Talk-to-ChatGPT(github.com)
github.com
Talk-to-ChatGPT
https://github.com/C-Nedelcu/talk-to-chatgpt
47 comments
Yeah I also made a chrome extensions for this for personal use, but realized that there wasn't a good trade-off between having it sound good and getting rapid responses.
You don't want to start speaking before you get a full sentence, or the TTS will sound weird. You don't want to wait for a full sentence, because it would be too slow.
Besides that, speech recognition wasn't working well enough, and I heard (haven't tried) Whisper has the same delay problem where you again cannot stream it, but must wait for the user to have spoken for a while.
You don't want to start speaking before you get a full sentence, or the TTS will sound weird. You don't want to wait for a full sentence, because it would be too slow.
Besides that, speech recognition wasn't working well enough, and I heard (haven't tried) Whisper has the same delay problem where you again cannot stream it, but must wait for the user to have spoken for a while.
Spectacular plugin, great work. This will make it fun and easy to make my friends try out ChatGPT when they come over.
I wonder what kind of work is needed to get a more human-like voice?
I wonder what kind of work is needed to get a more human-like voice?
This is great, thanks!!!
Been noodling on this idea and love to have an example/inspiration. Thanks for sharing.
(Edit) Specifically glad to learn about the web speech APIs. As a hobby programmer by night and Product Manager by day learning about more and more capabilities I can leverage in toy projects is awesome.
I was considering trying out whisperAI but this seems like a better stepping stone for “simpler” starter projects.
(Edit) Specifically glad to learn about the web speech APIs. As a hobby programmer by night and Product Manager by day learning about more and more capabilities I can leverage in toy projects is awesome.
I was considering trying out whisperAI but this seems like a better stepping stone for “simpler” starter projects.
Awesome. I saw someone asking for this feature to practice other languages just yesterday.
In Firefox, it only supports reading which is already cool.
Here's a CDN script in case someone wants to load it in JS Console:
https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/C-Nedelcu/talk-to-chatgpt@main/c...
Edit: script url
In Firefox, it only supports reading which is already cool.
Here's a CDN script in case someone wants to load it in JS Console:
https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/C-Nedelcu/talk-to-chatgpt@main/c...
Edit: script url
Shameless self plug but I built something similar: https://heylaing.com . Basically I got fed up of not being able to practice my language skills realistically (fed up of always getting precanned responses etc). I also had limited time to get a language buddy and so built this.
Originally it was just a python script, then a terrible Flask App that me and some friends used, then posted it on reddit and it went somewhere so started to develop it.
Any feedback is welcome! I'm currently working on an iOS and Android app but never built in react-native before so it's a steep learning curve.
Originally it was just a python script, then a terrible Flask App that me and some friends used, then posted it on reddit and it went somewhere so started to develop it.
Any feedback is welcome! I'm currently working on an iOS and Android app but never built in react-native before so it's a steep learning curve.
It would be good to implement an initial command phrase to begin dictating, like "Hey Alexa," "OK Google," or in this case e.g. "Hey GPT"
Also, I feel like it sends the text to ChatGPT too quickly, for me at least. Wish it would wait a bit longer in case I have anything to add. A command phrase to end the sentence might be too much.
Also, I feel like it sends the text to ChatGPT too quickly, for me at least. Wish it would wait a bit longer in case I have anything to add. A command phrase to end the sentence might be too much.
Your Code says it uses the browser's speech recognition API.
``` // Start speech recognition using the browser's speech recognition API function CN_StartSpeechRecognition() { ```
As far as I know, speech recognition in Chrome, unlike on Android phones, is being done online. Means audio is being sent to Google servers. How does this comply with GDPR?
``` // Start speech recognition using the browser's speech recognition API function CN_StartSpeechRecognition() { ```
As far as I know, speech recognition in Chrome, unlike on Android phones, is being done online. Means audio is being sent to Google servers. How does this comply with GDPR?
> As far as I know, speech recognition in Chrome, unlike on Android phones, is being done online.
I'm no expert, but I would imagine this is Google's problem. The website is calling an API that no reasonable person would expect to leak data to Google – in fact, Google has an implementation that doesn't – yet personal data is being leaked, without the user's consent.
At no point does the operator of this website act as controller for the voice data.
I'm no expert, but I would imagine this is Google's problem. The website is calling an API that no reasonable person would expect to leak data to Google – in fact, Google has an implementation that doesn't – yet personal data is being leaked, without the user's consent.
At no point does the operator of this website act as controller for the voice data.
There are a lot of admirable things about the EU, and this is by no means intended as EU bashing.
But could there be a more on the nose example of why the EU lags in tech innovation and entrepreneurship? An solo maker builds a cool little tool as a personal project, open sources it on github, and is immediately attacked for the effort by cosplay compliance regulators. It defies parody.
The commenters also have a cartoon understanding of the GDPR - the author of the Chrome extension is neither a data controller nor a data processor.
