HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

piker

4,807 karmajoined 12 tahun yang lalu
https://tritium.legal/blog

https://x.com/urandomd

https://www.linkedin.com/in/tritium-drew-miller

[email protected]

Submissions

Noroboto: Lying Fonts and Mitigation in Rust

tritium.legal
87 points·by piker·2 bulan yang lalu·36 comments

TV Pickup

en.wikipedia.org
3 points·by piker·2 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

Captain Midnight satellite broadcast intrusion

en.wikipedia.org
4 points·by piker·3 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

Redlining: Value over Artifacts

tritium.legal
5 points·by piker·5 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

If you choose the homogenous mind, you are superfluous and will be cut out

geohot.github.io
1 points·by piker·5 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

Thanks for All the Frames: Rust GUI Observations

tritium.legal
9 points·by piker·5 bulan yang lalu·1 comments

COM Like a Bomb: Rust Outlook Add-in

tritium.legal
102 points·by piker·7 bulan yang lalu·68 comments

Jury trials scrapped for crimes with sentences of less than three years

bbc.co.uk
35 points·by piker·7 bulan yang lalu·18 comments

Legal's Jane Street

tritium.legal
3 points·by piker·9 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

Ideas on Glitching in Rust

tritium.legal
7 points·by piker·9 bulan yang lalu·8 comments

Updating Desktop Rust

tritium.legal
65 points·by piker·9 bulan yang lalu·41 comments

(Figuratively) Eating Tritium

tritium.legal
3 points·by piker·9 bulan yang lalu·5 comments

Thoughts on the Word Spec in Rust

tritium.legal
53 points·by piker·9 bulan yang lalu·23 comments

Parallelism with Tokio

tritium.legal
1 points·by piker·9 bulan yang lalu·1 comments

The Network Drive Issue

tritium.legal
4 points·by piker·9 bulan yang lalu·0 comments

comments

piker
·kemarin dulu·discuss
Because it’s uncomfortable to see decades of work copied so trivially.
piker
·kemarin dulu·discuss
Which you will necessarily have if they’ve completed a Rust rewrite.
piker
·8 hari yang lalu·discuss
Okay I tend to agree with the CivPro analysis here, but the parent was probably more concerned with the result on the merits.
piker
·10 hari yang lalu·discuss
What?
piker
·12 hari yang lalu·discuss
This makes no sense. Masa has at least 2 extraordinary investments and Zuck bought Insta for 1 billion USD.
piker
·15 hari yang lalu·discuss
So vibe coding = copy/paste from SO = interpreter with GC = compiler = punch cards. Got it.
piker
·16 hari yang lalu·discuss
Makes sense. I was looking for a link from the main site and noticed there wasn't one. A great leave-behind for sales. Nice job.
piker
·16 hari yang lalu·discuss
Thanks for sharing that. Very cool - was this sales product that you decided to release or has it always been public?
piker
·16 hari yang lalu·discuss
Oxide hitting stride just in time for the memory crisis. I hope they can sustain because they have the coolest stuff, and the podcast is great.

I guess the world of atoms is still hard enough that you can publish an interactive spec of your product and not have to worry about it being immediately copied.
piker
·16 hari yang lalu·discuss
It's so interesting to read comments like this and contrast them with the "don't read the code" type of vibes out right now. It feels like half of the developer world is optimizing low-level struct packing and the other half is YOLO'ing 300 KLOC Electron apps. Very confusing.
piker
·17 hari yang lalu·discuss
I tend to agree with the title but the content seems both AI generated and somewhat dated. The feels 20% faster but actually 19% slower I believe is a few years old at this point. I'm a skeptical as the next but I think it would hard to find a metric on which modern LLMs make devs "19% slower".
piker
·17 hari yang lalu·discuss
Yes, that's right. The folks in this thread just got really worked up thinking that I disagreed with that point, which distracted from my message which was about the A pillar.
piker
·18 hari yang lalu·discuss
Yes, obviously this is what is required.

> and there’s a pedestrian crossing in front of me

This is wrong. You have to do it every time because the pedestrian is in your blind spot.
piker
·18 hari yang lalu·discuss
My experiences have been at around 5mph. Again, it's not speed.

If you watch the video in the post you will understand. The person is just invisible to the driver and they're travelling around the same very low speed.
piker
·18 hari yang lalu·discuss
It's not a speed issue. They're in a blind spot. Your brain tells you that you can see everything, but it's incorrect.

My experiences have been under slow circumstances only. And that makes sense because the individual "lingers" in the blind spot (and perhaps matches your speed) if you're going slow. If you were going fast, the blind spot would be moving much faster and you would see them.
piker
·18 hari yang lalu·discuss
Yes, I agree with both of those statements. If you read the original statement before the "tut tut" response, you will note that I was only suggesting the A pillars introduce dangerous blind spots. I understand how that could be confused on other platforms, but I expected folks on HN to extend the benefit of the doubt that posters are not generally oblivious to the law. So the conversation derailed.
piker
·18 hari yang lalu·discuss
I think I've just lost 10 IQ points in this thread.

YES! OF COURSE. I SAID IT'S A LIABILITY. I AM SHARING INFORMATION, PERHAPS TO AFFECT FUTURE CONSUMER CHOICE.
piker
·18 hari yang lalu·discuss
Of course it would! That's the whole point.

People shouldn't enter the road until it's clear they've been seen.

I'm not sure what you're missing here guy.

I've said the A bar is a liability because of the blind spot it introduces.

Your response was that the person in the road has the right of way. This is known.

Somehow I give immigrants a bad name because I acknowledge that it is difficult to manage people who assert their right-of-way into blind spots.

It's called a blind spot for a reason. How can one yield to something they by definition don't see?
piker
·18 hari yang lalu·discuss
This is such a British response.

Obviously that's what the law says, yes. But if they hop into someone's blind spot, it won't matter to their family much that they were in the right.
piker
·18 hari yang lalu·discuss
Those A pillars are MASSIVE liabilities in the UK where people just hop right out onto "zebra crossings" expecting the right-of-way to be yielded to them.

On a number of occasions I have nearly hit people who I simply could not see crossing in my Volvo XC90 due to these pillars. I've been driving for nearly 30 years in the US and UK and have never felt anything like it.

[edit: for future readers, please note that I am not saying it would be legal or correct to hit these people.

I am saying precisely that the A pillars on the XC90 are dangerous as they introduce blind spots that I've never experienced before. We test drove the vehicle, and they weren't apparent during that test drive. I am now responsible for them.

Down in this thread you will read some responses that seem confused about that point. No, it is not legal to run people over in the road. You will be at fault. No, that doesn't make it smart to jump into the road until it's clear that the traffic has yielded you your lawful right of way. IAAL]