Or you could say it the other way around:
Even leading scientists are susceptible to letting emotions get the best of them and double-down defending their personal investments into things.
"A scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."
- Max Planck.
Things like this have been known for a while, and for some reason now being talked about in mainstream.
Talking about / showing things as an early "adopter" (ECHELON, Snowden stuff pre-Snowden, etc.) tends to get people angry and you slandered with vitriolic things like "conspiracy theorist" so the juice is not worth the squeeze.
Yes "nothing is free" yet we still often call these things free. It definitely wasn't free for him to make it.
Average person on here views those hours as billable if they were to do it themselves, when they make decisions about what to do, or alternatives (opportunity cost).
Maybe he should charge them consulting rates for this PDF (and not take their -- correction: an -- email. The horror).
It's only because this is HN that it's even a discussion.
At first you were racist by being racist.
Then you were racist for not wanting to repeal anti-racist laws.
Just like how not having blind auditions for orchestras was racist (not hiring enough minorities). And now having blind auditions is racist (not hiring enough minorities).
"A scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." - Max Planck.