Stanford Professor Garry Nolan Is Analyzing Anomalous Materials from UFO Crashes(vice.com)
vice.com
Stanford Professor Garry Nolan Is Analyzing Anomalous Materials from UFO Crashes
https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7nzkq/stanford-professor-garry-nolan-analyzing-anomalous-materials-from-ufo-crashes
10 comments
Is there really no feasible natural explanation for inhomogeneities in stable magnesium isotopes in materials such as those found in, say, meteorites? How frequently do scientists do such fine-grained nanoSIMS analysis of materials containing magnesium? If the answer is “not at all frequently,” is it possible that this is within the boundaries of natural variation in these materials? I want to believe, I’m just a bit frustrated by the lack of context presented alongside this interview.
What am I missing? I skimmed the linked PDF @ [0] and it doesn't paint a picture remotely resembling what's being described in the VICE article:
"We see that the isotopic compositions of these four specimens are indistinguishable: the isotopic composition of the Brazil magnesium is clearly compatible with terrestrial origin."
Is there another paper documenting the nanoSIMS analysis?
[0] https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.55...
"We see that the isotopic compositions of these four specimens are indistinguishable: the isotopic composition of the Brazil magnesium is clearly compatible with terrestrial origin."
Is there another paper documenting the nanoSIMS analysis?
[0] https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.55...
I never thought in my life there would be a serious article on a scientist talking about unknown objects discharging molten metal. Never mind in the same article on research on directed EMF causing Havana Syndrome, or mentioning skinwalker ranch in the same paragraph…
Pandemics. People with Mysterious Brain Diseases. UAPs being talked about seriously. WTF has the world come to?
Pandemics. People with Mysterious Brain Diseases. UAPs being talked about seriously. WTF has the world come to?
Note that being a scientist does not ensure he is right. It only means that he got some training in some scientific field, published a few articles and someone hired him in a scientific position. More details in https://profiles.stanford.edu/garry-nolan
He studied biology, but biology is a very wide area. He studies some tiny area of biology, looking at the profile it looks like some parts of animals and cancer, but nothing about plants IIUC. It looks relevant for the discussion about brain damage, but not for the discussion about weird metals.
Anyway, I don't see anything about these topics in the published peer review papers. So it's just an opinion, like yours or mine. (And anyway, not all peer review articles are good, some journals are very bad, but that's another can of worms.)
He probably has a tenure position, so it's very difficult to fire him. Perhaps he is very good in his area, but has a weird side projects. If he does not make some extremely outraging claims, nobody will fire him.
He studied biology, but biology is a very wide area. He studies some tiny area of biology, looking at the profile it looks like some parts of animals and cancer, but nothing about plants IIUC. It looks relevant for the discussion about brain damage, but not for the discussion about weird metals.
Anyway, I don't see anything about these topics in the published peer review papers. So it's just an opinion, like yours or mine. (And anyway, not all peer review articles are good, some journals are very bad, but that's another can of worms.)
He probably has a tenure position, so it's very difficult to fire him. Perhaps he is very good in his area, but has a weird side projects. If he does not make some extremely outraging claims, nobody will fire him.
Specifically, he seems to specialize in building assay equipment for cellular biology, so there's overlap with physics. He seems like he'd have the skills to analyze weird materials and MRIs.
Entirely possible his weird side projects are wrong, but seeing smart people tackle the weirdness of UFOlogy is fun, even if they're on the wrong track.
Entirely possible his weird side projects are wrong, but seeing smart people tackle the weirdness of UFOlogy is fun, even if they're on the wrong track.
I share the same feelings. I think we've been witnessing a generational, technological and social transition in the past 10 or so years. I do not wish to add more fuel to the fire but judging by what I read (and crossing them in several different ways) I believe this is a MISO (Military Information Support Operations) disguised and foreshadowing the next war (or maybe we're already in it albeit in a very mild form). I just hope I'm wrong and that it's just noise.
There's a thing that's often used in biology called structure function. Sometimes, if you can just see the structure you can understand the function. I can look at a heart and watch a little bit of how it moves and understand that's the function.
[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_follows_function
I'm still convinced that "Havana Syndrome" is just CIA officers feeling bad about what they do or who they work for. This used to be called "regret" or "having a conscience". The recordings that "diplomats" made of buzzing noises turned out not to be secret spy tech, but crickets in heat.