The golden age of Kotlin and its uncertain future(shiftmag.dev)

48 pointsby philonoist3 anni fa76 comments

The golden age of Kotlin and its uncertain future

https://shiftmag.dev/kotlin-vs-java-2392/

77 comments

The future is very certain. Mainline Java has been cherry picking the best features from these languages after there's sufficient traction and the issues have already surfaced. Since the tooling has to support both Java and some other contender, Java always gets first-class support. Using any of the alternative JVM languages (except maybe Clojure) gives you better syntax, somewhat better abstractions for a few years, and worse tooling. And syntax is overrated. Java might be verbose, but it's well-understood, and it's not actually what slows development.

pkphilip3 anni fa

Yep, all true.

These days Java isn't slow to develop on at all. There are plenty of very good frameworks where you can get going with developing a web app or rest service in next to no time with far better tooling support, sophistication etc.

.NET is a serious contender though.

Node isn't really on the same ballpark in terms of maturity.

ShadowBanThis013 anni fa

Not to mention that Node isn't a language, and Deno is cleaner.

pkphilip3 anni fa

I was referring to Java as a platform rather than just as a language. .NET isn't a language either

ShadowBanThis013 anni fa

Indeed, but I only wanted to include so much pedantry!

DeathArrow3 anni fa

>.NET is a serious contender though.

It the other way around. Java has barely caught up with C#. C# team is typically introducing more features, faster.

royjacobs3 anni fa

I'm not sure language design should be a race to see who can add the most features, though.

I prefer Java's more thoughtful approach to introducing new features.

keithnz3 anni fa

in what way do you think it's more thoughtful than C#?

za3faran3 anni fa

No OP, but for example you still see the C# folks still struggling to add discriminated unions to the language because of complex interactions due to its too many features[1]. Virtual threads are easier to use than async/await is another example.

[1] https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/113

neonsunset3 anni fa

Performant implementation of discriminated unions in .NET (unlike any that you would see in JVM) requires modification of both the type system and the runtime to account for non-boxing representation of struct unions as well as unions in which GC references alias value types/structs. This is highly non-trivial and the people who could be working on this are currently busy with other features namely Rust-like traits called explicit and implicit extensions. Don't forget that .NET is worked on by at least 10x smaller community and teams than JVM implementations and yet delivers much better YoY degree of improvement and much nicer user experience (Gradle lol).

In addition, green threads approach is a strictly worse and a more limited solution that only solves thread blocking without unlocking the variety of terse concurrency patterns enabled by the way the tasks are handled in .NET. They also add significant overhead to interop with native code due to thread pinning/stack switching (also applies to Go).

esafak3 anni fa

Kotlin has great tooling, and Java library compatibility, so why wouldn't you use it? When you work in Kotlin, you give the masses of Java programmers the ability to contribute and a licence to check their EnterpriseGradeFizzBuzzSolutionStrategyFactory mentality at the door. Do Java projects in industry even use the new stuff? Also, you can use virtual threads with coroutines.

DeathArrow3 anni fa

>Kotlin has great tooling, and Java library compatibility, so why wouldn't you use it?

As an average company what you want from a language is: your team already knows it or is fast to learn, it is arguably better in a measurable way (development is faster, codebase is easier to maintain), developers like it more, it has a large support and audience.

How many of these does Kotlin check?

dehrmann3 anni fa

Kotlin is the Dvorak to Java's Qwerty. It looks better in theory, but not where it actually counts, and not enough to justify going against the grain.

wiseowise3 anni fa

All of them except first.

happymellon3 anni fa

I'm allowed to use Streams but var isn't because it makes GitHub PRs difficult to parse.

We got to upgrade from Java 8 to Java 17 in 2023.

throwaway136233 anni fa

I've worked in "enterprise" and have a different experience. The enterprise projects that I was working on switched to Java 8 in 2015. There were some legacy services that remained on 5 or 6 for a while, but they were mostly in "maintenance" mode and nobody wanted to spend time on them.

I have over two decades of experience and there has always been room for trying out the "new" technologies and keeping up with the latest best practices, even in enterprise. I know that not everyone has this experience, but there are actually a lot that happens outside slow big American legacy companies...

In my current startup we use the latest JVM and have a mix of Java and Kotlin. It works really well and we have never experienced any problems with development speed that was related to code or language syntax. JVM + Spring boot + Postgres may be the "boring" choice, but it has enabled us to focus on getting things done and focusing on the product. It didn't take long for juniors to be productive in our stack either. Spring itself looks a bit scary at first sight, but once you learned the basic philosophy you have less issues than a Node project in my experience.

