HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jsomers

no profile record

Submissions

The paper computer

jsomers.net
291 points·by jsomers·3 bulan yang lalu·89 comments

Can you reverse engineer our neural network?

blog.janestreet.com
317 points·by jsomers·5 bulan yang lalu·204 comments

A Coder Considers the Waning Days of the Craft (2023)

newyorker.com
2 points·by jsomers·5 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

I design with Claude more than Figma now

blog.janestreet.com
1 points·by jsomers·5 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

A coder considers the waning days of the craft (2023)

newyorker.com
2 points·by jsomers·6 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

The Case That A.I. Is Thinking

newyorker.com
5 points·by jsomers·7 bulan yang lalu·5 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by jsomers·7 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

The McPhee method for writing deeply reported nonfiction

jsomers.net
199 points·by jsomers·11 bulan yang lalu·53 comments

comments

jsomers
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Yeah, and it's really worth checking out https://dynamicland.org/, because Bret Victor is actually doing this -- slash pointing the way to what such a world could look like. It just seems like now might be a good time for specific smaller parts of that vision to be carved off and developed further. I say that largely because of the advances in multimodal AI, which maybe haven't been fully applied yet in this area.
jsomers
·7 bulan yang lalu·discuss
This was posted when it came out here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45802029. It generated a lot of comments -- more heat than light, possibly -- and I wonder if instead of just taking the title as a jumping-off point, folks could engage with the meat of the article itself.

(I wrote the article. I'm a longtime HN user. I find that threads here lately have gotten very jumpy-offy -- commenters use a specific article about e.g. icebergs melting to have a conversation about climate change and climate change denial, instead of to talk about the merits of the particular article -- and I was hoping to nudge folks to read the full piece, then comment on specific parts of it. I'm not sure that'll work but figured it's worth a try!)