It is just a delayed release IMO. They let their favorites get a head start. Now that the market is saturated they release it once the loss of leverage is minimal.
An analogy is to think of this tech as like a card they held onto to play when it suited them.
MIT is toxic. I respect they supposedly have some good engineers coming out of that place, but I don't think as a school they offer much compared to Stanford, USC, etc... Most American schools are now trying to capitalize as well and attempting to beat corporations to the punch in exploiting their students, so it might be a bit unfair to just isolate MIT for that kind of toxic behavior.
Just look at their students debts for example, or "acceptance rates". That metric is abused to justify prestige in a failing educational system whose output can barely compete with _middle schoolers_ of truly developed countries, and even developing countries like China. Stanford for example has this little lottery where they select some poor bastard with chops to market themselves as a merit based school which is hilarious.
If you look at MIT, and other American schools' prestige in the global arena and take into account the state of their educational system, they are a bunch of hoaxers and fraudsters.
The meat of the quality of the output of American higher education is from the strength of foreign students, and not from American systems.
Know what kind of position you are interviewing for. There is no magic guide and checklist that you can use on the fly. But there is a way to make something of a checklist. You have to do your research and from that you will build a set of expectations of the type of questions you will receive.
There are questions you want to receive to prove that you are a fit and that the group is what you expect. You can build this into a start of a checklist. If you feel you can, delve into the differences of what they are showing vs your expectations.
One sure example that may appear ironic is if the questions are too simple or easy vs what you expected. It is almost certainly a trap. One of my co-workers, we will call them B, fell into this trap and was thrown into a very toxic group of queers. B eventually recovered I _think_ but I haven't heard from B for a while. From what I heard though, B has problem using the bathrooms alone now. So be careful out there.
Maybe this is too dark, but you need to understand how serious you need to take your jobs and how you choose your groups ( as well as what kinds of fucked up people are out there that may be interviewing you, etc...).
This seems smart, there doesn't seem to be too much wrong with opening the door to investors. Once the investors start supporting the Tesla M3 and EV entry luxury cars, they will be also interested in investing in the infrastructure to support these kinds of solutions.
If sales and orders continue rising, and he requires investments, then he's already hooked in investors. Tesla might just prove themselves to be the gateway to a new infrastructure model.
How much "drift" do you guys have to deal with when using consumer electronics? I don't imagine the calibration being too difficult or numerous these days. Wi-Fi these days is cheap and of high quality.
It's like the $10,000 dollar hammer, but this is far worse.
With the hammer, government apologists claimed it was to "secretly move money for DoD"... which really means it was the DoD and military just giving themselves a shit ton of money.
The US is very corrupt. The DoD dodged a bullet when 9/11 happened because that was the day they were going to be put under investigation.
Sadly enough, nothing happened at all, and this type of political graft is very common among the military and their politicians.
A recent case for example is the head of University of California who does not even belong there and is completely ill qualified to lead a college. Her only real experience is as a _spy chief_ for the military and DHS.
This type of political graft resulting from military connections is going to be far more common and invade further into civilian infrastructures. It's not like the NSA's complete treasonous behavior in spying on the US citizens they're supposed to protect isn't bad enough... that isn't even the tip of the iceberg, I'd wager. Before that of course was the CIA funneling drugs into cities to fund their own pockets and programs. Or even the joke of the "war on drugs" which all it was meant to do was control the profit flow of illegal street drugs.
These styles of military programs, also known as soft power projection, directed at the US population and citizens is getting far more common and invasive. These days, it is almost considered the norm.
Yea... Try and spin it on me in this forum, when the reality speaks for itself.
They are just being taken advantage of by trying to hang out and fit in with a heavily antagonistic culture that is very racist against Asians. The amount violence the US inflicted on those Asians is enormous and unequal.
And, I didn't even mention that the JNippons and Koreanas are genetic cousins to the native Americans, many of which were wiped out by the US.
The long-term trend is just apparent in where the US and Russians are taking the direction of those Asians.
It is just naive or dumb to think Google is left alone when they don't give access to the government. Of course they give access, but in the interest of being a vital source of intelligence and data they put on an act.
That is what they get for trying to fit in with the Europeans and whites. They remind me of the Asians in the US that try to hang out with the whites, black, etc... It is a sad sight.
That is why the Chinese in the US are doing much better than the Koreanas and the Nipponese. They are much stronger and don't need to fit in with the lesser cultures. The Koreanas and the Nipponese are just conquered Territories to the Americans. The US bombed and killed millions of civilians in their countries. No wonder they are depressed.
Google got hustled. Nest was a disaster from the start. They are barely even a one-off. The best thing Google got out of their 3.2 billion dollar purchase was a patent troll.
These silicon valley companies made these horrible buyouts in the billions, and they have yet to feel the effects.
Or.. Maybe they are just working on their thug life portfolio? A bit sidetracked at best.
Literally the US can dictate what kind arms they can develop. It is required they comply to receive consideration for US military aid and to remain under the US nuclear umbrella (from other nuclear armed countries like China, India, Russia, etc...).
Umm... how old is this hack? Over a decade ago, one of my friends used to drive a somewhat nice car that he modded and fixed up on his own. He always threw his keys with the alarm dongle thing, etc... in the freezer and I never asked why.
edit: Although his car was still eventually stolen when the thieves used some kind of specialized tools to bend his car's hood. The tool allowed them to bend the hood without triggering the alarm somehow and cut the power sources to the alarms. Then they put it on a repo/tow truck and drove away. I guess he showed his alarm to the wrong hot girl he would always bring around when we all hanged out.
When the police found the car everything was gone except for the car's frame and bent hood.
This is one of the faultier parts of having to answer to share holders. Apple is finding it more difficult to justify having their own entire supply chain rather than relying on other companies (i.e. Intel, IBM, Samsung, etc...)
If they didn't make that horrible mistake of their recent multi-billion dollar purchases, they'd have extra billion atleast towards a fab plant.
I'm laughing at Apple right now. Idiots. You Apple board... are stupid.
An analogy is to think of this tech as like a card they held onto to play when it suited them.