The truth about lab-grown meat [video](bbc.com)
bbc.com
The truth about lab-grown meat [video]
https://www.bbc.com/reel/video/p09s518l/the-truth-about-lab-grown-meat
54 comments
The cells in chicken feathers are live?
> it tastes just like a real thing
Well, given that chicken is mostly tasteless, and nuggets are highly flavoured to make them appealing, that's not surprising at all. Might have been made out of cardboard if you can mix it with the right things to get the consistency close.
Well, given that chicken is mostly tasteless, and nuggets are highly flavoured to make them appealing, that's not surprising at all. Might have been made out of cardboard if you can mix it with the right things to get the consistency close.
This already happened. The Federal Police uncovered that Brazilian company JBS, the largest meat processing company in the world[0], was selling rotten beef and minced meat mixed with minced cardboard[1][2]. People didn't noticed until news came in.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JBS_S.A.
[1]: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-39311336
[2]: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/17/world/americas/brazil-foo...
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JBS_S.A.
[1]: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-39311336
[2]: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/17/world/americas/brazil-foo...
> given that chicken is mostly tasteless
This is a huge misunderstanding. Chickens only are tasteless if you are eating tasteless chickens.
Despite cooking it the same way, the Kampong chicken in Malaysia tastes very different from the chicken served in an osteria chilometro zero in rural Italy, which once again is distinct from the HuNan mountain chickens found in rural China.
And don't get me started on chicken in the Kyoto countryside, which was one of the most surprising things in my trip to Japan. Never knew chicken can taste like that.
This is a huge misunderstanding. Chickens only are tasteless if you are eating tasteless chickens.
Despite cooking it the same way, the Kampong chicken in Malaysia tastes very different from the chicken served in an osteria chilometro zero in rural Italy, which once again is distinct from the HuNan mountain chickens found in rural China.
And don't get me started on chicken in the Kyoto countryside, which was one of the most surprising things in my trip to Japan. Never knew chicken can taste like that.
Exactly. A while back I started getting all (well, most) of my meat from a local farm. This farm does the whole happy animals raised right thing.
Flavor-wise, there are 2 things that keep me coming back for more. 1) The chicken doesn't just have flavor, it tastes good. 2) The fat in the pork is freaking delicious.
Flavor-wise, there are 2 things that keep me coming back for more. 1) The chicken doesn't just have flavor, it tastes good. 2) The fat in the pork is freaking delicious.
Oh that's fair enough. In Brazil you can get "galinha caipira" which is a kinda free-range but turned up to 11. The meat is brown in colour, very dense and quite chewy, and if properly prepared salt is enough for it to taste great!
That's not usually what people mean when they say "tastes like chicked" though.
That's not usually what people mean when they say "tastes like chicked" though.
Even if it's true that you could make non-chicken things taste like chicken, the important bit is that in this case they made lab-grown chicken meat taste like chicken. That is an important distinction. I also question whether making things taste like chicken is quite as easy as you describe. If it is, then all the folks making vegetarian chicken substitutes that don't taste very much like chicken have some explaining to do.
> they made lab-grown chicken meat taste like chicken
That's not what the video demonstrates. The video demonstrates that they made chicken nuggets made from lab grown meat taste like real chicken nuggets.
> all the folks making vegetarian chicken substitutes that don't taste very much like chicken
Are there really no vegetarian substitutes for nuggets that taste the same?
That's not what the video demonstrates. The video demonstrates that they made chicken nuggets made from lab grown meat taste like real chicken nuggets.
> all the folks making vegetarian chicken substitutes that don't taste very much like chicken
Are there really no vegetarian substitutes for nuggets that taste the same?
I can't prove nonexistence, but the ones I've had are not very close. Beyond apparently tried in the early '10s but the product was not well reviewed. They just released a new type of tender that is apparently much better. Nonetheless, the fact that even companies that are dedicated to making high fidelity plant-based meat replicas have failed before suggests this is not an easy problem.
Are you sure the problem was taste, as opposed to other characteristics, like consistency, chewiness, how moist it is, etc?
There are confounding factors. This thread is about taste / flavour alone.
There are confounding factors. This thread is about taste / flavour alone.
