Sysadmin left finger on power button for an hour to avert SAP outage(theregister.co.uk)
theregister.co.uk
Sysadmin left finger on power button for an hour to avert SAP outage
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/03/05/who_me/
85 comments
From "Founders at Work," James Hong recalling how they prevented Hot or Not from being accidentally turned off:
But the Salon.com article was coming out the next morning. I called the writer and asked her if she could push the story back, but she said it was a slow news day and she couldn't. So the article came out and the server got slammed.
My brother needed the server for XMethods, so we did the quickest thing we could think of, which was that night at 3:00 a.m., we took the site down, grabbed an extra PC--a 400 megahertz Celeron, no-memory-in-it machine that I got for free when I opened an eTrade account--and drove to Berkeley where Jim had a shared office.
I remember taking the top off a case for pushpins and mounting it on top of the power switch of the machine so no one could turn it off. Then we put it in the corner under his desk and surrounded it with books, so it just looked like a bunch of stuff under his desk with a little Ethernet cable coming out. And as soon as we turned the site back on, the access logs started flying. It was 5 in the morning!
http://wcarss.org/founders/james_hong_hot_or_not.txt
But the Salon.com article was coming out the next morning. I called the writer and asked her if she could push the story back, but she said it was a slow news day and she couldn't. So the article came out and the server got slammed.
My brother needed the server for XMethods, so we did the quickest thing we could think of, which was that night at 3:00 a.m., we took the site down, grabbed an extra PC--a 400 megahertz Celeron, no-memory-in-it machine that I got for free when I opened an eTrade account--and drove to Berkeley where Jim had a shared office.
I remember taking the top off a case for pushpins and mounting it on top of the power switch of the machine so no one could turn it off. Then we put it in the corner under his desk and surrounded it with books, so it just looked like a bunch of stuff under his desk with a little Ethernet cable coming out. And as soon as we turned the site back on, the access logs started flying. It was 5 in the morning!
http://wcarss.org/founders/james_hong_hot_or_not.txt
I have no idea where my copy of that book is now so thinks for a link to that archive!
During my training, I worked on a BIND4-to-BIND9 migration in an IBM mainframe environment. One week I got bored and started "benchmarking" the server, wrote this little perl script that swamped the server with DNS queries. Then I realized that my feeble little antique of a desktop (Pentium II @400MHz, running NT 4.0, in 2004!) was not even capable to put some serious load on that behemoth, and had not IBM just recently ported Perl 5.8 to z/OS?
So I scp the script over to the mainframe, ssh into it, run it again... and grow disappointed that my puny little perl script is still the bottleneck. How much can this beast take, I wonder. Maybe, if I forked off a couple of children?
In retrospect, I should have let it go at this point. My benchmark was already querying the nameserver at a far higher rate than it would ever encounter in production. I should have written in my report that the performance impact of some configuration changes was negligible if not zero.
But I really wanted to see how many queries this beast could handle. So I kept increasing the number of worker processes hammering BIND with the same queries over and over, until ... my ssh connection dropped. I pinged the mainframe, but I got no response. Ooops.
I was trying to look really busy as the monitoring guy who always looked as if he had just woken up walked down the corridor into our open plan office, grinning, and asked if anyone had something to tell him. Nobody replied. I do not think I have ever been that quiet in my entire life.
"Okay", he said, "the TCP/IP stack on that particular system just crashed, just in case you are wondering.". Oops
"Yeah, but SNA still works", the sysprog replied, "And the LPAR is scheduled for an IPL on Saturday, anyway. It'll do."
Obviously, it was a testing LPAR, so nobody got hurt; they would not let a trainee anywhere near a production system. But let the record show that I did manage to disable VTAM (at least the TCP/IP side of it) with a simple perl script from an unprivileged user account. By accident, but still. Also, I lost about a kilogram in sweat that day.
So I scp the script over to the mainframe, ssh into it, run it again... and grow disappointed that my puny little perl script is still the bottleneck. How much can this beast take, I wonder. Maybe, if I forked off a couple of children?
In retrospect, I should have let it go at this point. My benchmark was already querying the nameserver at a far higher rate than it would ever encounter in production. I should have written in my report that the performance impact of some configuration changes was negligible if not zero.
