HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

namenotrequired

1,588 karmajoined 14 tahun yang lalu
Google mail: danamenotrequired

comments

namenotrequired
·4 hari yang lalu·discuss
Even if not a single researcher goes from the US to China, it may still benefit them
namenotrequired
·bulan lalu·discuss
It would be perfectly crumulent if it was explicitly communicated in advance.
namenotrequired
·bulan lalu·discuss
He means it doesn’t make sense for the startup. The comment you’re replying to, is arguing that this point from the gp is a disadvantage instead of an advantage:

> hotel rooms are regular/familiar
namenotrequired
·bulan lalu·discuss
Nitpick: earlier this month ≠ in early May. “Earlier this month” includes yesterday
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
If you’ve ever worked with a stupid but incredibly friendly coworker, the feelings are similar
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
The original title says he “got cheers” which is much less ambiguous than the HN title
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
No. Then you missed the opportunity to make 9k.
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
> How is it misleading if this would be the consumer's cost?

Because it does not say “equivalent of”, it literally says he spent money that he did not spend
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
The author mentions this and links an article that expands on it
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Isn’t calling AMOC “the primary source of warmth for northern Europe” wildly overstated?
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Not OP, but I think their point was the corollary of that.

Yes, obviously bad use of a good tool is dangerous. But correct use of a malfunctioning tool is also dangerous.

Millions of people understand when they get in their car that there’s a tiny chance the car will crash/explode that day through no fault of the driver. Most do not have the knowledge and competence (or even the time) to thoroughly check the engine every day to guarantee that that won’t happen. They get in anyway.

At some point you have to trust in something.
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Thanks for your answers!

> Del Monte was killed by COVID. Canned food sales spiked and they thought that would last, but it didn't.

Why can’t they reduce to their former size? It seems the California plants had been around long before Covid
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
“Attributed to Banksy”? It has his signature and he posted about it on his instagram. What else is needed to confirm the creator?
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I thought even after the merge the Neanderthal genes continued to get rarer, indicating natural selection against them
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
New code has bugs regardless of whether it entered on the same PR or a new one
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
It’s not the same. Presumably public domain works are much more frequently shared on the public internet and therefore much more common in the training set
namenotrequired
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
> There are plenty of old books in the public domain already

Yes but showing that it happens in books in the public domain does nothing to prove that it happens for copyrighted books
namenotrequired
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
The way my company works, it doesn’t break it. You approve and merge, then any suggestions can be implemented in a next PR

That way the average customer doesn’t need to wait for your code style change or edge case fix
namenotrequired
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
We do this too. In my team, my rule is: if it’s better than what’s on master, you approve and merge.

There’s no use making the customer wait for your questions, code style suggestions etc to be addressed.

Even if you request changes, you leave all your comments and make explicit which are the blocking ones and which can be addressed in the future.
namenotrequired
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
But why would they all start at the same time?