I know that my experience may not match your experience, so I recognize that I can't make a generic statement. It's just a bit frustrating to see similar statements made by people with bad experiences.

- Not all Java development happens in enterprise. There is a thriving eco system of small to middle sized companies and startups using Java

- Not all enterprises are the same. I've actually noticed a shift to the other extreme, where enterprise uses the latest technologies to attract new employees. Nobody who has a choice wants to work with factory patterns on an old version of Java

- Old Java patterns like factories and extreme use of inheritance is out of fashion. There is of course a lag like in any trends, but remember that Java is so widely used so you will always find companies that are slow to adopt, or have legacy software that is in maintenance mode.

happymellon3 anni fa

Luckily I don't have to deal with FactoryFactories either.

I have to keep alternating between startup and enterprise so that I can keep sane but also get pension contributions, so I do know there is a great world out there. Just not always great paid (am in UK).

ivan_gammel3 anni fa

>Do Java projects in industry even use the new stuff?

Yes. Kotlin fans need to understand that Kotlin is not competing with the old Java ways and stop mentioning bloody enterprise as an argument against Java, because bloody enterprise is largely ignorant to Kotlin‘s cause. EnterpriseStrategyAdapter anti-pattern is not a language problem, it is a management problem. It won’t be solved neither by new features of Java nor by new features of Kotlin. The real competition is in the new code in startups and Java has one big advantage there: faster recruiting, more reliability in tooling, better quality of business code for the money. Kotlin is a good perk for developers in late stage startups, where the teams are big, delivery timelines more relaxed and you can afford fancy but less mature language or tool to consume resources instead of delivering more business value.

msy3 anni fa

I could count the number of startups I’m aware of building on Java on one hand, after a wood chipper accident. For perf it’s rust, for web it’s Go or node/deno/bun for single front/back language.

MrBuddyCasino3 anni fa

I have never seen Golang being used for business logic backends, its Java, Kotlin or .NET, and then nothing else for a long while. It is not expressive enough but shines in other areas, mainly infrastructure.

Remember that "Systems Programming", which is what Golang was designed for, isn't necessarily just Kernel and device drivers, but everything that isn't "Application Programming", and that includes the whole K8S networking and container stuff where it is very successful.

mustermannBB3 anni fa

Kotlin is weird inclusion in that list with Java and .NET unless you'd include Android.

ivan_gammel3 anni fa

I know a number of them, but that’s not really important. You didn’t mention Kotlin, right? :) Often enough whatever stack was used at the seed stage, it is eventually either replaced or complemented by Java, meaning that new code is written either on latest LTS or even on evergreen version.

DeathArrow3 anni fa

So you think Rust and Go are more frequently used than Java for new code? Do you have something to support you claim?

Looking at TIOBE and PYPL, it comes that for backend Java and .NET are huge, followed by .Node.js, followed by Python and then PHP.

threeseed3 anni fa

Java is often faster than Rust on typical single-threaded code. Rust is faster when you want to leverage features like SIMD.

And when it comes to concurrency Rust is the worst language I've ever used by far. The type checker makes dealing with objects between threads extremely painful. With the JVM it's all just handed for you.

Rust is great when you want a tiny binary with minimal memory consumption.

the_gipsy3 anni fa

> new code in startups and Java has one big advantage there: faster recruiting, more reliability in tooling, better quality of business code for the money.

You're delusional if you really think any of this is true. There are, proportionally to "enterprise", extremely few startups using java. For good reasons.

ivan_gammel3 anni fa

I have no idea what „good reasons“ are you talking about except fancy language as a compensation perk. Java is a good choice for startups, even if it is not the most popular choice (often for bad reasons). I have proven it several times by being able to ship working and scalable solutions quickly and hiring decent team with time to close open vacancy within 1 month.

esafak3 anni fa

Your sibling commenter said (s)he just got off Java 8 in 2023. My experience was similar; that's why I asked.

Also, it's hard to find Java programmers who haven't been tainted by that enterprise mentality, so in a way it makes hiring hard if you don't have the resources to filter the junk. When you see Clojure or Scala on a resume you know they're above that.

ivan_gammel3 anni fa

Well, my team is now on latest LTS (21) and we do use new features in our code. Hiring an engineer who can write modern code is not any more difficult than hiring without this requirement. It is generally a management problem, that any skilled senior manager should be able to solve. After all, enterprise anti-patterns are not uncurable poison, e.g. switching to record-style accessors is something people can do on their first day easily.