This thread is not just about taste. That was the word used in one of the comments, but in the video in question, the reporter said she "wouldn't know the difference." The operative question here is the development of a workable substitute for chicken meat, not the ability to isolate its flavor. My only contention is that this is not trivial, the way the first respondent claimed it was.
> This thread is not just about taste.
Wrong. The thread that started with my comment was specifically responding to "it tastes just like a real thing".
> That was the word used in one of the comments, but in the video in question, the reporter said she "wouldn't know the difference."
Fair point. I didn't watch the video (unfortunately I can't at the moment), so I was responding specifically to the parent comment. That's on me.
Wrong. The thread that started with my comment was specifically responding to "it tastes just like a real thing".
> That was the word used in one of the comments, but in the video in question, the reporter said she "wouldn't know the difference."
Fair point. I didn't watch the video (unfortunately I can't at the moment), so I was responding specifically to the parent comment. That's on me.
Considering that the principle ingredient in chicken nuggets is chicken, no there are none and there never will be.
The fake adversity and theatrics make the video feel really dishonest.
TL;DW: It's grown from cells off a chicken feather, using "the same nutrition", is still too expensive, looks like ground chicken, and is indistunguishable when turned into a breaded/fried chicken nugget.
TL;DW: It's grown from cells off a chicken feather, using "the same nutrition", is still too expensive, looks like ground chicken, and is indistunguishable when turned into a breaded/fried chicken nugget.
Im a vegan but Ive noticed that most other vegans are not really looking forward to lab grown meat. I on the other hand am optimistic and hopeful. I still miss the taste, texture and nutritional benefits of meat and this will hopefully tick those boxes (with plenty of other bonuses as well). The biggest challenge it seems to me though, is once price parity is achieved, how do you convince meat eaters to choose this chicken nugget over the perceived 'healthier' flesh of a dead chicken. That to me, will be the watershed moment. Perhaps its just a case of removing subsidies on real meat or getting the price point of cultured meat to be even less than real meat so people dont have to make the decision in the first place - their wallets will make it for them
I'm hoping that we go beyond taste and nutritional parity.
Instead of matching flavor, in theory we can make it even better. For steak, that may be fattier. For chicken, it could be way more flavorful.
And in terms or health. It could be the healthiest meat you could eat, not only for the environment but for the consumer. Either higher protein or more essential nutrients. No reason to just try and mimic once they have achieved a matching taste/cost.
Instead of matching flavor, in theory we can make it even better. For steak, that may be fattier. For chicken, it could be way more flavorful.
And in terms or health. It could be the healthiest meat you could eat, not only for the environment but for the consumer. Either higher protein or more essential nutrients. No reason to just try and mimic once they have achieved a matching taste/cost.
>> Either higher protein or more essential nutrients.
So it turns out that Glycine is an important amino acid. It's primarily (but not only) used to build connective tissues. Turns out a great source of it is eating connective tissue, so get bone-in wings and eat those things clean. This is just one thing you probably won't get from lab-grown meat. OTOH most people avoid eating the icky parts anyway.
So it turns out that Glycine is an important amino acid. It's primarily (but not only) used to build connective tissues. Turns out a great source of it is eating connective tissue, so get bone-in wings and eat those things clean. This is just one thing you probably won't get from lab-grown meat. OTOH most people avoid eating the icky parts anyway.
> Perhaps its just a case of removing subsidies on real meat
Or simply deciding as a society that the horrific torture the modern meat industry engages in is unconscionable. As with cars, once you remove the "necessity"[1] of a consumer choice, the argument for subsidizing it or compromising other values to expand availability disappears. People who prefer real meat over hypothetically indistinguishable lab-grown meat can pay full-price for the environmental and ethical costs; this seems like it'll be more than enough to shift the market.
[1] This is taking for granted the position that abstaining from meat is unviable. I don't see this view changing much.
Or simply deciding as a society that the horrific torture the modern meat industry engages in is unconscionable. As with cars, once you remove the "necessity"[1] of a consumer choice, the argument for subsidizing it or compromising other values to expand availability disappears. People who prefer real meat over hypothetically indistinguishable lab-grown meat can pay full-price for the environmental and ethical costs; this seems like it'll be more than enough to shift the market.
[1] This is taking for granted the position that abstaining from meat is unviable. I don't see this view changing much.
