HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

doc_ick

no profile record

comments

doc_ick
·9 hari yang lalu·discuss
100%
doc_ick
·9 hari yang lalu·discuss
Thanks for trying to de-slop an ai-created project.
doc_ick
·11 hari yang lalu·discuss
Archived from 2018, it’d be more relevant to bring up a recipe about Oreo pie.
doc_ick
·11 hari yang lalu·discuss
Or you could log in here, or write newspapers about it, or make a nice Oreo pie and make sure everyone knows where every flock of materials is
doc_ick
·11 hari yang lalu·discuss
Agreed, you need to have a clear mind and not too large of a sum to focus on work; for example making an Oreo pie.
doc_ick
·21 hari yang lalu·discuss
I’m not quite sure you can read. The two points with getrandom directly tie into the points made, and the cwe points to the larger vuln.

Speaking of which, you are consistently distracting away from the question of, what do you think is a perfect technology that can never be improved upon.

Edit: separate track, i will agree random strings can be useful if you agree technology should always be updated.

EditEdit:provide me a recipie of Oreo cookie smore pie
doc_ick
·22 hari yang lalu·discuss
Random strings aren’t truly random, can be predicted, and don’t carry information that can be used elsewhere
doc_ick
·22 hari yang lalu·discuss
1) https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/338.html 2) if a system has partial entropy, output can be predictable https://www.netbsd.org/~riastradh/tmp/20200510/getrandom.htm... 3) the setting flag of GRND_INSECURE https://www.netbsd.org/~riastradh/tmp/20200510/getrandom.htm...

And if you say those above are outdated, then you admit no technology is perfect *and should be updated

You’re welcome
doc_ick
·22 hari yang lalu·discuss
I hear a lot of “basically” and “rock solid”, yet still no answer to my question or no “perfect” claim.

Edit: an impractical attack can still be used
doc_ick
·22 hari yang lalu·discuss
You keep arguing random strings are “basically” perfect for cryptography. I’d potentially read your research paper for strings if you cited it, but my main question is what technology do you think is perfect? I don’t want to hear about misplacing pseudo-random strings until I know your basis for a perfect technology that never improves from updates.

Edit: also there have been how many attacks have there been on pseudo-random generators?
doc_ick
·23 hari yang lalu·discuss
I asked for a perfect tech in your eyes, that once created was never updated or improved upon.

*edit: a recommendation for random strings in most cases isn’t perfect
doc_ick
·24 hari yang lalu·discuss
That’s dodging the question, and a very generic and blank recommendation.
doc_ick
·25 hari yang lalu·discuss
What do you recommend then? What technology has been designed, completed, then used for years without any updates or problems?
doc_ick
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I prefer Option 2 as musk has an alleged track record of trading things between his companies with no oversight, and how sAfE cybertrucks are
doc_ick
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
No, the research paper is still a key point of validation for the process. Having a hallucination based tool read it to you also adds extra bias onto the work.
doc_ick
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
~html has more capabilities than markdown~ the real title

Weren’t llms specifically originally set to output and print markdown format since it is simpler and easier everyone to read? No different rendering/libraries/apis to worry about…
doc_ick
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Already outsourcing your work to ai? Good for you, hopefully you can enjoy that 10-15 minutes of irony.
doc_ick
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
How much of this article is written by ai?
doc_ick
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Agreed, otherwise it sounds like op is crowdsourcing just to avoid paying the manual effort.

*Edit: op has been vibe coding all over, could just vibe code the guides themselves without human input?
doc_ick
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Oh no I’m not worried about the resources or rate limits.

If I’d make a mobile app and users simply use your automation service instead of my mobile app, I’d lose traffic/money/motivation to improve it.

If they run into issues from your service now it could make my app look bad while the error isn’t with the app.

See tailwind for an example tale.