DeathArrow3 anni fa

>Kotlin is a good perk for developers in late stage startups, where the teams are big, delivery timelines more relaxed and you can afford fancy but less mature language or tool to consume resources instead of delivering more business value.

The proof being?

tpm3 anni fa

We use Java 17 features on all our projects now, expecting to update the platform to 21 in a year or so. Allowed features vary by project, some reviewers don't like vars (though I do) because it makes it harder to understand the code for them.

hitekker3 anni fa

> Java might be verbose, but it's well-understood, and it's not actually what slows development.

I think you're onto something. Maybe some Java-by-default workplaces lack technically interesting problems that engineers want to solve, so those engineers instead overfocus on the frictions of the parts they can control. Maybe those engineers desire expressiveness in their working programming language to compensate for the restrictions on the rest of their work.

Just a hunch though.

[deleted]3 anni fa

throwaway136233 anni fa

I think you may have a point. At mature companies, they have largely solved the product market fit and uses a stable stack that just works. I have worked worked for such companies, and developers jumped at the chance to use the latest (untested) technologies for greenfield projects if they had the chance.

In my startup we also use a "boring" stack, but the problems we solve are innovative and motivation in itself. The developers work closely with customers and can see the impact that the product has. They are no longer working in a Jira-factory and while they are still interested in technology they also find motivation in the product itself.

sho3 anni fa

> syntax is overrated

Speak for yourself there good buddy. It's pretty important to me!

But I do agree with your broader point. From one perspective, Kotlin has been a great success if we define its mission as a test-bed and laboratory for improving Java proper. Unfortunately, while it has arguably succeeded in that mission, in doing so it might unavoidably fail in another mission, which is to thrive as an independent language.

I'd liken it to yarn and npm. Yarn was a huge success.. at forcing npm to massively improve and thus basically rendering itself irrelevant. A bittersweet success, but a success nonetheless..

I wonder if there's a term for this kind of self-sacrificial project which makes the world better for having existed but doesn't survive the process..

voidfunc3 anni fa

This. I love the Kotlin language but Java had just caught up and the things that made Kotlin super exciting several years ago are less exciting now as Java advanced. Also I looked back at Kotlin recently and things have gotten way more complex than I remember around 1.0.

Kotlin needed to succeed on the native front to live beyond Java. It didn't and that puts it in a perilous long-term spot.

MrBuddyCasino3 anni fa

The one major thing Kotlin still has going for it is null safety, and IMO it eclipses every other „nice“ feature. But Java will get this too, and then I‘m not sure I can justify using it.

Oh and I wish Java would support „it“ in lambdas, very useful.

cryptos3 anni fa

Java will not have the same level of null safety as Kotlin. Instead Types can be explicitly marked as "not null", so the default is still that every reference type can be null.

MrBuddyCasino3 anni fa

Yes unfortunately, but I mostly miss null safety in domain classes, not in the stdlib. It remains to be seen if this is "good enough" or not.

brabel3 anni fa

Will Java have null-safety?? Can you link to that, I haven't heard anything at all about this.

MrBuddyCasino3 anni fa

See "Use of null-restricted types" which is part of Project Valhalla[0], the proposed syntax is the opposite of Kotlin, where everything is non-null by default but can be made nullable by adding a "?", eg "val s: String? = null".

The Java version instead looks like this, where you add an exclamation mark to mark it as non-nullable:

    class Cursor {
        private Point! position;
    }

[0] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8251554

brabel3 anni fa

Ok, but notice that's not about making Java null-safe in any sense. It's about making "value types" (which will be introduced by Project Valhalla) possibly non-null, mostly for optimization purposes (though it should also benefit programmers reason about value types if they can't be null).

As mentioned in the relevant JEP[1]:

"A null-restricted type is a reference type expressed with the name of a value class followed by the ! symbol."

Goals: "Allow a value class to "opt in" to the automatic creation of an appropriate default value used to initialize fields and arrays that don't store null."

Non-goals: "It is not a goal to support null-restricted types for identity classes or classes that do not provide a default value."

So, I don't see how that's in any way going to threaten Kotlin's position as a null-safe language - Java will almost certainly always have "unsafe" `null`, removing it from Java seems simply impossible at this point (notice that Dart managed to do it, but it had a much, much smaller ecosystem than Java, and even then, it required multiple years of migration of every single Dart package in Pub - and the ones that were unmaintained were simply abandoned and no longer work with the latest versions of Dart which is fully null-safe).

