Meandering, pointless, and ultimately futile without a readily-accessible thesis? Absolutely.
But the fact is, nobody single-handedly builds much of anything of consequence anymore. To call out the architecture metaphor is absolutely necessary! But perhaps for different reasons.
I'd be much more willing to trust what a society builds if everyone involved had a voice. Do I get to own my work when I design for Blizzard? Do I get agency over what I've built? And where does this end?
Technicians and a minority of engineers alike raised concerns about O-Rings before a certain disaster... If only we gave them some level of oversight over their own work, the Challenger Disaster would never have happened.
To suggest that any O-Rings anywhere are the responsibility/property of those NASA engineers is equally inane as divorcing the creator from their work. And yet, under our current intellectual property laws, this is too often the reality.
The sole architect is a strawman of a metaphor outside of very specific contexts. And even within them - who trained this architect? What reference documents do they use? Who assigned the purpose for the building? While these inputs are not enough to carry ownership, they are enough to quit pretending some lone figure is a "creative genius" that cannot be outperformed by a team on larger-scale works.