HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

throwaway0x2

no profile record

comments

throwaway0x2
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
[flagged]
throwaway0x2
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
It's also why they weaponize "wokeism". They can virtue signal around changing the "master" branch to "main", and then pat themselves on the back and show their leftist employees they're on their side all while working directly with DoD, ICE, etc.
throwaway0x2
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
>Why is it taken as an obvious fact that said female, LGBT, and Black students are wrong about free speech?

Because de facto (and de jure) they are.

>Why are they clearly indoctrinated?

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-cod...

>Why not ask them why they don't support it?

FIRE literally does exactly that.

>Perhaps they have a well-considered opinion on the matter?

This made me audibly chuckle. Undergraduate students with pronouns in their Twitter profiles having a well-considered opinion on free speech? Press X to DOUBT.
throwaway0x2
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
I can't stand using Asana. The search sucks, the organization sucks, you can never find what you're looking for, the UI has some of the worst SNR I've ever see. I hate that I'm forced to use it, and that it's being used as a horrible ticket management platform.

VC money is a hell of a drug.
throwaway0x2
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
I think at this point we need to stop talking about free speech and start talking about "free speech that is not clearly false and does not harrass or attempt to incite violence."

We've never had unfettered right to free speech in America - as everyone knows, you can't shout fire in a crowded theater. The idea that you should be able to freely spread harmful lies (Blacks don't commit a disproportionate amount of crimes against Asians, nuclear energy is dangerous, etc.) is what's the problem.

The left takes the phrase "free speech" and purposely misuses it (I mean the smart ones do, since they understand that all speech is not free, free speech comes from the government and not corporations, etc. - the dumb ones just take cues from the misleading use of the phrase by the smart ones). When they can't spread lies or cause harm or say whatever they want on Tumblr/Twitter/etc., they cry free speech, even though they know the speech they're referring to isn't Constitutionally protected.

It's the same thing that they do with Black Lives Matter/Stop Asian Hate. They willfully misinterpret BLM to mean "Blacks are under attack by Whites" where it clearly means "defund the police, white people are to blame for everything, math is racist, nuclear families are racist, etc."

It's just tough when a huge part of the country has no compunctions against dishonesty, delusionally disregarding facts, etc. if it helps them get or maintain power.
throwaway0x2
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
[flagged]
throwaway0x2
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
>A strike, by definition, cannot be illegal.

Wrong. A strike, by definition, as actually defined in federal law, can indeed be illegal.

>It's an established form of protest which may or may not lead to firing.

Wrong. It's an established form of protest which may or may not result in criminal fillings because it is illegal federally for federal employees.

>Despite the results of the strike, the protest itself is not illegal, nor is walking out of a job.

Despite the results of the strike, the protest itself is illegal, as is walking out of federal jobs (in a strike).

You literally can't be any more wrong.
throwaway0x2
·5 tahun yang lalu·discuss
SSH/SOCKS tunnel is not TCP over TCP.