highduc

no profile record

comments

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

So?

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

>A lot of the initial speculation is that the coup was led by Ilya over AI safety concerns, but that seems unlikely now given how quickly he switched sides.

For more context: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38362301

If the above is real then it kind of changes things.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

Interesting. Also what a clusterfuck.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

At this point this whole thing looks more like

>tech billionaires and mammoth corporation use the full weight of social media to exert control over a non-profit organization, and also telling us what to think about the event without having enough info.

The framing in these articles is insane.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

You get my point. With all due respect to Sam's technical abilities, if I'd have to choose one to make AI/AGI I'd clearly go with Ilya. The fact that Sam goes to Microsoft doesn't mean all OpenAI is moves to Microsoft. That is the point I'm trying to make

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

I was not talking about the success but the core tech those employees are working with. That's what really matters isn't it?

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

This article is that Obama meme awarding a medal to himself. Also I don't get it, OpenAI's product was technically made by Ilya who's still at OpenAI.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

For me the real danger of AGI (even aligned), fast forward in some future where robotics are similarly advanced to create full human motion replacement, is that it will dilute if not completely replace human work, ANY kind. And the real danger doesn't come from AGI itself, comes from the psychopaths having control of it.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

Non-profit org man. We still don't know what happened and their actions might align to their mission. Weird how quite a few people with your narrative mistake it for a for-profit company.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

I don't get it, how is OpenAI "dead"? Are you going to stop using ChatGPT or?

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

He may have no choice but to try to play this card at this point? The stakes are pretty high I suppose. You don't just give up such level of potential control over this tech.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

Trading privacy for safety.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

Yeah clearly, at least I have no clue what really happened and don't feel like I have enough info to put anything together at this point.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

The amount of money and power their products might offer makes it pretty desirable. Theoretically there should be no limit to the amount and type of shenanigans that are possible in this particular situation.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

>And it might not exist next week if the board doesn't resign.

Huh? Can't they just hire new people instead? They are a non profit org after all.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

Scientists are easily blindsided by psychos dealing with enormous amounts of money and power. They also happen to suck at politics.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

Captcha in 2023

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

>with a non-profit vestigial organ that will now be excised.

If this happens I'm not trusting any other non-profit org ever again.

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

But do they build for free? Or do they build for money, and especially for the perspective of even more money?

3 tahun yang laludiscuss

But employees are motivated by money and the perspective of more. That kinda casts doubt on the whole angle really. At least in my book.