But I really wanted to see how many queries this beast could handle. So I kept increasing the number of worker processes hammering BIND with the same queries over and over, until ... my ssh connection dropped. I pinged the mainframe, but I got no response. Ooops.
I was trying to look really busy as the monitoring guy who always looked as if he had just woken up walked down the corridor into our open plan office, grinning, and asked if anyone had something to tell him. Nobody replied. I do not think I have ever been that quiet in my entire life.
"Okay", he said, "the TCP/IP stack on that particular system just crashed, just in case you are wondering.". Oops
"Yeah, but SNA still works", the sysprog replied, "And the LPAR is scheduled for an IPL on Saturday, anyway. It'll do."
Obviously, it was a testing LPAR, so nobody got hurt; they would not let a trainee anywhere near a production system. But let the record show that I did manage to disable VTAM (at least the TCP/IP side of it) with a simple perl script from an unprivileged user account. By accident, but still. Also, I lost about a kilogram in sweat that day.
What do these acronyms mean?
SNA LPAR VTAM
SNA LPAR VTAM
LPAR is the ancient, and still somewhat superior[1] version of what we call a VM or docker container today. "Logical partition".
It's funny how much of what seems new isn't, really. Mainframes had VM's figured out decades ago, in a pretty elegant fashion.
IPL is basically "initial boot", SNA was a network transport. VTAM is to SNA the same as Ethernet is to IP (roughly, I'm skipping over LU6.2/APPC/etc).
You didn't ask about CICS, but it's basically cron+middleware but better.
In fact, if you look at, say AWS, and the set of standardized services, it isn't much different from what a mainframe offered so long ago. Standard, if somewhat limited, interfaces for scheduling, load balancing, VMs, databases, "nosql", events, logging/alerting, etc. Even nods to "microservices" and other things that feel new, but aren't really. Self service is a bit new, but the rest is well established.
[1] better I/O isolation, fewer "noisy neighbor" issues for example
It's funny how much of what seems new isn't, really. Mainframes had VM's figured out decades ago, in a pretty elegant fashion.
IPL is basically "initial boot", SNA was a network transport. VTAM is to SNA the same as Ethernet is to IP (roughly, I'm skipping over LU6.2/APPC/etc).
You didn't ask about CICS, but it's basically cron+middleware but better.
In fact, if you look at, say AWS, and the set of standardized services, it isn't much different from what a mainframe offered so long ago. Standard, if somewhat limited, interfaces for scheduling, load balancing, VMs, databases, "nosql", events, logging/alerting, etc. Even nods to "microservices" and other things that feel new, but aren't really. Self service is a bit new, but the rest is well established.
[1] better I/O isolation, fewer "noisy neighbor" issues for example
Some IBM mainframe acronyms
SNA -> Systems Network Architecture
LPAR -> Logical partitions
IPL -> Initial program load
VTAM -> Virtual Telecommunications Access Method
I might be wrong of course
SNA -> Systems Network Architecture
LPAR -> Logical partitions
IPL -> Initial program load
VTAM -> Virtual Telecommunications Access Method
I might be wrong of course
Nah, that is how I remember it. ;-)
I haven't worked with mainframes since, but I found the fact they have their own words for things fascinating. Parallel evolution, so to speak. Like, what mainstream operating systems call a kernel is called a "nucleus" on z/OS, which IMHO is a much cooler name.
I haven't worked with mainframes since, but I found the fact they have their own words for things fascinating. Parallel evolution, so to speak. Like, what mainstream operating systems call a kernel is called a "nucleus" on z/OS, which IMHO is a much cooler name.
LGTM
HA! This is my favorite interview question to ask candidates:
"What is your all time biggest screw up, and how did you come back from it" - I then tell them the story of me loosing several hundred thousand dollars and the funny things that happened around it to set the tone. If you have been in tech for any length of time you have one of these stories (if not a few). I have heard some great ones by simply asking and it gives great insight into a candidate (humor, stress response, the things you have seen).
