Yeah, it's got a real issue with false positives. And I've tried a bunch of other tools (Sapling, ZeroGPT, a few others) and actually GPTZero was the best of the bunch. The others would miss obviously AI generated content that I'd just generated to test them.
I've had a blog post kicking around about this for a while, it's CRAZY how much more expensive AI detection is than AI generation.
In my mind content generated today with AI "tells" like the above and a general zero-calorie-feel that also trip an AI detector are very likely AI generated.
> Technology costs do decrease. However, demand always migrates to the newest, most powerful models.
> People do not:
> Choose GPT-3.5 because it is cheap.
> Select a lower-tier Claude model on purpose.
People definitely can, and do, both things for many workloads. Coding is an obvious exception, but oftentimes a cheaper model is good enough. And businesses that had to spend $5/MTok on a frontier model last year can probably get similar performance and spend $0.50/MTok or less today.
Yeah it reads like it, and if a random AI detector (GPTZero) is to be believed it's pretty much all AI generated.
Crazy that nobody can be bothered to get rid of the obvious AI-isms "This isn't just for...", "The Challenges (And How We Handle Them)", "One PR. One review. One merge. Everything ships together." It's an immediate signal that whoever wrote this DGAF.