What Linux distro are you using for your servers ?
Just curious to see what the most popular linux os the ycombinator community is using to launch their sites.
46 comments
FreeBSD. (Ok, not a linux distribution, but it's an alternative to using a linux distribution.)
I would like to hear more about why you use it. I used to use FreeBSD for everything, but it's my understanding that the once significant differences in performance and stability between Linux and BSD no longer amount to anything. I switched to Gentoo (can not give up source builds!) two years ago.
It typically has less to do with performance or stability than with ease of use. While Linux is piling on features, BSD focuses on clean design and quality of code and documentation. Linux is "do it now," BSD is "do it right."
I hate to press you on this point -- the wreckage of many a
flame war has barely had time to grow moss -- but can you point
to a specific feature? I assume you mean OS level features --
system calls and such.
I don't understand your question. Do you mean you want an aspect of FreeBSD that's easier to use?
Sure.
Hmm... well, BSD init is easier to use than SysV init. The ports system is also known for its simplicity. The source code is contained in a single CVS tree and the entire OS can be built with a few commands. The man pages and handbook are consistent and well written.
Much of the difference is subjective. FreeBSD feels coherently designed, whereas Linux is a patchwork of programs written by different people with different styles and philosophies.
I don't know a lot about Gentoo (most of my experience is with Debian and Slackware) but from what I understand, its purpose is to be as flexible as possible. That's a legitimate goal, but it seems to conflict with ease of use.
Much of the difference is subjective. FreeBSD feels coherently designed, whereas Linux is a patchwork of programs written by different people with different styles and philosophies.
I don't know a lot about Gentoo (most of my experience is with Debian and Slackware) but from what I understand, its purpose is to be as flexible as possible. That's a legitimate goal, but it seems to conflict with ease of use.
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS 64-bit. It is beyond me why so many people use non-LTS release of Ubuntu on their production servers.
Debian Stable
Amazon EC2 Ubuntu 7.10 gutsy AMI built using code customized by Eric Hammond <[email protected]>
For more information: http://ec2gutsy.notlong.com
Solaris whenever I can, CentOS5 otherwise. Solaris has excellent threading and some apps I run for customers therefore run better on Solaris.
Not linux.. FreeBSD
Debian
RHEL4, though the site's a few years old. Would do RHEL5 if it was today.
Personally, I run Debian. But RedHat really does a good of not breaking stuff at the cost of less frequent updates.
Personally, I run Debian. But RedHat really does a good of not breaking stuff at the cost of less frequent updates.
CentOs 5.0, for the easy Virtualmin GPL install
rPath ( http://www.rpath.com/corp/ ) with custom patches.
I need reliability, with a bias on using source code to produce my running binaries.
Of course, I run NetBSD.
Of course, I run NetBSD.
[deleted]
Slackware
I use FreeBSD (not GNU/Linux), Debian and Ubuntu on my servers.
Gentoo on two, ArchLinux on one
Gentoo, both desktop and server
Debian Etch
Slackware.
CentOS 5.
I use Ubuntu 7.10 64bit.
CentOS 5
Centos
Debian testing
Fedora 8
OpenSuSE
Gentoo