"What is your all time biggest screw up, and how did you come back from it" - I then tell them the story of me loosing several hundred thousand dollars and the funny things that happened around it to set the tone. If you have been in tech for any length of time you have one of these stories (if not a few). I have heard some great ones by simply asking and it gives great insight into a candidate (humor, stress response, the things you have seen).
i was a college kid at my first "computer job" doing desktop support for a client in downtown Fort Worth in a fairly nice office suite. Remember those old AT power switches? I wired one backwards, turned it on, and it blew all the insulation off the wires in the case and caught on fire. All in a very nice office, fortunately no sprinkles or fire alarm but I was very embarrassed and nearly cost my boss the client.
EDIT: I once got a call from junior developer who had issued an sql statement on an auto-commit database like "update <table> set x=y; where <some condition>; she fat fingered the semicolon and blew up the whole table. She was crying, I felt pretty bad we were able to get the table restored and back online in a few hours. She still tells me how sorry she was to this day ( about 15 years later ).
EDIT: I once got a call from junior developer who had issued an sql statement on an auto-commit database like "update <table> set x=y; where <some condition>; she fat fingered the semicolon and blew up the whole table. She was crying, I felt pretty bad we were able to get the table restored and back online in a few hours. She still tells me how sorry she was to this day ( about 15 years later ).
You can tell from your grammar you pronounce 'sql' in your head as S-Q-L and not sequel.
Wow. I had to read that statement a couple of time to understand exactly what you had inferred. That’s ... really neat.
It flowed just fine for me because I pronounce it S-Q-L in my head as well. I don't know why saying SEQUAL has always felt unnatural to me. Probably because I came across it independently and learned about it by myself instead of having someone else introduce it to me as SEQUAL before seeing the acronym.
And how does that several hundred thousand dollar story go? (if you have time, and care to elaborate, that is) I'm curious.
Me too. I just want to hear the "funny" part of losing that much money. I think the story would be a bit more somber, something along the lines of "...and that's how I ended up blacklisted from the Financial industry, and living in a van down by the river."
You have to apply for a job to find out
I was swapping tables on a live production server,* and accidentally removed all rows on the production table rather than the auxiliary one. With autocommit on. I immediately confessed to my boss, and luckily, there was a backup.
However, I never did what I saw other people do at another job (more than once), which was to run a delete on a live production table intentionally, but unintentionally leave off the "where" clause. And commit without thinking.
I'm not aware of anything I've screwed up that had a dollar figure attached.
*I am not and never have been a sysadmin per se.
However, I never did what I saw other people do at another job (more than once), which was to run a delete on a live production table intentionally, but unintentionally leave off the "where" clause. And commit without thinking.
I'm not aware of anything I've screwed up that had a dollar figure attached.
*I am not and never have been a sysadmin per se.
You didn't remove rows, you had an unscheduled test of your restore procedures.
I've done something similar before, forgot to disable autocommit in DataGrip and ran an UPDATE without a where clause - thankfully we take weekly full backups, nightly incrementals and archive log segments so I shut down the database, performed a point-in-time-restore and the damage was undone.
This was actually a good teaching moment, said database is used as a holding area for incoming data from hospitals before we load it into our billing system so our EDI team has limited write permissions on the database - it's much harder for them to run a "oops, time to grab a backup" query but it was a nice anecdote to use when telling them to run everything in a transaction if they're running anything other than SELECT statements.
I've done something similar before, forgot to disable autocommit in DataGrip and ran an UPDATE without a where clause - thankfully we take weekly full backups, nightly incrementals and archive log segments so I shut down the database, performed a point-in-time-restore and the damage was undone.
This was actually a good teaching moment, said database is used as a holding area for incoming data from hospitals before we load it into our billing system so our EDI team has limited write permissions on the database - it's much harder for them to run a "oops, time to grab a backup" query but it was a nice anecdote to use when telling them to run everything in a transaction if they're running anything other than SELECT statements.
What valuable skill or quality does this show?
I am looking for a few things:
Did you own the mistake. (responsibility)
What steps did you take to resolve it. (accountablity and ownership)
Are you able to laugh about it, or did you learn something from it. I would hope that you can make claim to one or the other. (personality)
Can you tell a story. Because the story is personal, it is topic where you have "mastery" and should demonstrate how you communicate. (communication)
An understanding of your professional background - most of these stories have other "players" in them that help move them along and tell me who you have/had to interact with in the past. (experience)
Remember I give my own example that not only hits these points but probably illicit a laugh our two out of the candidate, and remind them that I am not any different from them. I tend to be able to have more conversational interviews after this question, and get better responses and answers from candidates.
