HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

peterarmstrong

no profile record

comments

peterarmstrong
·tahun lalu·discuss
"That single gram of silica gel could have an internal surface area of eight hundred square meters—the size of almost two basketball courts."

This reads like something from The Three Body Problem :)
peterarmstrong
·tahun lalu·discuss
What, hackathons require admission applications these days? Holy crap I'm getting old...
peterarmstrong
·tahun lalu·discuss
Write an in-progress book about some niche = lead magnet for this type of work :)

(disclosure: founder of Leanpub)
peterarmstrong
·tahun lalu·discuss
Yeah, I was going to write the same thing.
peterarmstrong
·tahun lalu·discuss
When you realize it was supposed to be a graphic novel, that makes the over-the-top scenes make so much more sense. It's a comic book without the comics.

(I also think it's great, btw.)
peterarmstrong
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Also, Asakusa Kid (biopic of him) is a really good movie, and Hana-bi is a great movie as well.
peterarmstrong
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
phalates
peterarmstrong
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
No. You discuss it with your manager, and you do it at the appropriate time. Having both created, refactored and deleted lots of technical debt over the past 25 years, trust me: you just don't get to go rogue because "you're the engineer". If you do that, it might turn into "you were the engineer".

What if you spend a week or month refactoring something that needs a quick fix now and is being deleted in 1-2 years? That's waste, and if you went rogue, it's your fault. Besides, you always create added QA burden with large refactoring (yes even if you have tests), and you should not do that without a discussion first--even if you're the founder.

Communicate with your manager and (if they agree) VP if needed, and do the right thing at the right time.
peterarmstrong
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Maybe the young men measured have low enough testosterone ranges that the high/low cycles have less effect, but the more likely explanation is that the methodology of this study is pretty laughable...