Build Pong in Your Terminal with Go for Some Reason(earthly.dev)
earthly.dev
Build Pong in Your Terminal with Go for Some Reason
https://earthly.dev/blog/pongo/
43 comments
I'm mainly do C#, TypeScript, C++ (occasionally) and for some reason I really like go. There are really only 4 things I wish was different and perhaps it would become my goto language.
1) Simplify error handling. It's annoying having to create your own stack frame by composing strings.
2) Let me use my variable names. I find it so annoying that I have to come up with names just because the variable is being shadowed. Either change the package scope to use :: or make types be PascalCase with an `pub` keyword for exports.
3) Add a shorthand for lambda instead of having to type `func()`.
4) Allow a file scoped, not package, variable.
1) Simplify error handling. It's annoying having to create your own stack frame by composing strings.
2) Let me use my variable names. I find it so annoying that I have to come up with names just because the variable is being shadowed. Either change the package scope to use :: or make types be PascalCase with an `pub` keyword for exports.
3) Add a shorthand for lambda instead of having to type `func()`.
4) Allow a file scoped, not package, variable.
I don't really buy into go (it's not my type of language), but I wanted to ask a genuine question: are there many semi-mainstream languages that don't have modules that _just work_, or an official plugin for VSCode that just works? I've never found that to be a "plus", as much as it is the bare minimum. and nowadays I don't see that many up and coming languages that miss out on it.
Admittedly though the cross compilation is nice (not enough to win me over, at all, but still very nice. The very few times I've needed cross compilation in other languages I reached for nix, and that wasn't very pleasant)
Most compiled languages have fractured build ecosystems, and may require some tricky invocation orders, external+not-included dependencies, or some funky flags depending on your compiler version. Or may just not work because you have the wrong compiler, missing their preferred build scripting runtime, etc.
NPM (packages) frequently go down, doesn't resolve packages, or just does something unexpected. Java has the Gradle/Maven split, C++ has a few extra common ones - Make/CMake, Autotools, Ninja, Meson, etc. Modern C# is the one that's got a similar scene to Go from what I've seen.
Go is simple and consistent. It adheres to the Zen of Python, particularly "There should be one– and preferably only one –obvious way to do it.", better than Python itself does (IMO). You check out a repo, you run go build, and 90% of the time you have a binary. A 5 line Python script could automate this process, good luck doing the same with Java or C++.
NPM (packages) frequently go down, doesn't resolve packages, or just does something unexpected. Java has the Gradle/Maven split, C++ has a few extra common ones - Make/CMake, Autotools, Ninja, Meson, etc. Modern C# is the one that's got a similar scene to Go from what I've seen.
Go is simple and consistent. It adheres to the Zen of Python, particularly "There should be one– and preferably only one –obvious way to do it.", better than Python itself does (IMO). You check out a repo, you run go build, and 90% of the time you have a binary. A 5 line Python script could automate this process, good luck doing the same with Java or C++.
That is 100% fair. I mostly develop on .NET+TS at $dayjob so I never really have experienced particular problems with nuget, and I've had the luck of never having an npm package go down on me either - so I just never really experienced the problems that people are frustrated about.
I wrote a post about this topic. Consistent tooling is very valuable.
https://earthly.dev/blog/programming-language-improvements/
https://earthly.dev/blog/programming-language-improvements/
This is really the selling point of Go for me that makes up for it's shortcomings. I've probably lost years off my life thanks to gradle.
When your build scripts require the power of a full-blown programming language, I do have to wonder what catastrophe lead to such complications! I'm sure there's a reason for it and all, but it's just not something I will deal with unless I am being paid (handsomely) to do so.
You tell me, what other language has a drop-in solution that provides module management, formatting, integration with the debugger, intellisense docs, linting with static analysis while I'm typing, and even testing? The plug-in is actually made by the Go Team at Google, its not like adding Black and Poetry etc. in python, its not even like the moving target that is create-react-app or whatever people use now in JS/TS. Those are much older languages, but what would you compare it to?
I'm not saying Go is the only modern language, its pretty retro in some ways, but it has an exceptional tooling story. The fact that its mainly based around the official go tool helps.
I'm not saying Go is the only modern language, its pretty retro in some ways, but it has an exceptional tooling story. The fact that its mainly based around the official go tool helps.
Rust also has those things. (It also has performance profiling, fuzz testing, benchmarking tools, etc, etc., as I'm guessing golang does.)
Thats dope, and I kind of figured.
The tooling is probably why Go and Rust get compared so often, despite having little in common. Its weird to see that written off as a common feature though. It was nothing like my experience with clojure or julia.