Did you own the mistake. (responsibility)
What steps did you take to resolve it. (accountablity and ownership)
Are you able to laugh about it, or did you learn something from it. I would hope that you can make claim to one or the other. (personality)
Can you tell a story. Because the story is personal, it is topic where you have "mastery" and should demonstrate how you communicate. (communication)
An understanding of your professional background - most of these stories have other "players" in them that help move them along and tell me who you have/had to interact with in the past. (experience)
Remember I give my own example that not only hits these points but probably illicit a laugh our two out of the candidate, and remind them that I am not any different from them. I tend to be able to have more conversational interviews after this question, and get better responses and answers from candidates.
In addition to what others have said about honesty and ownership of mistakes, it shows you how much they're capable of learning from the inevitable mistakes.
Even more importantly, if they haven't made any major mistakes yet, there's a good chance they'll make it once you hire them, because they haven't been through the whole experience and have no scars to show for it. Or maybe they haven't had yet a job where they were responsible for anything that could result in a major incident. There's no lesson in paranoia as great as wiping the wrong storage array, shutting down services in an order other than the sanctioned one, etc.
Even more importantly, if they haven't made any major mistakes yet, there's a good chance they'll make it once you hire them, because they haven't been through the whole experience and have no scars to show for it. Or maybe they haven't had yet a job where they were responsible for anything that could result in a major incident. There's no lesson in paranoia as great as wiping the wrong storage array, shutting down services in an order other than the sanctioned one, etc.
1. How are you at dealing with stress?
2. How are you at dealing with the instinctual desire to hide your mistakes, and instead immediately take steps to remediate them?
Honesty and the ability to own up to your mistakes. It can also show arrogance depending on their response.
I always ask potential coworkers during an interview for a story like that for two reasons: 1) it'll tell me whether or not they have humility, honesty, etc; 2) and, because I love sharing war stories.
One candidate we interviewed answered my question saying that he had never made a mistake like that. Then he went on to tell me a story about how a bad patch from Oracle which he applied brought down production this one time.
The guy seemed arrogant, and I felt like he was lying or he is overstating his skills. Either way, he ended up getting hired by another team (knowing full well that we didn't like him), and he only stayed for about a month or two.
Go figure.
One candidate we interviewed answered my question saying that he had never made a mistake like that. Then he went on to tell me a story about how a bad patch from Oracle which he applied brought down production this one time.
The guy seemed arrogant, and I felt like he was lying or he is overstating his skills. Either way, he ended up getting hired by another team (knowing full well that we didn't like him), and he only stayed for about a month or two.
Go figure.
That’s pretty funny though I don’t think it’d work on a modern setup as everyone I’ve seen for the past 20 or so years does a hard power off after holding down the power button for 5+ seconds.
This was before the introduction of ACPI, which is what makes that possible. Prior to that, switches in PCs operated more like a latching switch than a momentary switch (regardless of whether it was actually a momentary switch or not), so it was the action of releasing the button that would either send the signal to shutdown, or physically break the circuit supplying power to the computer.
This is where the old "It is now safe to shut down your computer." screens of Windows 9x/NT 3 came from. http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/286/950/e05...
This is where the old "It is now safe to shut down your computer." screens of Windows 9x/NT 3 came from. http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/286/950/e05...
Are services still running when that screen is being displayed? I'd have thought that by the time it shows up, all processes are terminated.
It's in the article. The guy pressed the power button on the wrong machine, other than the one that was shut down.
Holding for 5 secs is an ACPI function, ACPI was first released in 1996, so having systems without it around in 1999 wouldn't be surprising.
I've learned coding on such machines, they're quite fun. Easily recognized by the computer requiring a manual powerdown after the OS has shutdown (Win95 showed a message ala "You can powerdown the machine now")
I've learned coding on such machines, they're quite fun. Easily recognized by the computer requiring a manual powerdown after the OS has shutdown (Win95 showed a message ala "You can powerdown the machine now")
Before ATX and ACPI standards a typical power button was just a switch in power supply's AC circuit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYdnPTX0FD8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYdnPTX0FD8
A model of PS/2 I worked on when I was a teenager had mains voltage across two exposed terminals behind the big power switch. I discovered this when dropping a screwdriver across them.
