While I'm not typical, I think there are a good number in a similar position:
I've got a house with a roof approaching it's end of life. I use 4MWh/month. My electricity bill goes between $1.2k and 2.4k. A Solar City roof is about equivalent in long term (20-30 yrs) cost with a much better warranty.
28L was dark apart from the X, and the taxiway was lit (albeit with taxi Lane instead of runway lights). Expecting two lit lanes and approaching the one on the right, they certainly saw something "off" but this wasn't a case of pilots choosing to avoid the only lit lane.
If you're looking to add a checksum, why not use an existing format that does things like variable precision and proximity well like geohash (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geohash) and just tack on a checksum digit?
"ezs42cw4" becomes "ezs42cw4 f3" and my client can generate the checksum for me so I just have to verify, rather than enter the last two digits.
I think the reason this attitude exists is because the barrier of entry for engineering is higher and more concrete than it is for marketing, or sales, or product. Most people can walk into an entry-level marketing job and get things done, at least poorly. The same isn't true for an entry-level engineering job-- it's literally a nonstarter if you've never written code.
The truth is, very high level marketers or sales people or product managers are every bit as rare as very high level engineers. And at some point in your career you realize there's a crapton of expertise in those areas you don't have, but others do. And working with them and even deferring to their judgement in those areas gets you a lot better results than getting to be king of the castle.
Ideally, A's credit is discounted and B can only relieve $7 of their debt to you with the $10 A-note (or whatever you value A's debt at). They can choose to take it, or try to collect their $10. Eventually, as people's value of A's debt goes down, splitting a bill with A makes them take a larger portion of it because of their "default" risk.
In person, A thinks that's bullshit and immediately refuses to pay anything, out of principle. People stop splitting with A unless he has the cash on hand and eventually have to kick him out of the house.
Not saying the app works that way. In fact, that's probably why the app doesn't work that way.
What does one do when that person has a rank that exceeds correction? (Other than up and leave)
Say a cofounder who is the classic combination of huge ego and low competency. When addressed about being respectful, a typical response is, "but I don't respect them."
Alternatively, it would be an interesting practice if some section of the project got thousands or tens of thousands of commits. I'd be interested to see a case with 100k defendants.
It's an interesting question of how much resources law enforcement should assign to a case like this.
Many fierce proponents of Bitcoins are the anarchy-leaning libertarians. Its appeal is that government agencies can't track and tax it (or have a tougher time with it)
While I do think a crime has occurred, it feels a bit like collecting a benefit you refused to pay into.
If you're renting your first couple places, absolutely not. But at some point you hit a mark where you have a property manager doing all the day-to-day and a few leasing agents filling vacancies and it becomes as passive as you want it to be.
I bet you a significant portion of the traffic is now coming over the mobile phone. If 40% of the students preferred that site, I'd bet its enough of an improvement to warrant some small-screen browsing.