Xerox copier flaw changes numbers in scanned docs (2013)(theregister.com)
theregister.com
Xerox copier flaw changes numbers in scanned docs (2013)
https://www.theregister.com/2013/08/06/xerox_copier_flaw_means_dodgy_numbers_and_dangerous_designs/
8 comments
there is a great talk about this from the guy that found it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FeqF1-Z1g0
it's in german though...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FeqF1-Z1g0
it's in german though...
He gave it also in English:
https://youtu.be/c0O6UXrOZJo
https://youtu.be/c0O6UXrOZJo
that was 31C3 talk, they translate stuff live
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXXmhxbQ-hk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXXmhxbQ-hk
Interestingly, this problem is mentioned in the opening paragraph of this particle by Ted Chiang, one of the best takes on ChatGPT.
https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-...
> In 2013, workers at a German construction company noticed something odd about their Xerox photocopier: when they made a copy of the floor plan of a house, the copy differed from the original in a subtle but significant way. In the original floor plan, each of the house’s three rooms was accompanied by a rectangle specifying its area: the rooms were 14.13, 21.11, and 17.42 square metres, respectively. However, in the photocopy, all three rooms were labelled as being 14.13 square metres in size.
https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-...
> In 2013, workers at a German construction company noticed something odd about their Xerox photocopier: when they made a copy of the floor plan of a house, the copy differed from the original in a subtle but significant way. In the original floor plan, each of the house’s three rooms was accompanied by a rectangle specifying its area: the rooms were 14.13, 21.11, and 17.42 square metres, respectively. However, in the photocopy, all three rooms were labelled as being 14.13 square metres in size.
the same Ted Chiang who wrote the short story that inspired the movie Arrival, which is in the very excellent short story collection Story of Your Life and Others...
It's like single glyphs version of what's going on with ai assistants: confidently wrong, wrong but looks good so you trust it.
When a normal old codec is used at too low quality levels, it looks like low quality and you do not trust the data.
Maybe the codec needs to include a disclamer watermark that it injects into the output that the image was processed by jbig2 with the aggressive option and all text is not to be trusted.
When a normal old codec is used at too low quality levels, it looks like low quality and you do not trust the data.
Maybe the codec needs to include a disclamer watermark that it injects into the output that the image was processed by jbig2 with the aggressive option and all text is not to be trusted.
Previous discussion about the same issue (but different article): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32537073
Then ask "was it scanned and archived digitally" and if yes, claim that the document be invalidated on the basis of the scanning station altering the document.