HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

zwaps

no profile record

comments

zwaps
·7 hari yang lalu·discuss
Is this not just embedding anisotropicicity?

Big topic early 2020s
zwaps
·19 hari yang lalu·discuss
Has anyone compared recently doing something like ModernBERT plus classifier vs. full or lora FT of a small LM like qwen?
zwaps
·20 hari yang lalu·discuss
Oh no that’s terrible. They even say the data is used by the external company to train and use however.

Shit now i have to cancel my account
zwaps
·24 hari yang lalu·discuss
Does not apply to oss models
zwaps
·28 hari yang lalu·discuss
It will not. We are unable.
zwaps
·bulan lalu·discuss
In UK and Spain, computer engineers earn the median income?
zwaps
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
“Sound waves are captured from electro-mechanical vibration in the axles“

Finally! Electronic sound is fine if it is the actual sound of the car instead of some fake recording of a v8
zwaps
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
The author is so close. “decades of debian and it never got any traction. Why?“

Yeah! What a mystery. What could make people install omarchy or pop os over debian, arch or gentoo?

What could possibly be the reason
zwaps
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Omarchy!! shipping a window manager with defaults and or a terminal with a config - what an unspeakable sin.

Linux should be hard and shitty and it should break all the time! What is this newfound obsession with distros that just works and have some great setups and defaults.

Where do we end up if you can just close your laptop lid or copy paste with the same key or or or if even… gasp… the theme is automatically applied across all apps?

DHH? More like literal devil.

No sir! Let me write a blogpost post haste!
zwaps
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Well the business model of Malta is being a tax evasion haven and access port for oligarchs.

That’s quite a difference to most other European countries, although not all.
zwaps
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
The way this argues against its own premise is really ChatGPT like. This happens when you ask it writing about something that isn’t actually true. Which again is funny because as an AI consulting company you should have expertise to know what you want to weite about

But good news, this company also has a free ebook. I am sure it is fantastic.
zwaps
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
This reads like an AI writing to a point an author wants to make without there being evidence.

It is completely incoherent. Apparently we just need markdown and git, but also a knowledge graph and pgvector which accounts for most of the performance.

We don’t need semantic search, because we use… hybrid search (semantic search plus bm25)???

Really bad look for an AI consulting company this.
zwaps
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
The second feature shown in this global launch is ... widgets. Like, Windows Vista widgets. And then, I could also open phone apps but not on my phone but on my computer (because I'd want to do that) and then the remaining feature is file sync.

I am just lost. I wanna watch a documentary on how this kind of thing gets thought out and made and approved by a lot of people and then comes to being annouced as an actual hardware product.
zwaps
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Maybe as a comment, you really put weight on intent classification. I am not sure why. For it to work, you are gonna need my expert domain input. And given that, I feel like the classification bit is basically solved. I wonder a bit why this is the feature you seem to put front and center (e.g. screenshots)
zwaps
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
how so? genuine question
zwaps
·2 bulan yang lalu·discuss
For instance, I have intent classifiers running on my traces and most tools offer some sort of analysis agents or API so it's claude sdk and go.

Maybe let's take Langsmith. Now I know my gripes with that product. How do you see it? What do you add, specifically?
zwaps
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
If only the US would follow its laws or constitution
zwaps
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
I like the idea, just that the examples are reproduced from the training data set.

How does it handle unknown queries?
zwaps
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Yes and no. In principle you are right.

In practice, Claude is trained on its harness and the subscription is priced to best competitors such as Cursor.

This is also why Cursor tries to finetune oss models. Otherwise its performance in the CC flavor of AI coding will just be that bit worse
zwaps
·3 bulan yang lalu·discuss
Nobody is saying your workflow is wrong, it may even be better. However it is not how people use Claude Code or what its attraction is.

What you mention as advantages and features is not something CC users use or require.

On the other hand, Claude is trained on its harness (all but confirmed by Anthropic) so CC is likely just a bit better at its level of abstraction than in cursor. And at the end, you can’t yet best the subscription.