BMus in Piano Performance, Midwestern State University
MS in Computer Science, Midwestern State University
PhD in Computer Science, University of Notre Dame
My YouTube channel where I post videos about CS:
https://www.youtube.com/user/coreyp1
The playlist where I create a programming language from scratch (watch video #100 to get an overview of the project):
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZqirAnnqaCZ8lT8w7p2PUB7tqrId7d89
My blog that I haven't updaded in forever:
https://cscrunch.com
What do you mean by my "existing account"? I didn't have an instagram account before today.
But, as a general rule, I keep all of my accounts separate. There's too many horror stories of a person getting locked out of one account, and then they can't do anything else.
Separate accounts are the only safe option.
I think my takeaway on this is just that Instagram isn't worth the hassle. I did lose the write-ups that I did for my pictures, though (which is why my upload pace was so slow).
I wouldn't know. I only know what it's like to (1) set up an account of any type, which usually requires quite a bit of initial activity, followed later by (2) decreased ongoing maintenance.
But, whatever. They set up an automated system that weeded out a human while letting bots run rampant.
Maybe we need a page about "falsehoods programmers believe about human behavior", but they wouldn't read it. :/
Well, I guess I'm forever lost as a user, since I'm banned for doing the very thing that they encourage... sharing my original content.
I disagree, though, that it's spam behavior. It's "well, it's time to set up my account" behavior.
I mean, it's not like they could provide for a human to review after they asked for me to take a selfie. A selfie that shows the same person as the one that has used the facebook account with the same email address and face for over a decade... No, that's definitely asking too much. Or perhaps informing the user of concerning behavior, because all that they did was point to "community standards", which said nothing about what I was doing.
Apologies... my snark is not directed at you. It's just the exasperation towards a system that makes actual human participation impossible, while assuring that bots are the only ones who can get something done and yet stay under the radar.
Yes, that sounds like something that a harness would do internally, but not expose. My own project will do something similar for spinning off worker agents. You could expose it, however, by (1) a custom MCP server that assembles and provides the result directly into the context, or (2) see if you can wrangle the skill feature of an existing harness.
The newer models are nice, but the harness is the secret sauce that can make or break the experience. I wish we had better open tools for using/modifying these types of things.
In our company, Claude keeps trying to run terraform commands (another team member's experience). Thankfully, it's in a locked-down environment, but it still keeps trying, even if you tell it not to.
In development, it will sometimes do all sorts of wild and convoluted things because the conversation has been compressed and it suddenly can't remember the structure of the project or other critical instructions.
AI should never have access to a production environment. Ever. Thankfully, we enforce that.
With 128 GB strix halo, you can't do as big of a model as you would think. You can do larger than having a single graphics card, of course, but that 128 gigs cannot all be dedicated to the model. Remember, the context alone is usually larger than the model itself. I got an EVO X2, and I don't regret it, but by my current calculations, it will take 8 years to recoup the cost, as opposed to just using equivalent, paid commercial options.
They meant that this is a technique that relies on a person's vision, which means that the blind, by definition, are being excluded. They weren't being hostile toward the blind, they were pointing out that the project itself is hostile towards the blind.
There are so many variables here. My question is how much do you have to invest into getting it done right?
Local has come a long way, but it is still limited and slow. And while there are some people who have done stuff like this, the field is so new that you're probably going to get someone that doesn't have direct experience with everything. In other words, they're going to get stuff wrong. You will have to rebuild some part of it. You might not purchase the right hardware. Can you live with this?
In all fairness, though, if you have someone who has experience in evaluating new systems and using them to build something, then you can still be in good shape. I mentioned this, simply because it's a skill that is not as common as we would like in this world. Just look for someone with a track record of delivering functional software using new technologies.
My personal bias is that I love to keep as much local as possible, but I also realize that I bought a $3,000 machine that so far has saved me $5 in tokens from an external API. As I see it, the only real reasons to have local AI at the moment is privacy, but that does fit your use case.