> how do you convince meat eaters to choose this chicken nugget over the perceived 'healthier' flesh of a dead chicken.
Meat eaters aren't as picky eaters as vegans, putting meat in front of them is all the convincing they need. I eat McNuggets fully knowing they are just ground up baby chicks, beak and all, I don't care I eat animals because they taste good. I would happily eat dog if it tasted like chicken, Ill happily eat meat from a lab I don't care about my food being "organic".
Meat eaters aren't as picky eaters as vegans, putting meat in front of them is all the convincing they need. I eat McNuggets fully knowing they are just ground up baby chicks, beak and all, I don't care I eat animals because they taste good. I would happily eat dog if it tasted like chicken, Ill happily eat meat from a lab I don't care about my food being "organic".
The real question for me is whether this "meat" will result in less carbon emission, which seems highly unlikely. Legumes will probably remain the cheapest and most ethical source for proteins for a long time and there are lentil and bean dishes that are a lot tastier than most of the ways people eat chicken (in my opinion as someone who still eats chicken)
> The biggest challenge it seems to me though, is once price parity is achieved, how do you convince meat eaters to choose this chicken nugget over the perceived 'healthier' flesh of a dead chicken.
By pushing beyond price parity. If it tastes the same, actually has the same composition, and costs less, people will buy it, and economies of scale will make real meat a lot less attractive very quickly.
People will also stop having an (easy) choice because McDonalds will almost certainly jump on the wagon train and advertise that their chicken nuggets are now "cruelty free" or whatever marketing term they use to mask the fact that they did it because it's cheaper.
What I'm not going to do, as a meat-eater, is pay 5x as much for the privilege of eating a shittier burger, that will also kill me unless I take vitamin supplements on top.
By pushing beyond price parity. If it tastes the same, actually has the same composition, and costs less, people will buy it, and economies of scale will make real meat a lot less attractive very quickly.
People will also stop having an (easy) choice because McDonalds will almost certainly jump on the wagon train and advertise that their chicken nuggets are now "cruelty free" or whatever marketing term they use to mask the fact that they did it because it's cheaper.
What I'm not going to do, as a meat-eater, is pay 5x as much for the privilege of eating a shittier burger, that will also kill me unless I take vitamin supplements on top.
I'm vegan, and I'm on board with lab-grown meat. Or at least, I don't have any ethical issues with it, provided the energy costs are not insane.
That said...after six years of being vegan and maybe another six (I think?) as vegetarian before that, at this point I've found plenty of other dishes that don't involve meat. I really don't crave meat, and I really don't feel like it's missing in the dishes I make. So while I'm on board with lab-grown meat, and will try it when it's available, I'm really not the target market. I agree with you that the big question is how appealing it will be to meat-eaters. But I presume they've done their market research on that.
That said...after six years of being vegan and maybe another six (I think?) as vegetarian before that, at this point I've found plenty of other dishes that don't involve meat. I really don't crave meat, and I really don't feel like it's missing in the dishes I make. So while I'm on board with lab-grown meat, and will try it when it's available, I'm really not the target market. I agree with you that the big question is how appealing it will be to meat-eaters. But I presume they've done their market research on that.
> I still miss the taste, texture and nutritional benefits of meat and this will hopefully tick those boxes
To vegans I have to say "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."
You can have all those things with actual chicken, you just have to spend more or eat it less frequently to mitigate the harmful effects of factory farming. Really, adding yourselves to that customer base may well result in a net improvement in animal welfare and food safety.
And don't forget that the more accurate you want the taste and texture, the more of the actual chicken you have to grow in the dish, and at that point, is there really a big ethical benefit?
To vegans I have to say "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."
You can have all those things with actual chicken, you just have to spend more or eat it less frequently to mitigate the harmful effects of factory farming. Really, adding yourselves to that customer base may well result in a net improvement in animal welfare and food safety.
And don't forget that the more accurate you want the taste and texture, the more of the actual chicken you have to grow in the dish, and at that point, is there really a big ethical benefit?
Once price parity is remotely close, I believe a lot of people (myself included) will recognize all the auxiliary benefits and opt for cultured meat. Once price parity is achieved and succeeded, there'll be no looking back.
most other vegans are not really looking forward to lab grown meat
I've had the same experience. Not vegan myself, but eat mostly vegetarian for health reasons (continue to eat fish and dairy, and a burger every blue moon).
