HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

roadrunna

no profile record

Submissions

Ask HN: Are YOU eating too much?

5 points·by roadrunna·3 tahun yang lalu·8 comments

comments

roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
> Were I processing my solid waste for the garden (with soldier fly larvae or heat, etc) we'd have some decent, though costly, humanure (I do use my urine for the compost pile).

Love this <3, great idea. Are you taking any meds that might change the compost in some way? I used to take Amphetamines for/against my ADHD for a while and the urine did indeed have a negative impact on the soil! As well as too much vitamin B for too long. The soild "burned"/killed the seeds.

I'm not asking because of climate change, actually, even though it is indeed a relevant reason. I'm asking because there seem to be peculiar connections between functioning/high functioning people and over-eating and rationality vs rationalization, which some former acquaintances are keen on investigating scientifically.
roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
agreed. it's crazy. but 3000 cal a day is incredibly easy if one simply does not care.

Am I correct in assuming that eating carbs like rice does not amplify your hunger 90 minutes to 2 or 3 hours later?
roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
skinny body despite plenty of food? or normal body composition with 15 - 21 % fat? muscular? weight lifter?
roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
> I recently broke down for an entire day after a judgemental encounter with someone, and learned about Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria

Highly recommend to be radically honest and natural about everything. Every time you get a piece of info about yourself aka natural feedback will immediately enlighten you and help you expand your perspective and move forward.

It's a bit counter-intuitive because so many of us are taught to hold thoughts, words and actions back, but once I stopped doing that, things started to improve massively.

I watched non-ADHD people attempt the same but none of them evolved (my sample is small, 40+ people, I don't have notes on all of them). So far, the only difference I could find, was ADHD-pattern-recognition + that weird ADHD-Naïvité <3
roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
agreed. that realization is when I learned to distrust the lefties ( in Germany ) .... 10 years too late
roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
whats with the crazy links? why not link to the product page directly?

I only get a blank window after clicking on any suggested product, the address bar of which tells me I just a bunch of data to you.
roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Especially young people are still developing, learning, evolving and it is quite normal to be convinced of x and "practice it" until one realizes that the application of x never yields positive results or opens one up to manipulation. In fact, lies and liars can build convincing games and keep you hooked until the day you die.

When it comes to astrology, theory and practice are rather simple. Here's the hyper light version: Once upon a time, civilized communities were small, the gene pool was not yet diverse. "P" identified patterns and created narratives around these patterns. Children were parented and socialized using these narratives and so it seemed like these patterns were indeed natural occurrences. "V" didn't like the pattern her child was supposedly born under and raised it differently. Naturally, the child broke the patterns and the narrative. "Only" the children, who grew up close to "V" or her children kept diverging. Even today, people raise their children under certain narratives, with certain convictions, following patterns in thought, speech and actions. For some of those, more than enough actually, astrology actually hits bullseye more often than not. Some people crave the same kind of "higher order".

It's story telling, neuro-linguistic programming, socialization, marketing, rationality with bogus, unverifiable premises. The logic is sound until people decide to diverge from the norm, opening themselves up to all the variety in the reality outside the walled garden.
roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Well, Tyler is a notorious rationalizer and manipulator. Getting closer to a truthy path would indeed throw him off course.
roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
juuuust you wait for all that disillusionment when they blow the whistle ... on .... ???
roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
All humans get an account on the stock markets and all those accounts are run by robots. [Hyper Light Version] Robot 1: Winning. Robot 2: "I'm losing, need to improve, copy winning moves of robot 1" Robot 1: "I'm losing, improve by adapting to robot 2, wait wtf." Calculating ... Robot 1: "Ok, we're good, I'm not making as much, but this way I will never reach a limit." Robot 2: "Same." Robot 1: "Sweet, wanna jam?"
roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
the working class can fix most of that. and with the help of engineers and scientists, all of it. just give them the financial means.
roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
ok, what if all those old people would get to be fit enough to do stuff?

how long would, or rather _could_, they really chill? All the old people I know wish they were fit enough to be productive and constructive. Drugs and tech will provide this opportunity at some point in the near future.

And what is all this nonsense about social security and pension systems breaking down because the aging population outnumbers the working population??? Think about the exponential function. Everything will get more efficient. Up- and recycling, too. We only consume so much because nature had no way to be more efficient. That's where freaking sentient human beings come into the picture. And AI. I really don't understand the pessimism. If we set up an account on the wall street for every citizen of the planet and let robots do their magic, nobody would lose, everyone would gain. How? "MAGIC". I'm kidding. By ways of the exponential function. You can simulate it yourself. Are there more and more ideas waiting to get on the market or less? To fulfill some desire or need, to fix something that urgently needs fixing? More and more and it will never end. The amount of desires will keep growing. And everybody is misunderstanding the expanding universe. What do you think 100 cooperating billion humans will do? Cooperating in a decentralized way, how most of the economy works, minus the bad top level management and the inefficient ways of the stock markets (the greedy people). When has the human brain become sentient? And so incredibly powerful? After it grew to about 70? 80? 100 billions brain cells?

I'm in my thirties and so is my brother. We now laugh about the ways our parents grew stuff and procured food and stuff. And we realized that it took us so long to understand so many things because our psycho-social environment was too busy being drunk. Which is fine, because the top level management of the professional, local, regional, national and global systems are incredibly incompetent and nobody wants to harm anyone and or go to jail and leave the family worse off. We were slow for multiple reasons but now that we are catching up with the rest, and more importantly, our own potential, things will speed up exponentially.

I take care of the tech side and he gets into the whole sustainable gardening side of things. There is enough water and enough energy sources. The only problem to solve will be the chemicals in water, ground and air, but we are positive that there will be progress in the many approaches we have already found online and offline.

I used to like the term "self-fulfilling prophecy" until I understood it is equivalent to "the purpose of a system is what it does". People get smarter and improve systems. It's a beautiful and never-ending story.
roadrunna
·3 tahun yang lalu·discuss
Sank uu. Before I watch that video I want to say that people, even smart and educated ones, don't understand the exponential function. It applies to everything, including evolution, including the poor, the working class and the ways humans merge with tech and nature. Some people just consciously decide to opt out ... and many of those opt in again, once the solution are convenient enough.

Too much progress has been lost because the top kept the lower 50% below their potential.

And even though the bottom 50 % know very well who is responsible for the state of the planet, the supply chains of the top 13 %, there is no anger and no hate. Most of them will go nuts in terms of productivity, if you give them UBI. If I think of the German-[insert any eastern country], there is not a single person who will sit on their ass and do nothing. And they won't go all self-sufficient and all that jazz, absolutely not. They will join the markets and increase the margins of all the investors. It took me a long time to understand why so many people misinterpreted the potential of the working class. They are proud about what they do, they gladly help and grow anyone's wealth, as long as you give them what they need to thrive. The ROI would be super freaking hot. Don't take my word for it. Try it.