That's because this product isn't for you then. My team has been evaluating vector databases for years and everything on the VectorChord page resonated with me. We run one of the world's largest vector databases and we'll likely benchmark vectorchord to see if it lives up to its promises here.
Any OF models would be met with HN users over-explaining their own economics to them and how it's a terrible business that'll never work. These models will also learn they don't even have a moat to differentiate themselves from other offerings and should keep their development jobs. :)
I think it's important to contemplate the human component of mergers. If lots of gainfully employed people get let go so that fewer people can consolidate expenses and raise shareholder value I think it should be considered as part of the decision making framework.
We have very close relationships with Trust and Privacy officers at both our payment providers and AWS. They love what we’re doing and have facilitated introductions to other organizations.
Our claims aren’t in personality/publicity rights it’s on model release forms. Literally an unauthorized model that they are commercializing from a non-public setting.
There is value in the Takedown service but our major value is the facial recognition search.
If you think that people won’t pay $25 to remove all the images and videos uploaded to porn across the internet with a few button clicks then you’ve clearly never had to worry about such things.
Someone would have to spend $500k to scan and process the internet before they could come close to offering the coverage we could for $25.
It’s incredible what kind of bubble HN lives in sometimes.
EDIT: also, we limit it to two free DMCA’s to prevent abuse and we have a tutorial on our site on how to do your own DMCA for free.
We’re not running an exploitative business, we’re helping people.
We aren’t abusing it. These people featured in this non-consensual imagery haven’t signed model release forms so running ads on their content without reimbursing them is a commercial infringement.
We’re not arbitrarily sending DMCA’s to get things taken down. Our copyright holders haven’t approved of and are not benefiting from the financial gains of their stolen works.
It sounds cold to phrase it that way, but that’s how America protects its people, only as a function of money.
Totally agree with everything you said, I just want to remind people that half of the story of DMCA is that we have really poor controls over our privacy and ironically DMCA is one of our only tools.
There are no privacy laws that protect people from these kinds of uploads. We only have DMCA. Your vitriol only proves a lack of education around these topics.
If someone wanted to buy it, I'm sure reality defender has protection especially because you can predict adversarial guesses.
It would be trivial for them to build "this user is sending progressively more realistic, rapid responses" if they haven't built that already.