HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

ycombigators

no profile record

comments

ycombigators
·9 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Always...? Lol.
ycombigators
·9 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Women are as much biological sex robots as men. We've all see tinder data. Connection is just a proxy for whatever 'protect my offspring' is in base pairs.
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
[dead]
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
[dead]
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
[dead]
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
[dead]
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Yes, it's done.

You get what you asked for, or you didn't sufficiently define it.
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Anonymity is eroding our democracies far faster than our privacy.
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Britain isn't in the EU - so, it won't. I'm responding to a point that was made.

"The point is that laws can be unjust."

That's not exactly profound.
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Yes.

milk (noun):

1. A whitish liquid containing proteins, fats, lactose, and various vitamins and minerals that is produced by the mammary glands of all mature female mammals after they have given birth and serves as nourishment for their young.

2. The milk of cows, goats, or other animals, used as food by humans.

3. Any of various potable liquids resembling milk, such as coconut milk or soymilk.
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I'm not sure what point you are making, but isn't the one I was responding to.
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I'm going to say yes, and no.

Mens rea underpins the British legal system.
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Lazy.

The US believes the right of the individual to harass others based on their immutable characteristics is more important than the right of the individual to be free of harassment based on their immutable characteristics.

The UK doesn't, and that very much reflects UK vs US culture (US culture as we know being racist and divisive).

Meanwhile, the US seems to be flirting with a central idea of communism and fascism - that political criticism of the dear leader is off limits. Thus protecting the right of the (future) authoritarian (dictator) to be free of criticism.

I know which one of two actually reflects an important aspect of freedom of speech.

Rabble rousers will tell you otherwise, but the trick is to recognise they are rabble rousers.
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Anonymity is not privacy.
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
[dead]
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
"much like how the people of the UK already lost control of theirs"

What are you on about, mate?
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Sounds like a company is not adequately defining what the deliverables are.

Task: Walk to the shops & buy some milk.

Deliverables: 1. Video of walking to the shops (including capturing the newspaper for that day at the local shop) 2. Reciept from local store for milk. 3. Physical bottle of Milk.
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
It would be pretty difficult for the IDF to increase their level of collateral damage.
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Making America Gnaw Again
ycombigators
·10 bulan yang lalu·discuss
People say to me, how interesting... and they're right. They right! Nobody knows how interesting more than me.