Vegetarian/vegan cooking (whether or not you add dairy and eggs to the mix) can be quite tasty, hearty, and fulfilling on it's own.
I personally hope the "lab meat" stuff is just a stop-gap to get western eaters used to a reduced- or no-meat diet. But, if lab meat ends up economical and environmentally friendly, I'll be happy.
I've had the same experience. Not vegan myself, but eat mostly vegetarian for health reasons (continue to eat fish and dairy, and a burger every blue moon).
Vegetarian/vegan cooking (whether or not you add dairy and eggs to the mix) can be quite tasty, hearty, and fulfilling on it's own.
I personally hope the "lab meat" stuff is just a stop-gap to get western eaters used to a reduced- or no-meat diet. But, if lab meat ends up economical and environmentally friendly, I'll be happy.
>Im a vegan but Ive noticed that most other vegans are not really looking forward to lab grown meat.
I would hope that most vegans would be looking forward to a massive reduction in animal cruelty. I despise factory farming, but I thrive best on a high protein diet. The vast majority of vegan protein sources come with too much carb, fat or both. There is simply no vegan alternative that compares with lean meat.
I would hope that most vegans would be looking forward to a massive reduction in animal cruelty. I despise factory farming, but I thrive best on a high protein diet. The vast majority of vegan protein sources come with too much carb, fat or both. There is simply no vegan alternative that compares with lean meat.
I'm omnivorous, but I'm investing in this kind of companies. From my perspective this is a future with less suffering and more sustainability. Those things are important drivers of my mental health, and also eating less antibiotics sounds like a good idea.
I think it's telling that not even vegans want it.
You wouldn't get sex advice from a nun, so why eat laboratory meat from a vegan?
You wouldn't get sex advice from a nun, so why eat laboratory meat from a vegan?
Why would current-day vegans want it? Most of the vegans I know gag at the idea of eating meat.
The real target market is current-day meat-eaters who wish, for ethical or environmental reasons, that they ate less meat.
Or my position: that the industrial-scale torture of factory farms is a stain on humanity, but most people's consciences are too stunted to even engage with moral questions if it means changing their own behavior. In the presence of indistinguishable lab-grown meat, this argument against more ethical practices evaporates.
The real target market is current-day meat-eaters who wish, for ethical or environmental reasons, that they ate less meat.
Or my position: that the industrial-scale torture of factory farms is a stain on humanity, but most people's consciences are too stunted to even engage with moral questions if it means changing their own behavior. In the presence of indistinguishable lab-grown meat, this argument against more ethical practices evaporates.
Why would regular people want it? We already have real meat. Those who don't want it can stick to plants. It's risky to eat laboratory things without knowing the centuries long impact on people.
> industrial-scale torture of factory farms
So melodramatic. You can raise your own animals.
> but most people's consciences are too stunted
No, some people are so weak minded that they attribute human characteristics to animals to the point of wincing at the idea of a balanced omnivorous diet.
You only find this permanent state of infantilization in first world countries. Even Buddhists in Tibet are perfectly happy to eat meat.
> industrial-scale torture of factory farms
So melodramatic. You can raise your own animals.
> but most people's consciences are too stunted
No, some people are so weak minded that they attribute human characteristics to animals to the point of wincing at the idea of a balanced omnivorous diet.
You only find this permanent state of infantilization in first world countries. Even Buddhists in Tibet are perfectly happy to eat meat.
I can submit a patch to an open-source project and everybody benefits ; but if I raise my own animals, the industrial-scale torture continues anyway. How many people need to raise their own animals before the abuse ends? It's not "weak-minded" or even melodramatic to conclude that an animal suffers when it is beaten.
> Even Buddhists in Tibet are perfectly happy to eat meat.
It is generally true that some adherents of religion X regularly do non-X things, in Tibet and elsewhere.
> Even Buddhists in Tibet are perfectly happy to eat meat.
It is generally true that some adherents of religion X regularly do non-X things, in Tibet and elsewhere.