If there are any languages with Go-like tooling that have a bigger job market, I'd love to know.
The tooling is probably why Go and Rust get compared so often, despite having little in common. Its weird to see that written off as a common feature though. It was nothing like my experience with clojure or julia.
If there are any languages with Go-like tooling that have a bigger job market, I'd love to know.
[deleted]
> after being configured by the single official Go plugin
Are you using a small or large code base? VSCode falls over at my job's monorepo. Goland has much better performance.
Are you using a small or large code base? VSCode falls over at my job's monorepo. Goland has much better performance.
[deleted]
Re: perf for hobby gamedev, I basically agree for native builds, but lately I've felt like Wasm support seems key for hobby gamedev (so you can have more people play your game / without downloading it / it works directly on mobile too without dealing with app or play store). And Go perf in Wasm unfortunately is not so good (I was hitting big GC pauses when trying to make a game with Ebiten and large images).
I ended up writing a Go -> C++ compiler. Go's standard library parser/typechecker made it very doable. The games I've done with it don't use the GC at all but also don't manually manage memory -- they use an ECS api which helps. https://github.com/nikki93/gx -- the README links to development workflow video and complete example game code. I get the perf, interop/libs and portability of C/C++ but with Go's developer experience (well the build system involves C/C++ of course but I have something set up there that I now just use).
I ended up writing a Go -> C++ compiler. Go's standard library parser/typechecker made it very doable. The games I've done with it don't use the GC at all but also don't manually manage memory -- they use an ECS api which helps. https://github.com/nikki93/gx -- the README links to development workflow video and complete example game code. I get the perf, interop/libs and portability of C/C++ but with Go's developer experience (well the build system involves C/C++ of course but I have something set up there that I now just use).
I've been working professionally in Go for almost a year now and I do agree Go is really pragmatic and is largely nice for just "getting stuff done".
However there is an absurd amount of nil checking which can be easy to miss and not always caught by the common linting tools. Once you use Result/Option types and proper enums with pattern matching that is expressive and safe, it wears on you that Go does not have this.
However there is an absurd amount of nil checking which can be easy to miss and not always caught by the common linting tools. Once you use Result/Option types and proper enums with pattern matching that is expressive and safe, it wears on you that Go does not have this.
> it wears on you that Go does not have this
And it's a completely unforced error and doubled-down on by the development team.
And it's a completely unforced error and doubled-down on by the development team.
Where did they double down on this? They explicitly said that the design of generics was leaving the door open for sum types.
This was one of my first projects as a kid with Visual Basic. But with working paddles and all!
I love Go and use it daily, but I wish we had anything similar to VB, even if it's just a helper UI builder. Being able to shape, position, and name objects visually, then modify attributes in code, is (to me) so much easier than doing it strictly in code. Does any such GUI builder exist? I don't necessarily want VB or a similar IDE, just a way to design using a GUI and program behind it.
I love Go and use it daily, but I wish we had anything similar to VB, even if it's just a helper UI builder. Being able to shape, position, and name objects visually, then modify attributes in code, is (to me) so much easier than doing it strictly in code. Does any such GUI builder exist? I don't necessarily want VB or a similar IDE, just a way to design using a GUI and program behind it.
Kinda mystified there isn't an equivalent of VB for Python given its popularity. I mostly live in Jupyter notebooks which is fine for me but I sometimes want to make something with a GUI for my non-technical friends. I'd put in some time making an interactive form thing or so with a GUI but don't care badly enough to learn TK.
I can't stand scripting a GUI. If I'm gonna have a GUI I want to draw it and know what it's going to look like instead of getting surprises when I run it. Whoever does Visual Python will make a lot of money.
I can't stand scripting a GUI. If I'm gonna have a GUI I want to draw it and know what it's going to look like instead of getting surprises when I run it. Whoever does Visual Python will make a lot of money.
I know it’s Apple-only, but I find Interface Builder in Xcode to be an extremely similar and enjoyable experience.
Lazarus for FreePascal is kind of close but its just for Pascal.
I have longed for such a thing as well, having used VB5&6 in my late teens to make countless games and utility apps.
Love the other "this is how I learned <language>, too" comments. I'll add mine into the mix :) note this was implemented in 2014: https://github.com/mrryanjohnston/golang-experiments/tree/ma...
I think videogames are a great way to showcase channels in Go.
I think videogames are a great way to showcase channels in Go.
Fantastic game! Have you considered using the Bubble Tea [1] library?
I recently used Bubble Tea to write a Flappy Bird-like game [2] and it was incredibly fun. It splits your app up into a Model (state), a View function (that uses the model to return a string), and an Update function (that updates the model), like Elm. Plus the other Charm libraries are great for styling terminal output, spring physics, etc.
