to explain the differences and what problems are being solved.

Sorry, everybody has different background of knowledge. Hard to understand where the question comes from. I think https://www.usenix.org/system/files/fast21-pan.pdf may be helpful here.
chrislusf
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
> Why does a user need that? Filesystems already break up files into blocks / sectors. Why wouldn't a user just deal with files and let the filesystem handle it?

A blob has its own storage, which can be replicated to other hosts in case current host is not available. It can scale up independently of the file metadata.
chrislusf
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
The blob storage is what SeaweedFS built on. All blob access has O(1) network and disk operation.

Files and S3 are higher layers above the blob storage. They require metadata to manage to the blobs, and other metadata for directories, S3 access, etc.

These metadata usually sit together with the disks containing the files. But in highly scalable systems, the metadata has dedicated stores, e.g., Google's Colossus, Facebook's Techtonics, etc. SeaweedFS file system layer is built as a web application of managing the metadata of blobs.

Actually SeaweedFS file system implementation is just one way to manage the metadata. There are other possible variations, depending on requirements.

There are a couple of slides on the SeaweedFS github README page. You may get more details there.
chrislusf
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
A large file can be chunked into blobs.
chrislusf
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Sorry it was not so clear. Previously fallocate just allocate disk space for a local server. Now SeaweeedFS can allocate a blob on a remote storage.
chrislusf
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
> How is that not mmap?

The allocated storage is append only. For updates, just allocate another blob. The deleted blobs would be garbage collected later. So it is not really mmap.

> Also what is the difference between a file, an object, a blob, a filesystem and an object store?

The answer would be too long to fit here. Maybe chatgpt can help. :)

> Is all this just files indexed with sql?

Sort of yes.