HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

nyc111

1,230 karmajoined 13 tahun yang lalu
https://1notes1.online/index.html

Submissions

Physics doesn't explain the universe. Computation does – Stephen Wolfram

youtube.com
1 points·by nyc111·5 hari yang lalu·0 comments

AI and Mathematics Research – Yikes (N.J. Wildberger)

youtube.com
2 points·by nyc111·14 hari yang lalu·0 comments

'Earthset' Is Captured on Video for First Time

nytimes.com
3 points·by nyc111·3 bulan yang lalu·1 comments

Perfect Squares and Pythagorean Triples on the Ulam Spiral

youtube.com
1 points·by nyc111·5 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

Terence Tao: Why I Co-Founded SAIR

youtube.com
1 points·by nyc111·5 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

AI and Education: Generative AI and the Future of Critical Thinking

youtube.com
4 points·by nyc111·5 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

The Simplest Math Problem No One Can Solve – Collatz Conjecture

youtube.com
2 points·by nyc111·6 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

Parabolas and Archimedes - Numberphile

youtube.com
1 points·by nyc111·7 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

The IBM 1401 compiles and runs Fortran II (2018)

youtube.com
3 points·by nyc111·9 bulan yang lalu·1 comments

The Genes That Let Our Ancestors Walk Upright

nytimes.com
3 points·by nyc111·11 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

Real numbers as Cauchy sequences don't work (2015)

youtube.com
1 points·by nyc111·11 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

A Proportionality Hypothesis for modern physics – N J Wildberger

youtube.com
1 points·by nyc111·12 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

Eromanga Sea

en.wikipedia.org
3 points·by nyc111·tahun lalu·0 comments

comments

nyc111
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I read all the comments in the times post and no one mentions that this is due to the motion of the Artemis II. On the moon there is no "earthrise" or "earthset", only a yearly wobble. On the earth the moon rises and sets because of the earth's rotation. I guess the editors of the NYT knew this so that they put the "earthset" in quotes.
nyc111
·8 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I was able to open it in archive
nyc111
·8 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I use nano a lot but this page is not opening for me. Is someone else having the same problem?
nyc111
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
A beautiful book by Michel Pastoureau, Blue: The History of a Color (2001), the same content as the article in book form.

https://www.amazon.com/Blue-History-Color-Michel-Pastoureau/...
nyc111
·11 bulan yang lalu·discuss
More detailed video of Plimpton 322 from the authors of the paper https://youtu.be/L24GzTaOll0?si=sNdwKiM7uYXbzVfL
nyc111
·11 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I tried but his pages do not have links to a home page or other posts
nyc111
·11 bulan yang lalu·discuss
It looks like they chose to use the "universal gravitational constant" "k" instead of Newton^s constant, "G": p.23, "k^2 = universal gravitational constant, 1.32452139x10^20, m^3/(sec^2)(sun mass units)"

I think "k" was also known as "Gaussian gravitational constant" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_gravitational_constan...

But the value and unit of "k" given in the Wikipedia page is different. Do you know what NASA document means by "universal gravitational constant" in modern sense?
nyc111
·11 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Mathematician Norman Wildberger has been criticizing the embrace of infinitiy by modern mathematicians for decades: https://www.youtube.com/@njwildberger/search?query=infinity