I'd ask the commenters that jump on a project like this to introspect a bit and try to understand why their first impulse on seeing someone's effort like this is to try to take it down.
But could there be a more on the nose example of why the EU lags in tech innovation and entrepreneurship? An solo maker builds a cool little tool as a personal project, open sources it on github, and is immediately attacked for the effort by cosplay compliance regulators. It defies parody.
The commenters also have a cartoon understanding of the GDPR - the author of the Chrome extension is neither a data controller nor a data processor.
I'd ask the commenters that jump on a project like this to introspect a bit and try to understand why their first impulse on seeing someone's effort like this is to try to take it down.
The author should at least make users aware that data is being sent to Google servers.
I don't see GDPR as preventing innovation. Quite on the contrary, it has enabled European companies, which host their data by default in the EU, to create competitive products.
That being said, I think in Europe there's, compared to the US, more old money controlled by people who don't like to share or lose their wealth.
I don't see GDPR as preventing innovation. Quite on the contrary, it has enabled European companies, which host their data by default in the EU, to create competitive products.
That being said, I think in Europe there's, compared to the US, more old money controlled by people who don't like to share or lose their wealth.
You raise a very valid point, but one could make an argument that it's _okay_ for innovation and entrepreneurship to slow down, if it's done to protect people's rights and ensure that companies do things "properly."
It seems to be an eternal cyclical process: people come up with something that either sidesteps or has no regulation whatsoever, you get massive growth and innovation, which turns to exploitation, which leads to regulation.
We've seen it in all fields, from tech to pharmaceuticals to big box retail. Is it an acceptable compromise in society to "let things happen" for a while before regulating? Or should we all slow down and think about the consequences before pushing forward?
It seems to be an eternal cyclical process: people come up with something that either sidesteps or has no regulation whatsoever, you get massive growth and innovation, which turns to exploitation, which leads to regulation.
We've seen it in all fields, from tech to pharmaceuticals to big box retail. Is it an acceptable compromise in society to "let things happen" for a while before regulating? Or should we all slow down and think about the consequences before pushing forward?
Does it claim to be compliant anywhere? I would assume it isn’t.
Gdpr compliance is not optional for services offered in the EU
Does every client side javascript project someone builds on GitHub for fun need to be verified if it is GDPR compliant?
And what if the source someone shares is using APIs that aren't GDPR complaint? That you can download, compile it, run it on your machine and then say that it was offered to you and so must be GDPR compliant.
I'm not in the EU and not familiar with the particulars of GDPR but that feels like it is stretching for a reason to complain.
And what if the source someone shares is using APIs that aren't GDPR complaint? That you can download, compile it, run it on your machine and then say that it was offered to you and so must be GDPR compliant.
I'm not in the EU and not familiar with the particulars of GDPR but that feels like it is stretching for a reason to complain.
[deleted]
Hm, this is actually a very interesting case. If the extension is (I'm assuming) literally just leveraging the API and not storing anything at all, would it be sufficient to let people know it's doing so in order to be compliant with GDPR?
Does this even count as something that would be covered by GDPR? Is it because the data collection is tangential to the "service" being offered?
Chrome's Privacy page [1] doesn't say anything about the API. Other people have also been wondering about the privacy implications of using the Speech API. What an interesting rabbit hole!
1: https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/privacy/
Does this even count as something that would be covered by GDPR? Is it because the data collection is tangential to the "service" being offered?
Chrome's Privacy page [1] doesn't say anything about the API. Other people have also been wondering about the privacy implications of using the Speech API. What an interesting rabbit hole!
1: https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/privacy/
Why don't you tell us how it violates GDPR? And then you can make an issue on Github to tell the guy to stop offering his thing in the EU.
[deleted]
Has anyone built a Siri integration/Shortcut for this? I'm referring to the actual ChatGPT model, not via the normal OpenAI API.
ChatGPT does not (yet) have an API. If there are any, they would have to resort to screen-scraping.
An API for ChatGPT is apparently coming.
An API for ChatGPT is apparently coming.
That's really no different to screen scraping. It could break at any moment. And I'm pretty sure it violates the OpenAI TOS too.
Darn, I guess GP will have to go without then
Have not looked into this but someone I know said they got it working: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gePhjvKdUro
I’m surprised no one has made a chatgpt alexa skill. Although I realize throttling and costs probably stop that.
If you google, you will find many, eg. https://www.chatgptalexa.com/
Nice - I think Web Speech APIs are a super powerful tool that a lot of devs would be surprised to learn they get out of the box (I was).
This is using Google's text to speech and speech to text, right? Isn't that a paid service?
