> where people would say goofy things like they couldn't use Python because it's untyped. That's insane: Python is strongly typed. It's also dynamically typed, which is a different dimension.
hmm maybe you don't understand type-checking INSIDE IDE, NOT during runtime?
security-wise, usb-c is the worst scenario device I've ever seen -- unless you're Apple, you can't make a security-boundary without infringing patent US11205021B2
for laptops, a bad-actor usb-c cable/charger can do so much more, unless your laptop has AI that can distinguish "is this signal really coming from monitor/keyboard/etc ?"
I'd rather have plain-old DC adapters (or usbc to dc)
idk maybe LLM people should only commit what they actually understand, only in bite-size (maximum few lines in few files)
and with at least 1~5 tests that shows the edge cases
drive-by 20-file pull-requests that ultimately end up costing maintainer's burden seems to hit hard here.