Back n forth with someone who used "a bit silly" as a justification.
You set a low bar out the gate. I merely met you down there.
Numbers don't make a difference. They can be shaped to any argument like English or German because they're picked by the biases of the author.
You seem to live in a rhetoric derived neural hallucination and are completely detached from physical reality, meaningful thresholds for verification.
Will stick to the skills I picked up studying applied physics and electrical engineering for checking hypothesis and formal verification. No interest continuing a conversation with a functional illiterate who cannot reason outside their native cultural bubble.
To paraphrase Feynman, doesn't make much sense to get hung up on the syntax and their semantics.
Sure and that's the cohort that benefits from the 26% and 50% reproducible science. I grew up around the types that truly need the help in rural America. Saw many people truly benefit.
The other 74% and 50% is nonsense like Myers-Briggs and non-formal language use means someone is a dysregulated nonce; just modern phrenology. Often but not always peddled by rich kids who got a degree and decided everyone who isn't rich like them fits some definition they memorized in the DSM. And they charge money to tell them so; win win.
Frameworks in the DSM are also barely reliable. Inter-rater scores suggest descriptions for anxiety only fit like 23% of the time. I forget the exact number, it's in the low or middle 20s. Descriptions for a diagnosis of depressive disorder are only accurate 30-some percent of the time.
When looked into the primary contributors to DSM are big pharma employees. Zero conflict of interest
No it is not. Appeals to equality of condition have existed for centuries. Among them are that term used verbatim.
Ignored the other points and redirected to the least salient. Will take it as acceptance you realized how silly your carrying water for people who don't know or care you exist is.
Age of account makes it clear you need the social system to remain solvent as you're likely rich on paper. Nothing more.
These companies are built on little more than "a good story" for politicians to sell to voters ..."i voted in Congress for that!"
You're arguing semantics
Economic math is being leveraged against innumerates as euphemism and obfuscation of same old avarice and political corruption. Biology is self selecting. There's no using rhetoric to wave off the ground truth is just a minority of the total population ensuring their own lived experience is put above everyone else's
...such thoughtless justification is not really disproving comparison to "anything goes" discourse of other platforms with a nonsense appeal to empty normalization
100% designed to offload an empty bag onto retail investors
SpaceX is propped up entirely by government subsidy
It has no real sustainable business unlike SK Hynix, very much like OAI and Anthropic
What's silly is propping up ephemeral companies that burn resources and produce nothing
Therapy is just the new religion; used to ostracize and denigrate and demonize people who don't confess their sins to a therapist and receive absolution
It's another "intelligent design" moment; traditional values wrapped in atheist language as religious language has fallen out of favor
Keep in mind therapists are human meat suits with bills and rent to pay.
It's just more capitalism. You're paying for a friendly ear because you have no friends