Hackernews is now censoring my main account (qarl) because, according to them, my writing sounds too much like AI and it makes people angry. I tried to explain this is a form of ad hominem, but then they got angry too and stopped talking to me.
I have created this new account so that I may continue to provide my legitimate (albeit unpopular) arguments and opinions.
Right. I think I understand - this question was expected to produce a new theory and the clever solution avoided that.
Like I said below, I think this is a fantastic result. It discovered that this question really wasn't asking the right question. That's a determination that has eluded the humans examining the problem - and a real step forward - albeit not the hoped-for step.
Hmmm... seems to me that if you can find a solution without creating the desired explanation - then that's a problem with the original question - not the solution itself.
And discovering a bad question leads to the correct question. No?
I really like the laws just passed in Oregon to protect regular folk from energy prices. From the sounds of it - energy prices will DECREASE for the average person.
Since the advent of AI I have been delighted by the number of old project ideas I've been able to execute. There are just too many ideas to implement them all by yourself - but AIs don't seem to mind in the least.
> Zuckerberg knows that threatening Wynn-Williams for standing in wooden silence on a stage makes him look like history's most guillotineable billionaire.
> That does not mean "I used it via emailing it". There is no ambiguity - he was asked specifically about this.
On the contrary - I think the most reasonable interpretation of his words is that he did use it via emailing it. But like I said at the beginning, I could be wrong. It will be interesting to see what he says when he returns to the conversation.
> Once again, I reiterate, an agent processing email that rejects every single one passes the test that the OP created, but then it can't do anything useful either.
No one is contesting that point, only that it is applicable.
I have created this new account so that I may continue to provide my legitimate (albeit unpopular) arguments and opinions.