HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

rapht

no profile record

comments

rapht
·4 bulan yang lalu·discuss
This article omits so many negatives from the "cyclist's paradise" vision of Hidalgo's 2 terms that I don't know where to start. Families are the first casualties: the Paris metro is nowhere near accessible to strollers except if you are willing to go to the chiropractor after each week end, and using your car - hell, even parking your family car - is a no go as soon as there is some kind of hipster sports event or just as soon as you are after 10am on week end mornings. Local parks and generally streets are so dirty that you have to wash your children from head to toe as soon as they have set foot outside. And I'm not even talking about used seringes and broken glass in certain parts of the city. I'm actually so ashamed of my city at this point.
rapht
·4 bulan yang lalu·discuss
That is the right question to ask. My temptation is to respond "Obsession with nature is destroying humanity's prospects." Now what?
rapht
·6 bulan yang lalu·discuss
This is an S4. Last S4 event was in October 2003.
rapht
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Sorry if that sounds offensive, but you are being a bit shortsighted here. The theory just says that shareholder value serves both as a guide to what a business should do, and as a measure of how good it has done, because that measure encompasses all others. Which is debatable but far from stupid: do you really think Apple would have sold so many i* had they been ugly? Do you really think that angry people demanding taxes, regulations, etc don't affect how businesses decide to actually go and maximize shareholder value? The actual real absent in Friedman's reasoning is "eventually": externalities always come to haunt the shareholder value, the question is when do they become tangible enough that this aligns with society's perception of those externalities.
rapht
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Countless Buddhist books explore this in thorough detail.