Had a power supply open to replace the fan, turned it on while open to test if it was wired up correctly. I flicked the switch with my thumb, with two fingers inside the case to stabilise it as the fan was loose. Those fingers briefly touched across the back of the switch and I got 240v mains straight to my hand. Luckily it caused my whole arm to contract so my hand couldn't seize up around the terminals!
[deleted]
Makes me realize how much I take quality of life features in modern servers for granted. We don't need to be physically present to reboot servers, eliminating the possibility (well, mostly) we will power down the wrong one like this - even if the OS is completely unresponsive there's lights out management that can be used to remotely manage power to the system. For the times that one needs to do physical maintenance on a server a blinking light can be toggled through the LOM interface to identify the machine, you can have the hostname display on a little LCD on the front panel too.
It's really amazing to see how far computing has come in just the past two decades.
It's really amazing to see how far computing has come in just the past two decades.
I type "reboot" into the wrong SSH window all time, especially when I'm tired.
It's really quite a lot easier than pressing the wrong power button (I do that too at my desk).
It's really quite a lot easier than pressing the wrong power button (I do that too at my desk).
I've done it myself, I generally avoid it by using `shutdown -r` instead which will by default delay reboot for 1 minute (at least it does on CentOS/RHEL 7). It's annoying to wait the extra time, but having a period to backout with a `shutdown -c` in case I made a mistake has saved me more than it hasn't.
On the flip side, at least when you make this mistake with a VM you're typically not down for long assuming you have fast-ish storage - on average any of the VM's I'm responsible for are back up in 60-90 seconds, physical machines can take 5 minutes or more (memory testing, expansion ROM's, etc. all make post take FOREVER even on modern hardware).
On the flip side, at least when you make this mistake with a VM you're typically not down for long assuming you have fast-ish storage - on average any of the VM's I'm responsible for are back up in 60-90 seconds, physical machines can take 5 minutes or more (memory testing, expansion ROM's, etc. all make post take FOREVER even on modern hardware).
If it helps, molly-guard [0] aims to prevent this kind of "oops". Back in the days of running co-located kit, we had that on the host boxes for the "oops, that was the host rather than a VM that I just stopped" moments.
[0] https://packages.debian.org/sid/molly-guard
[0] https://packages.debian.org/sid/molly-guard
This is an old-style directly connected power switch. If you release and re-press it quickly enough the power won't go out as there's still enough residual energy in the PSU capacitors. I used to do this all the time on my 486 as a sort of absent-minded tick.
I don't blame the guy for not trying that with a production SAP server though...
I don't blame the guy for not trying that with a production SAP server though...
15 years ago when we were hosting servers in a co located facility I accidentally turned off a server instead of rebooting it (from terminal services).
The support personel were annoyed as they had to drive over to the facility and manually push the power button
The support personel were annoyed as they had to drive over to the facility and manually push the power button
I still have the habit to type "-r 0" ctrl+a "shutdown".
Oh wow that's really smart. Thanks!
Doesn't hurt to do the same when writing UPDATE queries, `WHERE id=X LIMIT 1` ctrl+a `UPDATE...`
I got used to typing "UPDATE SET x=x WHERE ..." and then going back and changing the "x=x" to the actual column assignments after I typed the WHERE clause.
to this day, i type "update where <where clause>" and then go back and add the set part of the statement. I think it would have been safer to put the where clause at the front of the sql syntax. Like "delete where <whereclause> from table", "update where <where clause> set ..." etc. I know any production database that's of real importance is going to have safeguards in place but it still makes me nervous.
Yeah, I wish they would update the SQL syntax to at least allow the WHERE clauses to be first in UPDATEs and DELETEs. Doesn't seem to be much enthusiasm around for making big changes to SQL like that though.
[deleted]
I have used ngrok to make my laptop work as a production server when I was user testing https://github.com/zitterbewegung/mms2text . I setup twilio to point to the url provided by ngrok. I just left my laptop home and I got people to test the app. Eventually I set it up on AWS but it chugged away fine on my laptop (Macbook Pro TB 13 inch).
