I had unused token in claude code so that I wanted burn that overnight.
Three agents were writing the future with 3 different perspective. It turned out that human kind did not perish but still had same problem between humans again for 200 years.
I actually did not use prompts here. It is actual calculation from the python lunar and it cast the result to LLM which you use. The LLM has the old books such as giving you your fortune following lunar year calculation. Have a fun with it!
That's a fascinating idea! Hangul is indeed compositional — 한 = ㅎ + ㅏ + ㄴ — so in theory you could assign meaning to individual jamo components.
But in practice, breaking syllables into jamo would make keywords less readable, which goes against Hangul's design goal. And considering how AI-assisted coding works today, fully named descriptive keywords actually reduce errors — LLMs perform better with explicit, unambiguous tokens than with cryptic symbol compositions.
So Han leans toward more descriptive Korean keywords rather than shorter symbolic ones. Readability over brevity.
Interesting direction to think about though — thanks for the question.
Three agents were writing the future with 3 different perspective. It turned out that human kind did not perish but still had same problem between humans again for 200 years.
Let me have a star if you enjoy this post.
Thank you.