[1] https://github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea [2] https://github.com/kbrgl/flapioca
I recently used Bubble Tea to write a Flappy Bird-like game [2] and it was incredibly fun. It splits your app up into a Model (state), a View function (that uses the model to return a string), and an Update function (that updates the model), like Elm. Plus the other Charm libraries are great for styling terminal output, spring physics, etc.
[1] https://github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea [2] https://github.com/kbrgl/flapioca
I always love projects that build from nothing and go step-by-step to build something more complex. Reminds me of one of my favorite posts of a similar style building out "Metaballs" with different algorithms: http://jamie-wong.com/2014/08/19/metaballs-and-marching-squa....
Nice work!
Nice work!
There's not enough projects like this. Do X and Y language where X and Y are very specific technologies.
Or maybe I'm just bad at internet searches!
Or maybe I'm just bad at internet searches!
I've been trying to learn go by building Pong in my terminal. Here is part One where I create a bouncing ball.
Well now we have a program that says “Hi!” until you press escape. For the loneliest among us, that may be enough. But we came here to build a game, so we’ll need some kind of animation.
Thanks! Was great fun following along. Noticed a small typo in the first code segment, `screen` becomes `s` when calling s.Init().
Looking forward to part 2!
Looking forward to part 2!
func main() {
screen, err := tcell.NewScreen()
if err != nil {
log.Fatalf("%+v", err)
}
if err := s.Init(); err != nil {
log.Fatalf("%+v", err)
}
}Thank you! I noticed a few grammar errors as well so I’ll be sure to update this.
I remember a pretty similar program that was included in the Vic-20 users guide circa 40 years ago. I miss the simplicity of learning by coding something that finally ends up like a game!
Who said you need a reason? This is great!
This is a great idea for learning Go! I’ve been trying to pick it up recently and tried to do a CLI for indexing and searching through files. Reading PDFs is such a long hill to climb while trying to learn a new language. A game or something with a TUI sounds like a much more enjoyable goal.
[deleted]
I learned some basics of Go in much the same way a few years ago. An implementation of Andy Sloane's (famous?) donut in a terminal: https://github.com/onnos/donut
And playing with funky patterns using braille characters: https://github.com/onnos/rotaterm
It's not great quality code but it got me started! It's nice to have some immediate output you can play with - tcell is lovely.
And playing with funky patterns using braille characters: https://github.com/onnos/rotaterm
It's not great quality code but it got me started! It's nice to have some immediate output you can play with - tcell is lovely.
The article is great, but the title here has been editorialized a bit. I'm not super familiar with HN, so what's the best way to get that fixed to match the actual article?
Send mail to [email protected] :)
Note that this was submitted by the author, who's in the thread.
Note that this was submitted by the author, who's in the thread.
this is dank
Build Pong in Your Terminal, with Go for some reason
I am coming off of a couple of years of playing with C to understand languages better, and free myself from the complex stacks that I use at work. I've been chatting with a highly-educated PL friend of mine about my language likes/dislikes, and he would always remark on really pragmatic choices Go had made.
I had always dismissed Go, and that has really let me see a reddit/HN hivemind I'm susceptible to. It was so easy to think "GC? Google? No thanks". After a while I saw a pattern of people disparaging Go in favor of Rust, but then using Python/JS for their own actual code. It made me feel that maybe the hivemind had overlooked the actual use-cases.
I understand that the language had its problems, from sub-par GC performance to poor Windows support, to the "no generics" meme. But for someone just getting into it now, it has been SEAMLESS. VSCode is a first-class dev environment after being configured by the single official Go plugin. Modules are awesome, and coming from C its so nice to just "go build" and have that just work.
I really expect Go to pick up a lot of steam with hobby developers soon. For simple games, Go is capable of producing cross-compiled static Windows binaries with SDL2 from Linux. That kind of dev experience could really win over a lot of C++ holdouts from the itch.io and HandMade communities that would prefer if C++ was just C with classes and types. The GC is so fast that it doesn't even cut into a 60fps time budget, and all the preallocation tricks from C still work fine... it has pointers and arrays like we are used to.
I was shocked to find how much I'd enjoyed Go. If you are interested in C/Zig/Odin, I think it is certainly worth checking out Go as a tool to play with arrays and structs, a paradigm many programmers enjoy. Having high quality libraries in the stdlib like JSON (de)serializers and even animated GIF authoring means that a lot of the simple code you might write for your own amusement won't be subject to the fast bitrot of other ecosystems.