[untitled]

8 comments

Zenst7 anni fa

So pre-industrial period and a drop in human population correlates with a reduction in global temperature.

Population has increased a lot and would be interesting to map that upon global temperature.

However you look at things - humans DO affect the climate of this planet pure and simple.

mistrial97 anni fa

it is irresponsible to promote this rhetoric

theafh7 anni fa

Actually this is due to the slightly "clickbaity" tile... If you had read the article you would easily find it is about:

1.) one of the many scientific studies showing the huge effects humans have on climate 2.) reforestation is an effective solution to reduce the human effects on climate

Zenst7 anni fa

How is this rhetoric?

smallbigfish7 anni fa

It was always obvious that this is one of the solutions to the climate change.

siiiii7 anni fa

There's your solution to climate change. /s

petjuh7 anni fa

I wonder if Republicans would be more willing to believe in climate change if it's solved through endless wars instead of taxes.

Perpetual war to keep the planet cool.

arghblarg7 anni fa

At this point it should be considered unethical to have more than 1 child per household. I don't care if that's politically incorrect, it's basic math. The entire species needs to drop to below-replacement reproduction. No eugenics, genocide or war required, just stop acting like horndogs or get snipped for Pete's sake.