Speed 3: Uptime
I did the same almost two decades ago. Old AT power supplies on Proliant servers would turn the server off only after you lifted your finger. I have pressed it on a wrong server. Had to reach with my foot to the phone lying close by on the floor to call accounting department to log off the application to prevent corruption when the Novell Netware server powering it was was rebooted.
386s had a push button power switch where if you were really fast you could let it out and immediately push it back in and the power wouldn't be interrupted. Found this out in class - we would walk over to each other, lean over pretending to talk to a friend and sneakily push the power button in. Before we worked out that trick, you would have to get your finger on the button before the other guy took his off, then hold it down while you saved your work.
> 386s had a push button power switch where if you were really fast you could let it out and immediately push it back in and the power wouldn't be interrupted
It would be more accurate to say “some computers in the late 1980s and 1990s”; not all of them were 386s, and not all 386s had this style of switch.
It would be more accurate to say “some computers in the late 1980s and 1990s”; not all of them were 386s, and not all 386s had this style of switch.
It would be even more accurate to say "Many power supplies, especially when computers were much less power hungry, had enough capacitance to be able to survive 0.1 to 0.2s needed for the operator to reset the switch back on. This only works when the switch is switching AC and the motherboard stays connected to PSU. Since ATX standard was introduced the switch actually disconnects the motherboard from the power supply and it is no longer possible. Many power supplies still have independent AC switch but this is not typically operated by the user to switch the machine on or off."
I RDP'd to a Windows server an hour's drive from my office at a public library in another town. I had right-clicked on the network connection to check out some settings....and accidentally clicked DISABLE instead of PROPERTIES (or whatever it was called in Windows 2000 server) and disabled the network connection. It was a long drive...with my phone ringing the entire time. Never made that mistake again.
There is a rather similar (maybe same but changed to protect the not-so-innocent?) story on the daily wtf; http://thedailywtf.com/articles/Trauma-Center
A modern interpretation of Hans Brinker.
[deleted]
What about disabling the power button effect in the OS?
This is probably such an old system that it has a power button that is not connected to the motherboard but is directly between the mains power and the PSU. In that case releasing the button would mean that the server is just depowered just like you hold the button for a few seconds on a modern system.
This is also why those computers said "It's now safe to disable the power" after shutting down.
This is also why those computers said "It's now safe to disable the power" after shutting down.
Nowadays holding it for 5+ seconds still turns the system off, I wonder if this is a BIOS or a hardware configuration. Probably it's the PSU's logic, to power off if the 2 pins are shorted for more than 5 seconds.
On old AT systems (the ones where Windows 9x would show "It is now safe to turn off your computer"), one could actually press and hold the power button and the system would stay running. And when you're bored you can also quickly move your finger off the button and jab it down again (this would flip the switch back to on), and if you're quick enough, the system would not see that there was a power interruption.
Indeed the old AT power button was a mains (120V) switch, with thick cables going from and to the power supply unit.
On old AT systems (the ones where Windows 9x would show "It is now safe to turn off your computer"), one could actually press and hold the power button and the system would stay running. And when you're bored you can also quickly move your finger off the button and jab it down again (this would flip the switch back to on), and if you're quick enough, the system would not see that there was a power interruption.
Indeed the old AT power button was a mains (120V) switch, with thick cables going from and to the power supply unit.
>Nowadays holding it for 5+ seconds still turns the system off, I wonder if this is a BIOS or a hardware configuration. Probably it's the PSU's logic, to power off if the 2 pins are shorted for more than 5 seconds.
It is BIOS+Hardware (the PSU is not involved). As a matter of fact to "switch on" a ATX power supply (not connected to a motheboard) you normally use a paperclip (or a short piece of cable) to connect the green with any of the black see:
https://forum.overclock3d.net/showthread.php?t=394
The whole point is that (unless the PSU has a mains switch and it is turned off) an ATX power supply is always partially ON, powering (parts of) the motherboard at all times (this allows for such things as Wake on Lan or switch on via CTRL+F11 or dedicated key on the keyboard).
It is BIOS+Hardware (the PSU is not involved). As a matter of fact to "switch on" a ATX power supply (not connected to a motheboard) you normally use a paperclip (or a short piece of cable) to connect the green with any of the black see:
https://forum.overclock3d.net/showthread.php?t=394
The whole point is that (unless the PSU has a mains switch and it is turned off) an ATX power supply is always partially ON, powering (parts of) the motherboard at all times (this allows for such things as Wake on Lan or switch on via CTRL+F11 or dedicated key on the keyboard).
