HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

lizkm

no profile record

comments

lizkm
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Pretty arrogant of you to assume that liberals aren't arming themselves to protect against people that have been threatening violence and advocating for coups to overturn democratic results.
lizkm
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
As if China does not resemble a mass-surveillance state dystopia already? I'm not sure "improving living conditions" in a country where The Party dictates every aspect of life is something to aspire to.
lizkm
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
>One has to wonder why they are so focused on [Combating far right extremism and misinformation] when it's clearly designed to benefit the overall establishment system status-quo

Far right extremism is a threat to the status quo of open and tolerant liberal democracy, yes, you are correct.
lizkm
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
>If you provide service to everybody, then you provide service to unsavory types. That doesn't mean you cater to them.

Read what the CEO has to say about jewish people [0]

[0] https://www.huffpost.com/entry/rob-monster-epik-gab-neo-nazi...
lizkm
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Not sure how one could conceivably say this is a black hat leak for profit. It's very clearly politically motivated and intended to target the customers who use the registrar for right wing political purposes.

I don't really care if a company run by a notorious antisemite [0] gets its less savoury customers doxxed and harassed.

[0] https://www.huffpost.com/entry/rob-monster-epik-gab-neo-nazi...
lizkm
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Cigarettes aren't highly regulated because they are addictive, they are regulated because they literally rot and kill your internal organs.

"Some people feel bad about their bodies after viewing social media" doesn't nearly meet the threshold of measurable harm that tobacco does. And algorithmic promotion can be positive, unlike the universally health-corrosive effects of cigarettes.
lizkm
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Expecting draconian regulations on social media to work is a recipe for failure. How many billions wasted on the war on drugs? People are always going to want to view extremist content, see beautiful people that cause body image issues, etc.

If people didn't want to see it, they wouldn't click on it. Banning it or regulating it is not going to change that, it's just going to cause it to shift elsewhere. It's human nature.
lizkm
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Pornography does not cause you to go into spasms and die though. You being unable to control yourself does not justify undue restrictions on other people. The internet should not be ceded to nanny staters and morality police.