HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

madawei2699

no profile record

Submissions

[untitled]

1 points·by madawei2699·29 hari yang lalu·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by madawei2699·2 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by madawei2699·4 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by madawei2699·4 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

Show HN: AI-Native Architecture Series (Open-Source)

github.com
3 points·by madawei2699·5 bulan yang lalu·3 comments

Show HN: I Stopped Writing Code – The 60/40 Rule for AI-Native Engineering

github.com
2 points·by madawei2699·5 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

Show HN: Constrained DSL for Reliable LLM Decisions

github.com
1 points·by madawei2699·5 bulan yang lalu·1 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by madawei2699·tahun lalu·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by madawei2699·tahun lalu·0 comments

comments

madawei2699
·29 hari yang lalu·discuss
[flagged]
madawei2699
·5 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Thanks JB_5000 — really appreciate you putting it that way. You're spot on: the whole point is constraints over intelligence. Guardrails (DSL, schema, deterministic replay, boring hybrid) are what actually make it production-usable.

On scaling: so far it's handling ~3k trial users + growing paid base with low four-digit RMB yearly infra (queue-driven scale-to-zero, Redis cache, R2 for artifacts). The real bottleneck is still alignment quality (good artifacts + human gates), not the constraint overhead itself. Haven't hit hard walls yet, but I'm sure 10x–100x load will expose new ones.

How about you? Have you seen constrained agents / deterministic layers scale well (or break) at larger sizes? Any guardrails that worked surprisingly well for you?

Thanks again!