[1] https://openjdk.org/jeps/8316779

MrBuddyCasino3 anni fa

I actually missed that it was restricted to value classes, thanks for the correction, this is unfortunate. To be fair null-checking (or just documenting null-safety) the data classes is the main use case, as other cases of nullability (class collaborators, eg a repository injected into a service) are usually a bug and quickly fixed.

The data that flows through the app at runtime is the big issue, and even just documenting null-safety at the API interfaces goes a long way in making refactorings safer and maintenance less of a pain. Those are usually records nowadays (DTOs, VOs, Entities).

pharmakom3 anni fa

Syntax may be overrated but expressiveness is not.

gleenn3 anni fa

Clojure is such a joy to use. I get the maturity of the Java ecosystem and the immutability, functional style, and concision of a lisp. If performance really matters, and Clojure does perform well, you can always dive into stuff with all the Java tooling and interop is extremely easy. I really wish more people picked it up.

cryptos3 anni fa

I feel no desire to use dynamic typing again, as nice as Clojure might otherwise be. While Kotlin is not strictly immutable, it is much better in this regard than Java. Collections are immutable by default in Kotlin (or more precisely you get an immutable view defined by the respective interface) and that is quite useful in practice.

switch0073 anni fa

Will they cherry pick Kotlin’s null safety…?

cryptos3 anni fa

No, they will allow to mark types as explicitly not null (the other way around). The default in Java will still be that everything can be null.

wiseowise3 anni fa

What a low quality article. Language is more just a set of features. Anyone who tried both Java and Kotlin for reasonable amount of time will understand that. Regardless of how many features Java adopts from Kotlin or other modern language it will still remain shackled by billions of lines of legacy code and boilerplate consequently.

The only one who might like the article is self-conscious Java developer who wants to feel good by bashing on competing language.

Wish it wasn’t morning so I could elaborate on every point. Might reply later to this comment.

cryptos3 anni fa

> Null was always a pitfall in Java. It has slightly improved with the controversial Optional type. It’s also why I suggest that everyone use only wrapper types everywhere, instead of primitives, unless they can prove with a JMH test that a primitive provides enough of a performance benefit.

That doesn't make sense at all! Why should one do it without a need? To have NullPointerException with "primitive" types, too?

> Kotlin ecosystem is severely lacking compared to Java. FAANG has first-class support and commitments to Java, like providing JDK with multi-year support commitments.

It is not really needed to provide JDKs or something else especially for Kotlin, because Kotlin basically just uses the JVM (at least if you use the JVM as a target).

> To this day, there are significantly fewer Kotlin developers than Java developers.

Yes, that is probably true. Although almost every Android developer should know Kotlin these days and there are quite a few them. But even if a developer doesn't know Kotlin at all, it is relatively easy for a Java developer to learn it. In my experience it a takes a few days to a few weeks to be at least as productive as with Java (even not all Kotlin features are learnt in this time).

> Lack of progress: Compared to Java lately (e.g., records two years ago, pattern matching, and VT release this year), Kotlin has been stagnating in delivering the big features that would bring us (Infobip) value over alternatives.

Here, I agree. Some years ago I was super excited about Kotlin and couldn't wait for a new release. These days new releases are mostly boring. Maybe the most important stuff is simply done, but then there are enough interesting ideas to improve it (real pattern matching, meta programming, union types, ...). But JetBrains and Google decided that it is more important to improve the fundamental infrastructure first and decided to create a new, faster compiler (K2). As boring at it is feature-wise, I think it is a wise decision, because every project would benefit from it. The plan is to add new features, once the compiler is ready.

kmonsen3 anni fa

Maybe in the backend but for mobile (android) kotlin is still a thing and will be for a long time.

dave44203 anni fa

Scala isn’t dead. I’m job hunting right now, and seeing plenty of Scala jobs. Not as many as Node+TS+React, but what do you expect?

guytv3 anni fa

"Scala isn't dead" reminded me of this one "No no he's not dead, he's, he's restin'!": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZw35VUBdzo

threeseed3 anni fa

It also benefits from being one of the only full-stack languages.

Scala.js has excellent front-end frameworks like Slinky React [1], Laminar [2] and Scala has industry-leading concurrency libraries like ZIO [3]. I've yet to find anything that comes close for end to end web apps.

[1] https://slinky.dev [2] https://laminar.dev [3] https://zio.dev

629514133 anni fa

If you subtract Spark/Flink-related ones not really. Plenty only in comparison with Kotlin backend roles (i.e. non-existent in the Bay Area). It's very disappointing to me personally but it is what it is.