Chrome provides basic speech to text for free via the browser's implementation of the Web Speech API. There is a different Google Cloud version, which is a commercial service that provides a better model for more accuracy and optional data logging. The page below can be used by Safari as well, which sends the data to Apple's servers for processing instead.
https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/demos/speech.html
https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/demos/speech.html
Cool. I built something similar for myself. Though it uses the GPT-3 API rather than ChatGPT:
Whisper.cpp for text input. Google WaveNet Voice for text output. One button for the user to start and stop speaking, like Siri. Allows me and my daughter to literally talk to GPT-3 and have real conversations with it.
(Though I’d never let her do that without supervision. Also, she has learned very quickly that she needs to take everything it says with a grain of salt, and that it’s important to fact-check its answers.)
I’d be happy to show it, but Whisper is quite CPU intensive. I don’t know how to host it so it can handle any meaningful number of concurrent users without breaking the bank. If anyone has suggestions or wants to help, let me know.
Whisper.cpp for text input. Google WaveNet Voice for text output. One button for the user to start and stop speaking, like Siri. Allows me and my daughter to literally talk to GPT-3 and have real conversations with it.
(Though I’d never let her do that without supervision. Also, she has learned very quickly that she needs to take everything it says with a grain of salt, and that it’s important to fact-check its answers.)
I’d be happy to show it, but Whisper is quite CPU intensive. I don’t know how to host it so it can handle any meaningful number of concurrent users without breaking the bank. If anyone has suggestions or wants to help, let me know.
Theoretically, one could compile whisper.cpp to run in the browser using emscripten, maybe made faster with webgl...
I think this would be quite a heavy page load time for a website, but if the model file gets cached, and the user has a decent CPU/GPU, it... could work?
I think this would be quite a heavy page load time for a website, but if the model file gets cached, and the user has a decent CPU/GPU, it... could work?
That is a cool idea! And I just realized the Whisper.cpp guy has already built something like this. Whisper WASM. [1]
Unfortunately, on my iPhone this runs so slow that I might just as well send my mic recordings to a typist. And mobile is important here. Being able to quickly pull this up on your phone really is part of the fun.
[1] https://whisper.ggerganov.com/
Unfortunately, on my iPhone this runs so slow that I might just as well send my mic recordings to a typist. And mobile is important here. Being able to quickly pull this up on your phone really is part of the fun.
[1] https://whisper.ggerganov.com/
Use a cloud service for speech to text, like Google’s API, and you should be able to handle a pretty good number of users without breaking the bank. (I believe they have a free tier, then pretty reasonable pricing. You’d just have to set up a rate limiter on your server to make sure nobody’s abusing it).
Nobody has done this well enough yet. What's required:
1. Transcribe your speech using Whisper (in that case you don't have to make an effort to speak clearly so long as you're in a relatively quiet room)
2. Get a TTS system that actually sounds good (e.g. Descript, Eleven Labs, etc.)
3. Have RAPID responses like a normal human conversation (mostly on OpenAI's side... so hopefully ChatGPT Plus fixes that)
1. Transcribe your speech using Whisper (in that case you don't have to make an effort to speak clearly so long as you're in a relatively quiet room)
2. Get a TTS system that actually sounds good (e.g. Descript, Eleven Labs, etc.)
3. Have RAPID responses like a normal human conversation (mostly on OpenAI's side... so hopefully ChatGPT Plus fixes that)
The bottleneck is currently TTS. The best option is probably Eleven Labs, but response times are unpredictable. GPT response times can be worked around by falling back to a faster model, but you can't do that with TTS because the voice needs to be consistent. It seems like current state of the art are diffusion models ala DALL-E, see e.g. [1] (the developer, James Betker now incidentally works for OpenAI). It's nontrivial to turn this into something that works in real-time without a decent budget, though.
Whisper (for transcription) is insanely fast and good.
1. https://github.com/neonbjb/tortoise-tts
Whisper (for transcription) is insanely fast and good.
1. https://github.com/neonbjb/tortoise-tts
The Eleven Labs guy told me they put out an update that made it more consistent, which maybe it is slightly better, but still unpredictable like you say. Maybe you could ask them about it again. I did suggest they make a higher queue priority available for higher level paid tiers.
rapid responses is basically the biggest problem, it is quite hard but also because you can't stream tokens into any TTS system and have it sound good. The more "complete" the corpus the better it seems to be at using the right sort of pausing and such. So it is more like a: LLM needs to be directly connected to a TTS type of issue, somehow.
If you want to have rapid responses, you basically want to have the first part of the response ready to go as soon as it is detected the user is no longer speaking. Were they asking a question? While the actual answer is being processed, start responding with "let me answer that for you..." or something like that.
This seems "well enough" to me! Faster responses sound like a BIG ask for a free service, and I imagine the best AI voice tech is highly proprietary.
Funny. I was just today thinking of this but on a Raspberry Pi with mic and speakers. Google Bard is surely coming to Google Home but it would be a fun project to get a head start of sorts!
rip to the corporate voice assistants!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ky9L1eGxj_k&t=1s