Without ACPI (which NT4 was) the ATX power button was handled entirely by the BIOS (I think in SMI code). With ACPI the power button (when you don't hold it for 5 seconds of course) was handled by the OS.
This was before the power button function was fulfilled by the OS.
Rather, closing the button circuit (ie, pressing and then releasing) will directly shut off power on the motherboard, the OS cannot prevent this.
Rather, closing the button circuit (ie, pressing and then releasing) will directly shut off power on the motherboard, the OS cannot prevent this.
ACPI wasn't guaranteed to be supported back then, as it was a newish thing at the time this happened.
[deleted]
[deleted]
wyclif(1)
Unscrew a bolt from the server rack and tape it on the button, done
Straight from the article:
"Jeremy told Who, me? that his mate asked to be relieved, as he was in a bit of pain. Those requests were denied due to the risk of the power going off and also out of a desire to make the poor chap suffer for his error."
"Jeremy told Who, me? that his mate asked to be relieved, as he was in a bit of pain. Those requests were denied due to the risk of the power going off and also out of a desire to make the poor chap suffer for his error."
Last time Indiana Jones tried that, the whole cave collapsed and guys were waiting with blow guns. Have you learned nothing?! :)
ETA: And he almost lost his hat! Come on man!
ETA: And he almost lost his hat! Come on man!
>Jeremy told Who, me? that his mate asked to be relieved, as he was in a bit of pain. Those requests were denied due to the risk of the power going off and also out of a desire to make the poor chap suffer for his error.
Looks like they wanted him to suffer :p
Looks like they wanted him to suffer :p
You call it suffer, others call it corrective training ;)
Corrective training for the wrong person. Every time I hear a case like this, I'm reminded that when something like this goes wrong, it's usually the fault of something that failed prior to getting to this stage. The problem isn't that this person pressed the wrong button. The problem is that the wrong button was allowed to be pushed in the first place.
Normally I'm down with that, but I think there are some ground-state base cases where you have for perfectly sound reasons penetrated all the security and safety affordances and simply must be careful. "Make sure you've got the right power button before pushing it" is probably one of them. There's not much you can do about that. Maybe not zero, but not much, in a context like this where many servers are being updated, because, again, whatever protections you may have had in place have already been bypassed.
Similarly, when push comes to shove you'll never be able to eliminate the needs for somebody to jump to root on some server, at which point, well, be careful is all you've really got. Hopefully you've built some good habits into your fingers.
Similarly, when push comes to shove you'll never be able to eliminate the needs for somebody to jump to root on some server, at which point, well, be careful is all you've really got. Hopefully you've built some good habits into your fingers.
Would you risk it after the button is already pressed?
You'd have to take the bolt into the button without releasing it...
You'd have to take the bolt into the button without releasing it...
I suppose the point is, relying on a human to keep a button pressed without fatigue for an hour is also risking it.
and what if the tape comes loose?
> Jeremy told Who, me? that his mate asked to be relieved, as he was in a bit of pain. Those requests were denied due to the risk of the power going off and also out of a desire to make the poor chap suffer for his error.
I think that's just awful.
I think that's just awful.
Likely also simple embellishment
The Symmetrix had an EPO (Emergency Power Off) which was a red button mounted in a recessed area on the back of the cabinet, and was protected by a plastic lid. To perform an EPO, you had to lift the lid and hold the button down for 30 seconds or so.
One of our DC ops employees was moving a heavy server into a cage and accidentally bumped the corner of the server into the plastic lid. The plastic lid was forced inward and got jammed depressing the EPO button. Moments later the entire Symmetrix powered off.
Later that day, as the word got around, another DC ops employee in a different datacenter looked at the Symmetrix and curiosity got the better of him. He didn't see how it was possible for the plastic lid to get jammed. So he punched the lid with his hand. Moments later that Symmetrix went down too. :-(
We reported this design issue to EMC. A while later, a few of us were on a factory tour at EMC. They pointed out to us the "Loudcloud Stopper" work-around. It was a rubber stopper mounted next to the EPO button that prevented the plastic lid from being pressed inward.