HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jappgar

356 karmajoined 3 tahun yang lalu

comments

jappgar
·13 jam yang lalu·discuss
The losers spending 8hrs of free time on their phone were just watching TV before all this. Bad parents are not a novel invention.
jappgar
·17 jam yang lalu·discuss
Yes they will approve as many as possible to drive the price of turbines even higher.
jappgar
·17 jam yang lalu·discuss
Same is true if you're reading a newspaper
jappgar
·12 hari yang lalu·discuss
It can only deal in tokens, so you're essentially right that it creates a textual description before describing it back to you. This process is obviously incredibly lossy and details are easily missed
jappgar
·13 hari yang lalu·discuss
I'll see your "government wants biometric surveillance" conspiracy theory and raise you a "pedofiles want to keep kids on social media" theory.
jappgar
·14 hari yang lalu·discuss
I agree. Very little in here specifically applies to fintech except the ledgering and rounding parts, which are pretty light.

I would prefer to read a defense of something more radical like "database per account." Something that has unique tradeoffs within fintech.

Also, the main advice I would give to fintech engineers/founders is to take risk and compliance seriously from day one.

Financial systems are based around trust. If you don't provably mitigate risks you will lose trust and, eventually, your entire business.
jappgar
·15 hari yang lalu·discuss
Correct.
jappgar
·16 hari yang lalu·discuss
Hey don't bring Flash into this
jappgar
·16 hari yang lalu·discuss
Ironically I don't think AI is this tone deaf.
jappgar
·17 hari yang lalu·discuss
Is this supposed to be surprising?
jappgar
·17 hari yang lalu·discuss
> refuse to use the s word

strike?
jappgar
·18 hari yang lalu·discuss
I'm assuming they pay high percentages to processors on deposits to cover the losses.

Then they recoup that (and more) in withdrawal fees
jappgar
·23 hari yang lalu·discuss
Another reason is that we don't actually know what negative effects regular "scans" might have.

Actually in some cases we do know. Regular xrays are harmful, for example.
jappgar
·23 hari yang lalu·discuss
And for what? Is it just morbid curiosity or is there something you plan to do with that information.
jappgar
·23 hari yang lalu·discuss
Today only I'll sell you 6GB of data for 6000USD its a steal. Buy now.
jappgar
·24 hari yang lalu·discuss
Most requests are reads and letting someone use an invalidated session for reads for 30 seconds on a shortlived token isn't the end of the world, especially considering that the exact invalidation timing and its propagation is already somewhat arbitrary.

For rarer privileged actions you can check a token revocation list.
jappgar
·26 hari yang lalu·discuss
Julian Assange and Mark Zuckerberg were two nerds on either side of the privacy spectrum in the twenty-teens.

One was framed and tortured, the other was given an empire.

The message was received.

We now only have the Zuckerberg type.
jappgar
·27 hari yang lalu·discuss
The more guarantees you put in place the more people believe the system is infallible and the more valuable the exploit becomes.

If "signed" photos were treated as incontrovertible truth, then you'll just have people 3d printing hyper realistic masks or something.
jappgar
·29 hari yang lalu·discuss
It takes considerable energy to train models and run inference. You can't dismiss AI generated content as "low effort", but you can dismiss it as a wasteful diversion.
jappgar
·bulan lalu·discuss
Robots. That's why they're obsessed with AI and robotics.