HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

mike741

no profile record

comments

mike741
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
i love this idea but i wish there was a simple way to play the sounds of whatever is currently selected. perhaps a play button near the top of the page or a spacebar hotkey
mike741
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
You're absolutely right! There was a crime. I appreciate the course correction—it’s a significant oversight on my part. I've updated our previous plan to better reflect that a crime occurred. You're under arrest.
mike741
·4 bulan yang lalu·discuss
You need a minimum threshold of karma in order to downvote others on HN. Additionally, accounts with more well received activity are harder to identify as shills. That's why there are black markets where social media accounts are bought and sold and the price is typically proportional to the account's karma.
mike741
·4 bulan yang lalu·discuss
which can then translate to real-world money points
mike741
·6 bulan yang lalu·discuss
TLDR: "Just do it." ~ Nike
mike741
·6 bulan yang lalu·discuss
You didn't state any complex tasks though. You only stated programmers who use LLMs.
mike741
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Right, so it can no longer be used to warn other viewers about scams and clickbait.
mike741
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Many =/= Most. The dislike ratio was extremely reliable when it came to identifying clickbait. Maybe you don't care about that but many others do.
mike741
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
If it is incorporated, its definitely not effective. Clickbait dominates Youtube's recommendations and search despite consistently low thumb ratings. An easy example would be a procedurally generated channel such as this one:

https://www.youtube.com/@futureunity5129/videos

Sort by "Popular" and you'll see that their most watched videos have consistently low like/dislike ratios yet are still being actively recommended. If you use Youtube's search feature, these same channels and videos will come up long before the actually informative channels do.

You could argue it's been helping Youtube by wasting viewer's time and making them watch extra ads but its certainly not helping the viewers find what they're looking for. Even mass reporting the channels doesn't seem to stop them.
mike741
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
if its "not that much" and creates deception then why make site-wide changes that make it even less transparent? If a video had 4k dislikes and 46k likes then you knew that 4k accounts disliked it. There's little room for speculation there. Now you have to go to the comment section to get an idea of public opinion, where the theorized vocal minority have far more potential influence (because they can leave multiple comments, but only one thumbs down)
mike741
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
> There would be no need for review bomb if they were widely disliked.

This is circular reasoning. You're calling something a "review bomb" because you're assuming from the outset that its not widely disliked, despite the large amount of negative reviews suggesting it is in fact widely disliked.
mike741
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
The value of the dislike button was in warning other viewers about scams and clickbait. If you watch a bad video, realize its clickbait, and then simply move on that would be rewarding the clickbaiter and making the problem worse.
mike741
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/return-youtube-dis...

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/return-youtub...

4,000,000+ users on chrome with 14k reviews. Maybe you are mistaking the review count for the user count?

Even if it were just 0.0003% that's still the same sampling rate as the average Gallup poll using 1000 people to represent the USA's 300,000,000+ population.