If the carbon footprint is less, I can see a lot of Millenials and Gen-Z-ers wanting to. We are, I believe, "regular people" as much as you are.
long as its truly indistinguishable price will win out. don't worry about it too much.
if this was available in a store today I would prefer it over most offerings. Likely anti-biotic free, no added hormones, vastly reduced risk of contamination. It reduces the threat of swine flu and bird flu. Vastly better for the environment. No idea why anyone would have an issue with it besides the initial mental gymnastics of accepting where it comes from.
If most people saw how their meat was processed then I think they’d be converted to lab grown meat (or turned vegan).
How is raw meat processed?
Don't want to speak for OP but they could be talking about the way animals are actually killed for meat. It's pretty barbaric. I eat a lot of meat and do some mental partitioning to just not think about it. Would be all about having a real alternative that provides all of the the nutrition with none of the death and torture.
Note: Personally I don't see veganism as an alternative for myself but I fully support those that choose it.
Note: Personally I don't see veganism as an alternative for myself but I fully support those that choose it.
There are a lot of studies that need to be done to show it has the same nutritional value as real meat.
The food industry has managed to completely obliterate the nutritional value of bread so I'm not going to just trust some lab grown meat will be fine.
The food industry has managed to completely obliterate the nutritional value of bread so I'm not going to just trust some lab grown meat will be fine.
> No idea why anyone would have an issue with it besides the initial mental gymnastics of accepting where it comes from.
People are fine with the way things are. If it's not broken don't fix it.
People are fine with the way things are. If it's not broken don't fix it.
To be fair though, it is very broken.
we get new virus strains every year due to mass poultry and pork farming. Mad cow was not super fun. Mass meat farms are a large driver in climate change. Not to mention the ethical issues in killing millions of animals a year if there is an alternative not too.
The alternative not too also means millions of those animals just won't exist. There will be no reason to have most of the farm animals we have.
sure, but they were going to be killed anyway. We just wont force / allow them to have kids and the problem will be resolved. Its a one time kill of animals that were going to be killed anyway. Cycle stops there.
What cycle? You have a subjective opinion that it's better not to exist at all than to exist and be killed (which happens to everything on this planet).
There are plenty of farm animals that live good lives.
People need to drop this weird utopian idea that we can live in this world without death.
I won't be touching lab grown meat until they can prove it has the same nutritional value as meat from an actual animal. I have my doubts since it won't be actual absorbing anything from the food it eats out of the ground like a real animal. I have absolutely zero problem with animal death if they're not treated inhumanely during their lives. Nature provides a far worse death for many of them than what they get being raised on a farm.
There are plenty of farm animals that live good lives.
People need to drop this weird utopian idea that we can live in this world without death.
I won't be touching lab grown meat until they can prove it has the same nutritional value as meat from an actual animal. I have my doubts since it won't be actual absorbing anything from the food it eats out of the ground like a real animal. I have absolutely zero problem with animal death if they're not treated inhumanely during their lives. Nature provides a far worse death for many of them than what they get being raised on a farm.
Is there any information about the economic viability of lab grown meat? I can't imagine it's cheap to supply whatever nutrients they're using.
Resource usage: https://agronomics.im/benefits-of-clean-meat/
> Likely anti-biotic free
I wonder how they solved that problem, because traditionally lab grown meat has had to be full of antibiotics, since there is no immune system.
I wonder how they solved that problem, because traditionally lab grown meat has had to be full of antibiotics, since there is no immune system.
They grow in a sterile environment
I'm sure all lab meat experiments have been done in a sterile environment, anything else would just be silly. But no sterile environment remains sterile for very long, hence the use of antibiotics. What I'm wondering is what other technique there is to maintain the sterile environment they've come up with that doesn't kill the desired tissue.
You know, solving the classic Trumpian lung disinfection problem.
You know, solving the classic Trumpian lung disinfection problem.
The truth about lab-grown meat is hidden behind a dozen third party scripts and is in a video format. Guess I'll never find out.
I am vegan and very excited about this topic, however in the interest of setting expectations I'd like to say that the truth they reveal in the video is: lab grown meat is a thing.
I want to know how it can be nutritional at all since meat from actual animals gets a lot of its value from the fact that the animal actually eats stuff from the ground.
Can we have a [video] tag on this please?
Thanks, you're right, I'll add a tag next time
At the end of the video, the reporter is trying a deep-fried chicken nugget out of it and saying that it tastes just like a real thing.