As for a turnkey solution, they have their benefits, but their moat is significantly smaller now than it used to be. Quite frankly, you can vibe code the majority of TurnKey solutions in a weekend. Well, at least the parts that you need.
Sorry to not give more specific answers, but a lot of your questions may depend on whichever developer you decide to use. There's not necessarily a wrong answer in many cases, there are multiple paths to achieve what you are trying to do. If I were you, I would focus on long-term maintainability and security of your system. For example, you can have the best thing in the world, but if you can't pass a SOC2 (or, even worse, your developer has never heard of something like that) then you are going to be in a lot of pain.
These are available to read completely free online, but I do plan to purchase the physical books some day.
[edit] I realize that I should probably give more context to my answer. The books on the site are basically interviews with the authors of the software and they discuss what choices they made as well as the advantages/tradeoffs of this approach. In other words, the direct answer to your question is to learn by reading what other people have written about their own successes and glean from that.
[edit 2] Your favorite LLM could also provide a list of books that are similar in spirit, but there's just something about the series that I linked to that I like.
This resonates with me, but what helped was to come to a realization.
I love coding. I love low level coding. But I haven't written any code in the last 6 months, roughly.
But I don't feel empty or dissatisfied at all. My realization for myself is that I love solving problems and designing elegant solutions. Using AI, I still have to do that. I still have to make choices about how I want specified modules to interoperate. I know the big picture, and can catch when the AI is taking a shortcut.
I realized that it is all still low level design in my eyes. And I enjoy doing it, whether with my own hands, or with AI.
The amazing thing with AI, though, is that it has allowed me to explore so many things much quicker than I could before. It's still my design, my ideas, and even my poor choices that I have to deal with, but it reduces the boiler plate, so to speak.
That, and it has allowed me to explore more than I ever dreamed that I would be able experience.
Nice. I have a friend who is a young accountant. I have tried to get him to consider AI, but he claims that they tried it and it's not that good. I've tried to get him to understand that AI has improved dramatically in the last few months, not to mention the last few years (their point of reference, I believe).
I'm in the same boat. I have 2 old servers that I let get "too" old, and now I'm afraid to touch them to update them. However, with some of the shenanigans that the Linux distributions are pulling around age verification/attestation, I'm considering bailing on them entirely.
Note, I did try Artix, but when it broke last week after a restart (in which evidently something had gone wrong with an earlier kernel update), and I had to pull out a rescue ISO, I decided I didn't want to mess with that. I switched that machine to Devuan, but the jury is still out for me. I don't have any major complaints, but I'm still in the burn-in phase. :) I'm running Arch on a laptop, but they have been a bit hostile in the community with censorship, so I'm just waiting for a free weekend to blast it and put something else on. I don't want political drama in my software.
This all comes at an interesting time, though. This is the first time that I purchased a new laptop and didn't even let it boot into Windows, but instantly installed Linux. And everything "just worked". And now that I'm excited to try Linux, so many of the big players are embracing the steps to erode privacy (AI everywhere... age attestation/verification... telemetry on by default...). It's sad, and I'm just going to "nope" out of any interactions with them.
In anyone in the future is reading this, I ended up vibe-coding a chrome plugin to let me pull the page info as a MCP call. It's working (and I successfully can extract data) using Qwen 3.6 locally (GMKTec EVO-X2, 128GiB RAM).
Thank you for your reply, but I haven't paid for Claude, and I don't plan to with my other subscriptions. Plus, I'm trying to have this be part of my headless automation with my own, local llms. If it weren't hacked together, it wouldn't be appropriate for this website in the first place! LOL
BMus in Piano Performance, Midwestern State University
MS in Computer Science, Midwestern State University
PhD in Computer Science, University of Notre Dame
My YouTube channel where I post videos about CS: https://www.youtube.com/user/coreyp1
The playlist where I create a programming language from scratch (watch video #100 to get an overview of the project): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZqirAnnqaCZ8lT8w7p2PUB7tqrId7d89
My blog that I haven't updaded in forever: https://cscrunch.com