HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

rikkert

no profile record

comments

rikkert
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
ctrl-f mirror here
rikkert
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
whoosh
rikkert
·8 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I moved away from Grafana to Axiom and have not looked back
rikkert
·8 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Thanks!

Which OpenTherm device would you recommend?
rikkert
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Let me guess, you use docker?
rikkert
·tahun lalu·discuss
Good luck when the car is stripped for parts within 24h
rikkert
·tahun lalu·discuss
Yeah, that's really a dick move.
rikkert
·tahun lalu·discuss
I actually followed this specific elemental diet for two weeks to treat my hydrogen SIBO, unfortunately without success. I would not recommend this to anybody unless it's absolutely your last chance. I was constantly hungry, cold and lethargic. The shakes taste /terrible/ so I wouldn't really call it palatable. I shiver just thinking about it. I'm sure it works for some people, and I'm happy for them.
rikkert
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
This reminds me of the "etilqs_" files. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36302805
rikkert
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
always has been...
rikkert
·2 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Michael Crichton’s State of Fear is a prominent example of climate science denial wrapped in a techno-thriller narrative. In the book, he portrays mainstream climate science as alarmist and driven by political motives rather than factual evidence. Crichton uses the plot to imply that climate change fears are exaggerated, fueled by a coalition of media, scientists, and activists with hidden agendas. Despite claiming to be based on scientific data, the book misrepresents studies, cherry-picks data, and cites outlier opinions to undermine the overwhelming consensus on human-caused climate change. The novel’s presentation has been criticized for promoting misinformation and distorting the complexities of climate science to fit a skeptical narrative.