DeathArrow3 anni fa

>Scala isn’t dead.

Scala isn't dead. It went to play between the stars with Pearl and Ruby.

stefs3 anni fa

in my opinion, modern java's language ergonimics are good but kotlin is still far better. i didn't write much plain java in long time since having to adopt kotlin.

i love the integrated null safety / handling at a syntax level with the ? operator; optional felt clunky in comparison. lambdas plus everthing's an expression allows for concise, readable code. and i love the scope functions. i agree that extension methods may have turned out to be a footgun, but i feel like it hasn't been a huge issue in the field. it's doubtful java is able to integrate most of those ideas in a way that feels as natural.

i don't understand why the author chose to ignore android, it's an elephant in this room. as long as android doesn't drop kotlin for something else as the lingua franca of the platform it's got certain guarantees.

willtemperley3 anni fa

Absolutely, while Kotlin is a first class citizen in Android, it isn't going away. Neither is Scala because there are plenty of developers who like bleeding-edge and experimental language features. Personally I don't use it anymore as really don't need things like implicit parameters, but props to each and every early adopter of language features that help Java evolve. Thanks to Kotlin and Scala, Java can now be very pleasant to code in.

cetu863 anni fa

While the author dislikes extension functions in kotlin they enable one feature that Java doesn't have: With them you can create domain specific languages within kotlin that are quite ergonomic.

- Jetbrains has built a nice reactive js wrapper with them. - The gradle configuration is written in a kotlin dsl.

They can be used to specify configuration and add meta information and thus replace Java annotations.

That is my kotlin "killer" feature because I personally don't like annotations.

Java's language design has always been "pedagogical" (or patronizing) to not give the developer to much power to create to much abstractions and complexity. So it's not just its age but also this philosophy that has made Java a rather inelegant language ( compared with e.g. kotlin)

FlyingSnake3 anni fa

There are two problems Kotlin faces; Kotlin the project/product and Kotlin the language. While this article touches Kotlin as a Product, it’s very thin on the Language aspect.

Here’s an old post discussing the real troubles Kotlin Lang might face due to the inevitable divergence of Java/JVM.

https://np.reddit.com/r/java/comments/ndwz92/can_i_get_some_...

nealliu3 anni fa

Make sure you read the reply a few comments down from the original post, it invalidates much of the op.

FlyingSnake3 anni fa

True, the old article had some nice rebuttals. I wonder how many of these predictions came out to be true so far.

mustermannBB3 anni fa

My only issue with Kotlin is Kotlin's over reliance on JetBrain products and being so tightly tied to a company which priority it is to of course sell their IDE. To be fair, one of course use the free community edition but still you kinda need a JetBrain product to ensure you getting the most out the language. With language servers these days, that feels like it is going the opposite direction.

dingi3 anni fa

As I see, the only purpose of Kotlin is a be test bed for novel features to JVM based languages. And eventually Java is going to integrate those features better than Kotlin. And Kotlin's advantages are gone like that. To be honest, I have never seen Kotlin used in environments other than Android. The day Google decides to move Android development to another language will be the day Kotlin dies. Or becomes a zombie.

DeathArrow3 anni fa

>And eventually Java is going to integrate those features better than Kotlin

Kotlin has better syntax and is less verbose. That matters for a lot of developers. Kotlin deals with null in a better way. Kotlin has better types.

throwaway136233 anni fa

> I have never seen Kotlin used in environments other than Android

I have seen several companies that use Kotlin as a backend language (often with Spring). I personally don't find the differences enough to bother switching from Java, but I also don't mind working with Kotlin in existing projects.

ShadowBanThis013 anni fa

Does the "pattern matching" referred to here work like JavaScript's "destructuring?" It's the thing where you can call a function with an object, but the function's parameters extract one or more of the object's members directly without mentioning the object's class, so it'll take anything that has appropriately named members.

nsonha3 anni fa

no, pattern matching is more like destructuring AS CONDITIONS (eg: if object has this structure) of switch blocks. While destructuring is simply sugar for assignment, pattern matching is more complex. I don't know about Java but in some languages you can customize the pattern so that it is not neccessarily in the actual shape of the object. In some languages applying pattern matching at the top level of the function is the equivalence of overloading.

ShadowBanThis013 anni fa

Thanks! Intuitively this sounds like it enables what at one time would have been called bad programming (widespread reliance on RTTI), but on the other hand a lot of rules have turned out to be arbitrary.

DeathArrow3 anni fa

I think they've partly implemented C# version of pattern matching.

phendrenad23 anni fa

To me, Kotlin is so similar to Java that it might just survive in the way that Elixir and Erlang coexist.

nsonha3 anni fa

yes, even years ago before 1.0, Kotlin blended in with existing Java code pretty well, it's not that big a learning curve and adds a really nice std lib on top of Java. So I don't really relate to the framing that it competes with modern Java.

bobm_kite93 anni fa

I'd love to see Java adopt Kotlin's more advanced type system: Proper support of nullable/non-nullable types, better generics and no primitives.

Not sure how they could get there but that would be amazing.

Also Kotlin has a pretty good JavaScript and Native support story now.

nbittich3 anni fa

I agree, I remember learning Ceylon few years ago in the metro while going at work, now it is probably one of the rarest programming language that we can say for sure it's dead (has been archived few years ago iirc).

ShadowBanThis013 anni fa

"FAANG has first-class support and commitments to Java"

Nobody told Apple that.

Dig1t3 anni fa

Apple has an incredible amount of Java running server side, and they maintain their own JVM/tooling.

Support on Mac is admittedly not the best though.

r1jsheth3 anni fa

one thing i definitely liked about kotlin was reduced verbosity. otherwise all the other points, you made me ponder a bit. let's see where kotlin goes.

jillesvangurp3 anni fa

The future is always a bit uncertain. But Kotlin's future actually looks pretty good to me. This article looks like the author is not really clued in to the massive amount of progress and change happening especially in the last year. There's nothing wrong with being a bit old an conservative and stuck in your Java ways. Been there done that and trying to be better than that now. But this article is just a bit overly dismissive and poorly argued.

I'm biased of course having used Kotlin extensively for the last six years and having made the switch from Java. From my perspective It's simply a much better Java. And I have 25 years experience with that, mostly server side.

And the way I'm using it, it's also a better Typescript for me. If you have trouble parsing that last bit, I'm using kotlin-js to develop frontend code. It's actually really nice for that even though not many people do this. Well worth a look if you are getting tired of dealing with Javascript's idiosyncrasies (which typescript inherits) and a bit jealous of what all the cool kids doing mobile applications are using. Which would be using fancy Kotlin and Swift UI frameworks mainly.

Kotlin-js being nice to use should not be that surprising because of course a lot of Android developers use and love it and a lot of the libraries and practices port over very well to the web if you use kotlin-js. E.g. I use dependency injection (koin); which as it turns out is equally useful and nice to have in a browser as it is on Android and in Spring or other places.

There are a few changes happening this year with Kotlin that are exciting for Kotlin users and interesting for people not yet using it:

- Kotlin native is stabilizing. It now works well on IOs, Android, Linux, Windows, and MacOS. It's not "just another jvm language" anymore. The multiplatform library ecosystem is really starting to thrive. Lots of growth there. Especially in the last year. And I maintain a few myself.

- The web assembly compiler is now available in an alpha version and browser support for garbage collection in WASM just rolled out in Firefox and Chrome a few months ago. This is required by Kotlin's wasm support as it does not bundle its own garbage collector. Safari should follow soon/eventually. This means you can now use kotlin-wasm in a browser without having to fiddle with feature flags in your browser. Multiplatform library support for this is still a bit a work in progress but most kotlin multi platform libraries should start having wasm targets in the next few months. Wasm works in servers and on servers, lambda functions, and edge networking. So, first class Kotlin support for wasm is a big deal and the whole kotlin multi platform library ecosystem is coming along.

- Kotlin 2.0 is in Beta currently and should release in a few months (spring?). Kotlin native and wasm support and that are all happening at the same time and come on the tail end of a years long effort to re-engineer the compiler and IDE toolchain. Work on Kotlin 2.0 actually started about three or so years ago and it has included a gradual rewrite of the compiler through the 1.6-1.9 releases.

- Building on all this is Compose multiplatform, which brings Google's Jetpack Compose to other platforms. That's currently stable for a few platforms, in alpha versions on others (like IOS and web). That's something that should stabilize towards the end of the year. We'll have a cross platform, natively compiling UI framework that is usable across web (wasm), IOS (native), Android (native) and the three Desktop platforms (jvm, for now). So, that could end up being a nice alternative to things like flutter and react-native. Or indeed to packaging up web applications as PWAs or using things like electron.

It might not be everybody's cup of tea but that's a lot of progress that came together in the last year. I use other languages besides Kotlin. So, I can appreciate other languages as well. But Kotlin is just really nice.